Central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery does not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Jens Thomas Fredrik Osterkamp, Nikolaj Nerup, Morten Bo S Svendsen, Rune B Strandby, Lars Bo Svendsen, Eske K Aasvang, Henrik Vad, Astrid Plamboeck, Michael P Achiam
{"title":"Central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery does not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Jens Thomas Fredrik Osterkamp, Nikolaj Nerup, Morten Bo S Svendsen, Rune B Strandby, Lars Bo Svendsen, Eske K Aasvang, Henrik Vad, Astrid Plamboeck, Michael P Achiam","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gastric conduit can be created with partial preservation or a central ligation of the right gastric artery. Central ligation may facilitate complete removal of lymph node (LN) station 3; however, whether this influences conduit and anastomotic perfusion is unknown. Hence this study investigated whether a central ligation of the right gastric artery would affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion compared with partial preservation (local standard) during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer. Patients scheduled for robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomized to either central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery. Perfusion was assessed using quantified indocyanine green angiography: before gastric mobilization, after conduit formation, and after anastomosis. Hemodynamic variables during surgery and surgical outcomes were recorded. We included 70 patients between June 2020 and October 2021, of whom 5 were excluded from the final analysis. The two patient groups did not differ in conduit (0.07 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.05-0.08] vs. 0.07 u [IQR, 0.05-0.08], P = 0.86) or anastomotic perfusion (0.08 [standard deviation (SD), ±0.02] vs. 0.08 u [SD, ±0.02], P = 0.21), nor did they differ in intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leaks, postoperative complications, or 1-year survival. However, more LNs were resected in the central ligation group (36 [IQR, 30-44] vs. 28 [IQR, 23-43], P = 0.02). Introducing a central ligation of the right gastric artery did not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion, compared with partial preservation. However, significantly more LNs were resected.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gastric conduit can be created with partial preservation or a central ligation of the right gastric artery. Central ligation may facilitate complete removal of lymph node (LN) station 3; however, whether this influences conduit and anastomotic perfusion is unknown. Hence this study investigated whether a central ligation of the right gastric artery would affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion compared with partial preservation (local standard) during robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer. Patients scheduled for robot-assisted resection of gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomized to either central ligation or partial preservation of the right gastric artery. Perfusion was assessed using quantified indocyanine green angiography: before gastric mobilization, after conduit formation, and after anastomosis. Hemodynamic variables during surgery and surgical outcomes were recorded. We included 70 patients between June 2020 and October 2021, of whom 5 were excluded from the final analysis. The two patient groups did not differ in conduit (0.07 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.05-0.08] vs. 0.07 u [IQR, 0.05-0.08], P = 0.86) or anastomotic perfusion (0.08 [standard deviation (SD), ±0.02] vs. 0.08 u [SD, ±0.02], P = 0.21), nor did they differ in intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leaks, postoperative complications, or 1-year survival. However, more LNs were resected in the central ligation group (36 [IQR, 30-44] vs. 28 [IQR, 23-43], P = 0.02). Introducing a central ligation of the right gastric artery did not seem to affect conduit or anastomotic perfusion, compared with partial preservation. However, significantly more LNs were resected.

胃食管连接部癌机器人辅助切除术中,胃右动脉的中央结扎或部分保留似乎不会影响导管或吻合口的灌注:一项随机临床试验。
胃导管可以通过部分保留或中央结扎右胃动脉来创建。中央结扎可能有助于完全切除淋巴结(LN)站 3;但这是否会影响导管和吻合口的灌注尚不清楚。因此,本研究调查了在机器人辅助胃食管交界处癌切除术中,与部分保留(局部标准)相比,右胃动脉中央结扎是否会影响导管或吻合口灌注。计划接受机器人辅助胃食管交界处癌切除术的患者被随机分配到中央结扎或部分保留胃右动脉。在胃移动前、导管形成后和吻合术后,使用量化吲哚菁绿血管造影术评估灌注情况。手术期间的血流动力学变量和手术结果均被记录在案。我们在 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 10 月期间纳入了 70 名患者,其中 5 人未纳入最终分析。两组患者在导管(0.07[四分位距(IQR),0.05-0.08] vs. 0.07 u [四分位距(IQR),0.05-0.08],P = 0.86)或吻合口灌注(0.08[标准差(SD),±0.02] vs. 0.08 u [SD,±0.02],P = 0.21)方面没有差异,在术中失血、吻合口漏、术后并发症或1年生存率方面也没有差异。不过,中央结扎组切除的 LN 更多(36 [IQR, 30-44] 对 28 [IQR, 23-43],P = 0.02)。与部分保留相比,采用胃右动脉中心结扎似乎不会影响导管或吻合口的灌注。不过,切除的LN明显更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信