Establishment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and Visual Analog Scale Scores After Hallux Valgus Surgery.

Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1177/10711007241298675
Ignacio Pasqualini, Jason R Teplensky, Oguz Turan, Sarah E Poirier, William A Cantrell, James Mueller, Sagar Chawla, Sara Lyn Miniaci-Coxhead
{"title":"Establishment of Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and Visual Analog Scale Scores After Hallux Valgus Surgery.","authors":"Ignacio Pasqualini, Jason R Teplensky, Oguz Turan, Sarah E Poirier, William A Cantrell, James Mueller, Sagar Chawla, Sara Lyn Miniaci-Coxhead","doi":"10.1177/10711007241298675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although clinically relevant thresholds such as minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) have been widely described across orthopaedics, their application in hallux valgus surgery remains scarce. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID and PASS thresholds for the visual analog scale (VAS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores after hallux valgus surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed in patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery at a single institution from January 2021 through December 2022. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The specific PROMs used were the FAAM-activities of daily living (FAAM-ADL), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and VAS scale. Two methods were used to calculate MCID and PASS thresholds: a distribution-based approach for MCID and an anchor-based approach using responses to a 1-year postoperative satisfaction question for PASS. The analysis identified optimal cutoff points that maximized sensitivity and specificity based on the Youden index. Overall, 86% (136/158) completed baseline PROMs, and 73% (99/136) completed 1-year PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution-based MCID for FAAM-ADL, SANE, and VAS were calculated to be 10.8, 14.1, and 1.2, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved MCID thresholds was 54% for FAAM-ADL, 42% for SANE, and 96% for VAS. The PASS threshold for FAAM-ADL, SANE, and VAS were ≥78.5, ≥85, and ≤ 2, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved PASS thresholds was 78% for FAAM-ADL, 72% for SANE, and 69% for VAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds of FAAM-ADL, SANE, and VAS scores at 1-year follow-up for patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery. Overall, despite not meeting the MCID thresholds, patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery were still likely to be satisfied with their surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007241298675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although clinically relevant thresholds such as minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) have been widely described across orthopaedics, their application in hallux valgus surgery remains scarce. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID and PASS thresholds for the visual analog scale (VAS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores after hallux valgus surgery.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed in patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery at a single institution from January 2021 through December 2022. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The specific PROMs used were the FAAM-activities of daily living (FAAM-ADL), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and VAS scale. Two methods were used to calculate MCID and PASS thresholds: a distribution-based approach for MCID and an anchor-based approach using responses to a 1-year postoperative satisfaction question for PASS. The analysis identified optimal cutoff points that maximized sensitivity and specificity based on the Youden index. Overall, 86% (136/158) completed baseline PROMs, and 73% (99/136) completed 1-year PROMs.

Results: The distribution-based MCID for FAAM-ADL, SANE, and VAS were calculated to be 10.8, 14.1, and 1.2, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved MCID thresholds was 54% for FAAM-ADL, 42% for SANE, and 96% for VAS. The PASS threshold for FAAM-ADL, SANE, and VAS were ≥78.5, ≥85, and ≤ 2, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved PASS thresholds was 78% for FAAM-ADL, 72% for SANE, and 69% for VAS.

Conclusion: This study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds of FAAM-ADL, SANE, and VAS scores at 1-year follow-up for patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery. Overall, despite not meeting the MCID thresholds, patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery were still likely to be satisfied with their surgery.

确定足外翻手术后足踝能力测量和视觉模拟量表评分的最小临床意义差异和患者可接受症状状态阈值
背景:尽管临床相关阈值(如最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS))已在骨科领域得到广泛应用,但其在足外翻手术中的应用仍然很少。本研究的目的是确定外翻手术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)和足踝能力测量(FAAM)评分的MCID和PASS阈值:方法:对2021年1月至2022年12月期间在一家医疗机构接受足外翻手术的患者进行回顾性研究。术前和术后一年收集了患者报告的结果指标(PROMs)。具体使用的PROM包括FAAM-日常生活活动(FAAM-ADL)、单次数字评估(SANE)和VAS量表。计算 MCID 和 PASS 临界值采用了两种方法:MCID 采用基于分布的方法,PASS 采用基于锚的方法,即对术后 1 年满意度问题的回答。分析根据尤登指数确定了灵敏度和特异性最大化的最佳临界点。总体而言,86%(136/158)的患者完成了基线 PROMs,73%(99/136)的患者完成了为期 1 年的 PROMs:根据分布计算,FAAM-ADL、SANE 和 VAS 的 MCID 分别为 10.8、14.1 和 1.2。达到 MCID 临界值的患者比例分别为:FAAM-ADL 54%、SANE 42%、VAS 96%。FAAM-ADL、SANE和VAS的PASS阈值分别为≥78.5、≥85和≤2。FAAM-ADL达到PASS阈值的患者比例为78%,SANE为72%,VAS为69%:本研究为接受外翻手术的患者确定了随访1年时的FAAM-ADL、SANE和VAS评分的MCID和PASS阈值。总体而言,尽管未达到 MCID 临界值,但接受外翻手术的患者仍有可能对手术感到满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信