Comparison of Digital Radiography and Computed Tomography as Nondestructive Testing Techniques for the Assessment of Lack of Fusion Defects in Additively Manufactured SS316L Coupon
IF 0.9 4区 材料科学Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Remakanthan S, Manu Joseph, Girish N Namboodiri, Anil Kumar V, Rohit Kumar Gupta
{"title":"Comparison of Digital Radiography and Computed Tomography as Nondestructive Testing Techniques for the Assessment of Lack of Fusion Defects in Additively Manufactured SS316L Coupon","authors":"Remakanthan S, Manu Joseph, Girish N Namboodiri, Anil Kumar V, Rohit Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.1134/S1061830924601946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Additive manufacturing has been playing a significant role in the manufacturing of components with complex geometries for aerospace applications recently. Comprehensive nondestructive testing techniques (NDT) are vital for the successful quality evaluation of critical components in this domain. Appropriate selection of the NDT scheme is essential for the qualification of such components. Major NDT techniques are designed based on the interaction of electromagnetic radiation and the response of the sound or heat energy transmission or reflection from the test object. The common defects noticed in the components made through additive manufacturing (AM) routes are pores, clusters of porosities, micro-cracks, lack of fusion and layer delamination. Considering the morphology and the complications in the geometry of aerospace components, many conventional NDT techniques are unsuitable for the inspection of AM components. Detection of unfused powder in the AM components by conventional radiography is difficult due to the low radiation attenuation coefficient gradient between the unfused and fused metallic regions. Also, the detection of defects in the radiography technique depends entirely on the beam path. Multiple radiography images with different beam angles and film combinations are essential to get the maximum information on the defects by conventional radiography techniques. In this aspect, computed tomography, a noncontact NDT technique provides a better solution for determining embedded defects such as lack of fusion and layer separation due to presence of unfused powder in the AM components. The present study compares the capability of computed tomography and 2D digital radiography for the identification of lack of fusion defects in stainless steel SS316L specimens fabricated through the Laser powder bed fusion AM route.</p>","PeriodicalId":764,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing","volume":"60 8","pages":"955 - 964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1061830924601946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Additive manufacturing has been playing a significant role in the manufacturing of components with complex geometries for aerospace applications recently. Comprehensive nondestructive testing techniques (NDT) are vital for the successful quality evaluation of critical components in this domain. Appropriate selection of the NDT scheme is essential for the qualification of such components. Major NDT techniques are designed based on the interaction of electromagnetic radiation and the response of the sound or heat energy transmission or reflection from the test object. The common defects noticed in the components made through additive manufacturing (AM) routes are pores, clusters of porosities, micro-cracks, lack of fusion and layer delamination. Considering the morphology and the complications in the geometry of aerospace components, many conventional NDT techniques are unsuitable for the inspection of AM components. Detection of unfused powder in the AM components by conventional radiography is difficult due to the low radiation attenuation coefficient gradient between the unfused and fused metallic regions. Also, the detection of defects in the radiography technique depends entirely on the beam path. Multiple radiography images with different beam angles and film combinations are essential to get the maximum information on the defects by conventional radiography techniques. In this aspect, computed tomography, a noncontact NDT technique provides a better solution for determining embedded defects such as lack of fusion and layer separation due to presence of unfused powder in the AM components. The present study compares the capability of computed tomography and 2D digital radiography for the identification of lack of fusion defects in stainless steel SS316L specimens fabricated through the Laser powder bed fusion AM route.
最近,快速成型制造技术在航空航天应用中复杂几何形状部件的制造中发挥了重要作用。全面的无损检测技术(NDT)对于成功评估该领域关键部件的质量至关重要。适当选择无损检测方案对于此类部件的质量鉴定至关重要。主要的无损检测技术都是基于电磁辐射的相互作用和测试对象的声能或热能传输或反射的响应而设计的。通过增材制造 (AM) 工艺制造的部件中常见的缺陷包括气孔、气孔群、微裂纹、熔合不足和层脱层。考虑到航空航天部件的形态和几何形状的复杂性,许多传统的无损检测技术都不适合对增材制造部件进行检测。由于未熔合金属区域和熔合金属区域之间的辐射衰减系数梯度较低,因此很难用传统的射线照相术检测 AM 组件中的未熔合粉末。此外,射线照相技术的缺陷检测完全取决于光束路径。要想通过传统射线照相技术获得最大程度的缺陷信息,必须使用不同的光束角度和胶片组合拍摄多张射线照相图像。在这方面,计算机断层扫描这种非接触式无损检测技术为确定嵌入式缺陷提供了更好的解决方案,例如因 AM 组件中存在未熔合粉末而导致的熔合不足和层分离。本研究比较了计算机断层扫描和二维数字射线照相术在识别通过激光粉末床熔融 AM 工艺制造的不锈钢 SS316L 试样中缺乏熔合缺陷方面的能力。
期刊介绍:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, a translation of Defectoskopiya, is a publication of the Russian Academy of Sciences. This publication offers current Russian research on the theory and technology of nondestructive testing of materials and components. It describes laboratory and industrial investigations of devices and instrumentation and provides reviews of new equipment developed for series manufacture. Articles cover all physical methods of nondestructive testing, including magnetic and electrical; ultrasonic; X-ray and Y-ray; capillary; liquid (color luminescence), and radio (for materials of low conductivity).