A Comparative Study of the Perspectives of Long-Stay Immigrants, Nurses and Cultural Mediators on Intercultural Communication: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70074
Francesc Ramos-Roure, Maria Feijoo-Cid, Josep Maria Manresa-Dominguez, Jordi Segura-Bernal, Rosa García-Sierra, Maria Isabel Fernández-Cano, Antonia Arreciado Marañón, Eduard Moreno-Gabriel, Clara Flamarich Gol, Pere Toran-Monserrat
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Perspectives of Long-Stay Immigrants, Nurses and Cultural Mediators on Intercultural Communication: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Francesc Ramos-Roure, Maria Feijoo-Cid, Josep Maria Manresa-Dominguez, Jordi Segura-Bernal, Rosa García-Sierra, Maria Isabel Fernández-Cano, Antonia Arreciado Marañón, Eduard Moreno-Gabriel, Clara Flamarich Gol, Pere Toran-Monserrat","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the perspective of nurses, long-stay immigrants and cultural mediators on intercultural communication in care encounters.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative secondary analysis of data obtained in two primary studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two sets of data from two primary studies on nurses and long-stay immigrants (including in total two focus groups and 15 in-depth interviews) were merged. The sample was extended to include a focus group of cultural mediators. An amplified analysis was conducted using Charmaz's approach to grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results are structured under the core category \"Agreements and discrepancies in intercultural communication,\" split into two subcategories: (1) Communication and the role of culture; (2) (Non) equitable and culturally (in)sensitive care. Immigrant patients and mediators detect barriers associated with generic aspects of communication, while nurses and mediators value culture. Nurses recognise paternalistic attitudes, while long-stay immigrants sometimes detect biased treatment that mediators do not see. Immigrant patients and mediators value informal conversation as a strategy for cultural learning and building mutual trust, while nurses request regulated training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show that there are always discrepancies in this relationship. Changes to health care should be based on the participation of all actors. Communication skills training programs should be implemented.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The convergences and divergences of nurses, immigrants and mediators expose new ways to approach care. Communication skills training programs should be implemented. Changes to health care should be based on the participation of all actors, including immigrant patients and mediators, and allow them to voice their opinions and make decisions.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study addresses intercultural communication from three different perspectives: nurses, long-stay immigrants and cultural mediators. Nurses, long-stay immigrants and cultural mediators sometimes show convergence but never completely agree. The research may have an impact on primary-care nursing by making it more culturally competent.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Each participating long-stay immigrant, nurse and cultural mediator reviewed their own interview. The findings were reviewed by a verifier member of each group (a nurse, patient and mediator).</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 11","pages":"e70074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the perspective of nurses, long-stay immigrants and cultural mediators on intercultural communication in care encounters.

Design: Qualitative secondary analysis of data obtained in two primary studies.

Methods: Two sets of data from two primary studies on nurses and long-stay immigrants (including in total two focus groups and 15 in-depth interviews) were merged. The sample was extended to include a focus group of cultural mediators. An amplified analysis was conducted using Charmaz's approach to grounded theory.

Results: The results are structured under the core category "Agreements and discrepancies in intercultural communication," split into two subcategories: (1) Communication and the role of culture; (2) (Non) equitable and culturally (in)sensitive care. Immigrant patients and mediators detect barriers associated with generic aspects of communication, while nurses and mediators value culture. Nurses recognise paternalistic attitudes, while long-stay immigrants sometimes detect biased treatment that mediators do not see. Immigrant patients and mediators value informal conversation as a strategy for cultural learning and building mutual trust, while nurses request regulated training.

Conclusion: The findings show that there are always discrepancies in this relationship. Changes to health care should be based on the participation of all actors. Communication skills training programs should be implemented.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The convergences and divergences of nurses, immigrants and mediators expose new ways to approach care. Communication skills training programs should be implemented. Changes to health care should be based on the participation of all actors, including immigrant patients and mediators, and allow them to voice their opinions and make decisions.

Impact: This study addresses intercultural communication from three different perspectives: nurses, long-stay immigrants and cultural mediators. Nurses, long-stay immigrants and cultural mediators sometimes show convergence but never completely agree. The research may have an impact on primary-care nursing by making it more culturally competent.

Patient or public contribution: Each participating long-stay immigrant, nurse and cultural mediator reviewed their own interview. The findings were reviewed by a verifier member of each group (a nurse, patient and mediator).

长期居留移民、护士和文化调解员对跨文化交流的观点比较研究:二次定性分析。
目的:比较护士、长期居留移民和文化调解人对护理工作中跨文化交流的看法:设计:对两项主要研究中获得的数据进行二次定性分析:合并了两项主要研究中关于护士和长期居留移民的两组数据(共包括两个焦点小组和 15 个深入访谈)。样本扩大到包括一个文化调解员焦点小组。采用 Charmaz 的基础理论方法进行了放大分析:研究结果以 "跨文化交流中的共识与差异 "为核心类别,分为两个子类别:(1)交流与文化的作用;(2)(非)公平和文化(不)敏感的护理。移民患者和调解员发现了与一般交流有关的障碍,而护士和调解员则重视文化。护士认识到家长式的态度,而长期居留的移民有时会发现调解员没有发现的偏颇待遇。移民患者和调解员重视非正式谈话,将其作为学习文化和建立互信的策略,而护士则要求进行规范的培训:研究结果表明,这种关系中始终存在差异。医疗保健的变革应基于所有参与者的参与。应实施沟通技能培训计划:护士、移民和调解员的共同点和不同点揭示了新的护理方法。应实施沟通技巧培训计划。医疗保健的改变应基于所有参与者的参与,包括移民患者和调解员,并允许他们发表意见和做出决定:本研究从护士、长期居留移民和文化调解员三个不同角度探讨跨文化交流问题。护士、长期居留的移民和文化调解人有时会表现出趋同性,但从未完全达成一致。这项研究可能会对初级保健护理工作产生影响,使其更具文化胜任能力:每位参与研究的长期移民、护士和文化调解员都审查了自己的访谈。每个小组(护士、病人和调解员)的一名核查员对调查结果进行了审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信