High-dose intranasal insulin in an adaptive dose-escalation study in healthy human participants.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Florian Schmitzberger, Jennifer Fowler, Cindy H Hsu, Manjunath P Pai, Robert W Neumar, William J Meurer, Robert Silbergleit
{"title":"High-dose intranasal insulin in an adaptive dose-escalation study in healthy human participants.","authors":"Florian Schmitzberger, Jennifer Fowler, Cindy H Hsu, Manjunath P Pai, Robert W Neumar, William J Meurer, Robert Silbergleit","doi":"10.1111/cts.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intranasal insulin is a putative neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest, but safety in humans at doses extrapolated from animal models is unknown. This phase I, open-label adaptive dose-escalation study explores the maximum tolerated dose of intranasal insulin in healthy human participants. Placebo or insulin at doses from 0 to 1000 units was given to healthy participants intranasally on repeated weekly visits. Serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels were measured serially at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min after administration. Twenty-four participants (12 female, median age 53, IQR 35-61) were enrolled. There was minimal change in average serum glucose after administration of intranasal insulin. Average serum insulin increased slightly in a dose-dependent manner, reaching maximum concentrations at 15 min. C-peptide decreased over time from administration in all groups. One participant had severe hypoglycemia (24 mg/dL at 45 min) and a different participant had mild hypoglycemia (51 mg/dL at 30 min), both after receiving 600 U intranasal insulin. Hypoglycemic episodes were associated with increases in serum insulin. Both participants continued in the study without hypoglycemia after additional doses. High-dose intranasal insulin up to 1000 U was generally well tolerated, with minimal measurable systemic absorption and without significant aggregate changes in mean glucose. Idiosyncratic episodic systemic absorption and hypoglycemia require further study and additional caution in potential clinical application. Further study of its target engagement and efficacy as a neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest at these doses is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 11","pages":"e70071"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intranasal insulin is a putative neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest, but safety in humans at doses extrapolated from animal models is unknown. This phase I, open-label adaptive dose-escalation study explores the maximum tolerated dose of intranasal insulin in healthy human participants. Placebo or insulin at doses from 0 to 1000 units was given to healthy participants intranasally on repeated weekly visits. Serum glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels were measured serially at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min after administration. Twenty-four participants (12 female, median age 53, IQR 35-61) were enrolled. There was minimal change in average serum glucose after administration of intranasal insulin. Average serum insulin increased slightly in a dose-dependent manner, reaching maximum concentrations at 15 min. C-peptide decreased over time from administration in all groups. One participant had severe hypoglycemia (24 mg/dL at 45 min) and a different participant had mild hypoglycemia (51 mg/dL at 30 min), both after receiving 600 U intranasal insulin. Hypoglycemic episodes were associated with increases in serum insulin. Both participants continued in the study without hypoglycemia after additional doses. High-dose intranasal insulin up to 1000 U was generally well tolerated, with minimal measurable systemic absorption and without significant aggregate changes in mean glucose. Idiosyncratic episodic systemic absorption and hypoglycemia require further study and additional caution in potential clinical application. Further study of its target engagement and efficacy as a neuroprotective therapy after cardiac arrest at these doses is warranted.

在健康人中进行的适应性剂量递增研究中的大剂量鼻内胰岛素。
鼻内胰岛素是心脏骤停后的一种潜在神经保护疗法,但根据动物模型推断的剂量对人体的安全性尚不清楚。这项 I 期开放标签适应性剂量递增研究探讨了健康人对鼻内胰岛素的最大耐受剂量。健康参与者每周重复经鼻给予安慰剂或 0 至 1000 单位剂量的胰岛素。在给药后 0、15、30、60、120、180 和 240 分钟连续测量血清葡萄糖、胰岛素和 C 肽水平。共有 24 名参与者(12 名女性,中位年龄为 53 岁,IQR 为 35-61)参加了此次研究。使用鼻内胰岛素后,平均血清葡萄糖的变化极小。平均血清胰岛素呈剂量依赖性轻微升高,在 15 分钟时达到最高浓度。所有组的 C 肽均在用药后随时间推移而下降。一名参试者出现严重低血糖(45 分钟时为 24 毫克/分升),另一名参试者出现轻度低血糖(30 分钟时为 51 毫克/分升),两人都是在接受 600 U 鼻内胰岛素治疗后出现的。低血糖发作与血清胰岛素升高有关。这两名参与者在继续接受额外剂量的胰岛素治疗后,均未出现低血糖症状。大剂量鼻内胰岛素的耐受性普遍良好,最高可达 1000 U,可测量的全身吸收极少,平均血糖的总体变化不大。对于偶发性的全身吸收和低血糖症,需要进一步研究,并在可能的临床应用中更加谨慎。在这些剂量下,还需要进一步研究其作为心脏骤停后神经保护疗法的目标参与和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信