AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations

IF 6.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Luna Leoni, Ginetta Gueli, Marco Ardolino, Mateus Panizzon, Shivam Gupta
{"title":"AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations","authors":"Luna Leoni, Ginetta Gueli, Marco Ardolino, Mateus Panizzon, Shivam Gupta","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2024-0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to provide empirical evidence on adopting artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI, in knowledge management (KM) processes and its impact on organisational decision-making. Specifically, the study addresses three key research questions: <em>RQ1:</em> How is (generative) AI adopted within KM processes in organisations? <em>RQ2:</em> What factors influence the adoption of AI in these processes, either facilitating or inhibiting it? RQ3: How does AI adoption in KM processes affect organisational decision-making?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An explorative investigation has been conducted through semi-structured interviews with KM and AI experts from a worldwide sample of 52 mostly private, large and for-profit organisations. Interviews have been analysed through a mixed thematic analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study provides an original framework in which the three investigated concepts are interconnected according to a dual relationship: linear and retroactive and 20 factors affecting AI adoption within KM processes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The provided model guides managers in improving their organisational decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes. Moreover, according to the rational decision-making model, the authors propose a six-step systematic procedure for managers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that simultaneously addresses AI, KM and decision-making and provides an integrated framework showing the relationships between them, allowing organisations to better and practically understand how to ameliorate their decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2024-0262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to provide empirical evidence on adopting artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI, in knowledge management (KM) processes and its impact on organisational decision-making. Specifically, the study addresses three key research questions: RQ1: How is (generative) AI adopted within KM processes in organisations? RQ2: What factors influence the adoption of AI in these processes, either facilitating or inhibiting it? RQ3: How does AI adoption in KM processes affect organisational decision-making?

Design/methodology/approach

An explorative investigation has been conducted through semi-structured interviews with KM and AI experts from a worldwide sample of 52 mostly private, large and for-profit organisations. Interviews have been analysed through a mixed thematic analysis.

Findings

The study provides an original framework in which the three investigated concepts are interconnected according to a dual relationship: linear and retroactive and 20 factors affecting AI adoption within KM processes.

Practical implications

The provided model guides managers in improving their organisational decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes. Moreover, according to the rational decision-making model, the authors propose a six-step systematic procedure for managers.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that simultaneously addresses AI, KM and decision-making and provides an integrated framework showing the relationships between them, allowing organisations to better and practically understand how to ameliorate their decision-making through AI adoption in KM processes.

人工智能赋能知识管理决策流程:来自全球组织的经验证据
目的 本文旨在提供在知识管理(KM)过程中采用人工智能(AI)(包括生成式人工智能)及其对组织决策影响的实证证据。具体来说,本研究涉及三个关键研究问题:问题 1:组织如何在知识管理流程中采用(生成式)人工智能?问题 2:哪些因素会影响人工智能在这些流程中的应用,是促进还是阻碍?问题 3:在知识管理流程中采用人工智能对组织决策有何影响?设计/方法/途径通过对来自全球 52 家抽样机构的知识管理和人工智能专家进行半结构化访谈,开展了一项探索性研究。研究结果该研究提供了一个原创框架,其中三个调查概念根据双重关系相互关联:线性关系和追溯关系,以及影响在知识管理流程中采用人工智能的 20 个因素。此外,根据理性决策模型,作者为管理者提出了一个六步系统程序。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项同时涉及人工智能、知识管理和决策的研究,并提供了一个显示它们之间关系的综合框架,使组织能够更好、更切实地了解如何通过在知识管理流程中采用人工智能来改善决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
15.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Knowledge Management covers all the key issues in its field including: ■Developing an appropriate culture and communication strategy ■Integrating learning and knowledge infrastructure ■Knowledge management and the learning organization ■Information organization and retrieval technologies for improving the quality of knowledge ■Linking knowledge management to performance initiatives ■Retaining knowledge - human and intellectual capital ■Using information technology to develop knowledge management ■Knowledge management and innovation ■Measuring the value of knowledge already within an organization ■What lies beyond knowledge management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信