[Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy : Pros and cons].

Q4 Medicine
Sergio Richter, Bernd Lemke
{"title":"[Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy : Pros and cons].","authors":"Sergio Richter, Bernd Lemke","doi":"10.1007/s00399-024-01054-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an effective method for increasing quality of life and life expectancy for many patients with heart failure. Due to the good results, this procedure is used frequently in Germany and has established itself as a class I indication in heart failure therapy. In addition to His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing has now also made a name for itself, as it shows a good success rate and can be used in a wider range of patients. Now the question arises as to whether left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic biventricular pacing and what the evidence situation is in this respect. This question shall be discussed in this article considering current studies and guideline recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":52403,"journal":{"name":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","volume":" ","pages":"256-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-024-01054-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an effective method for increasing quality of life and life expectancy for many patients with heart failure. Due to the good results, this procedure is used frequently in Germany and has established itself as a class I indication in heart failure therapy. In addition to His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing has now also made a name for itself, as it shows a good success rate and can be used in a wider range of patients. Now the question arises as to whether left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic biventricular pacing and what the evidence situation is in this respect. This question shall be discussed in this article considering current studies and guideline recommendations.

[左束支起搏优于传统的心脏再同步疗法:利弊]。
心脏再同步化疗法(CRT)是提高许多心衰患者生活质量和预期寿命的有效方法。由于效果良好,该疗法在德国被广泛使用,并已成为心衰治疗的一级适应症。除 His bundle 起搏外,左束支起搏也已声名鹊起,因为它显示出良好的成功率,可用于更广泛的患者。现在的问题是,左束支起搏是否优于传统的双心室起搏,这方面的证据情况如何。本文将结合当前的研究和指南建议对这一问题进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie
Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Mit wissenschaftlichen Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten, Berichten über moderne Operationstechniken und experimentelle Methoden ist die Zeitschrift Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie ein Diskussionsforum für Themen wie: - Zelluläre Elektrophysiologie - Theoretische Elektrophysiologie - Klinische Elektrophysiologie - Angewandte Herzschrittmachertherapie - Bradykarde und tachykarde Herzrhythmusstörungen - Plötzlicher Herztod und Risikostratifikation - Elektrokardiographie - Elektromedizinische Technologie - Experimentelle und klinische Pharmakologie - Herzchirurgie bei Herzrhythmusstörungen Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgruppen Herzschrittmacher und Arrhythmie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie - Herz und Kreislaufforschung e.V. (DGK) sowie Stellungnahmen und praktische Hinweise runden das breite Spektrum dieser Zeitschrift ab. Interessensgebiete: Kardiologie, Herzschrittmachertherapie, Herzschrittmachertechnologie, klinische Elektrophysiologie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信