Gait assessment in the initial evaluation of posterior circulation stroke.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Isaac Smith, Eduard Valdes, Rubin Smith, Rachel Bandler Cohen, Jose Torres, Albert Favate, Kara R Melmed
{"title":"Gait assessment in the initial evaluation of posterior circulation stroke.","authors":"Isaac Smith, Eduard Valdes, Rubin Smith, Rachel Bandler Cohen, Jose Torres, Albert Favate, Kara R Melmed","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) presents diagnostic challenges due to its diverse clinical presentations. Timely detection is crucial, yet a highly sensitive, non-invasive screening tool for PCS is lacking. This study explores gait assessment as a readily accessible diagnostic tool for ruling out PCS in acutely vertiginous patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study, we examined medical records of 311 acutely vertiginous patients from the Get with the Guidelines Database at an academic hospital in New York City. Of these, 40 were diagnosed with PCS and 271 did not have PCS based on imaging and clinical criteria. We used multivariable logistic regression models and ROC curves to evaluate the association between objective gait abnormality (OGA) and PCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective gait abnormality (OGA) was observed in 38/40 (95 %) posterior circulation stroke (PCS) cases and 57/271 (21 %) controls (adjusted odds ratio 144, 95 %CI 24.4-855, p < 0.0001). In a predictive model, objective gait abnormality (OGA) exhibited excellent discrimination between cases and controls (AUC 0.9599, sensitivity 95.0 %, specificity 75.6 %, positive predictive value 36.5 %, negative predictive value 99.0 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gait assessment emerges as a highly-sensitive screening tool for ruling out posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in acutely vertiginous patients, enabling more efficient triage and patient management. Further prospective research is warranted to validate these findings in larger and more diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) presents diagnostic challenges due to its diverse clinical presentations. Timely detection is crucial, yet a highly sensitive, non-invasive screening tool for PCS is lacking. This study explores gait assessment as a readily accessible diagnostic tool for ruling out PCS in acutely vertiginous patients.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective case-control study, we examined medical records of 311 acutely vertiginous patients from the Get with the Guidelines Database at an academic hospital in New York City. Of these, 40 were diagnosed with PCS and 271 did not have PCS based on imaging and clinical criteria. We used multivariable logistic regression models and ROC curves to evaluate the association between objective gait abnormality (OGA) and PCS.

Results: Objective gait abnormality (OGA) was observed in 38/40 (95 %) posterior circulation stroke (PCS) cases and 57/271 (21 %) controls (adjusted odds ratio 144, 95 %CI 24.4-855, p < 0.0001). In a predictive model, objective gait abnormality (OGA) exhibited excellent discrimination between cases and controls (AUC 0.9599, sensitivity 95.0 %, specificity 75.6 %, positive predictive value 36.5 %, negative predictive value 99.0 %).

Conclusions: Gait assessment emerges as a highly-sensitive screening tool for ruling out posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in acutely vertiginous patients, enabling more efficient triage and patient management. Further prospective research is warranted to validate these findings in larger and more diverse patient populations.

后循环卒中初步评估中的步态评估
目的:后循环卒中(PCS)的临床表现多种多样,给诊断带来了挑战。及时发现至关重要,但目前尚缺乏一种高灵敏度、无创的 PCS 筛查工具。本研究将步态评估作为一种简便易行的诊断工具,用于排除急性眩晕患者的 PCS:在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,我们从纽约市一家学术医院的 "指南数据库"(Get with the Guidelines Database)中查阅了 311 名急性眩晕患者的病历。根据影像学和临床标准,其中 40 人被诊断为 PCS,271 人未被诊断为 PCS。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型和 ROC 曲线来评估客观步态异常(OGA)与 PCS 之间的关联:结果:38/40(95%)例后循环卒中(PCS)病例和 57/271(21%)例对照病例中观察到客观步态异常(OGA)(调整后的几率比144,95%CI 24.4-855,p结论:步态评估是一种非常重要的诊断方法:步态评估是排除急性眩晕患者后循环卒中(PCS)的高灵敏度筛查工具,可提高分诊和患者管理的效率。有必要进一步开展前瞻性研究,在更大范围、更多样化的患者群体中验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信