"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)" and "Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)": Clinical validation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Natália Aparecida de Godoy, Suellen Cristina Dias Emidio, Dorothy A Jones, Elenice Valentim Carmona
{"title":"\"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)\" and \"Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)\": Clinical validation.","authors":"Natália Aparecida de Godoy, Suellen Cristina Dias Emidio, Dorothy A Jones, Elenice Valentim Carmona","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To clinically validate the NANDA International (NANDA-I), nursing diagnoses (ND) of \"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)\" and \"Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)\" in postpartum women and their infants, and to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of their elements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2023 to April 2024. Recruitment happened at a public teaching hospital, approaching dyads from the neonatology outpatient clinic and the rooming-in. The researcher applied the tool, assessed the dyad and medical records. Statistical analysis was based on accuracy measures and inferential statistics. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The sample comprised 205 Brazilian dyads: 57 (27.80%) presented \"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104),\" whereas 203 (99.02%) presented the \"Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106).\" \"Unsustained sucking on the breast\" was the most sensitive defining characteristic (DC) for the \"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104).\" All the DCs of \"Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)\" showed relevant sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings validated the presence of NANDA-I ND \"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)\" and \"Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)\" in a sample of dyads, demonstrating accuracy in such population.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>This is an essential step to raise the level of evidence of the studied ND from NANDA-I terminology. Furthermore, this study has potential to contribute to improving nurse's clinical reasoning on breastfeeding, as well as to highlight that women can present simultaneously the two diagnoses, so naming them is useful to identify mothers more likely to breastfeed and those who will need more differentiated interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To clinically validate the NANDA International (NANDA-I), nursing diagnoses (ND) of "Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)" and "Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)" in postpartum women and their infants, and to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of their elements.

Methods: Cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2023 to April 2024. Recruitment happened at a public teaching hospital, approaching dyads from the neonatology outpatient clinic and the rooming-in. The researcher applied the tool, assessed the dyad and medical records. Statistical analysis was based on accuracy measures and inferential statistics. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee.

Findings: The sample comprised 205 Brazilian dyads: 57 (27.80%) presented "Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)," whereas 203 (99.02%) presented the "Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)." "Unsustained sucking on the breast" was the most sensitive defining characteristic (DC) for the "Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)." All the DCs of "Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)" showed relevant sensitivity.

Conclusions: Findings validated the presence of NANDA-I ND "Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)" and "Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)" in a sample of dyads, demonstrating accuracy in such population.

Implications for nursing practice: This is an essential step to raise the level of evidence of the studied ND from NANDA-I terminology. Furthermore, this study has potential to contribute to improving nurse's clinical reasoning on breastfeeding, as well as to highlight that women can present simultaneously the two diagnoses, so naming them is useful to identify mothers more likely to breastfeed and those who will need more differentiated interventions.

"无效母乳喂养(00104)"和 "准备加强母乳喂养(00106)":临床验证。
目的:在产后妇女及其婴儿中临床验证 NANDA 国际(NANDA-I)的护理诊断(ND)"无效母乳喂养(00104)"和 "准备加强母乳喂养(00106)",并确定其敏感性、特异性和预测价值:横断面研究于 2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 4 月进行。研究人员在一家公立教学医院进行了招募,从新生儿科门诊和住院病房中招募研究对象。研究人员使用该工具,对二人组和医疗记录进行评估。统计分析基于准确性测量和推理统计。该研究获得了伦理委员会的批准:样本包括 205 个巴西夫妇:57对(占27.80%)显示 "母乳喂养效果不佳(00104)",而203对(占99.02%)显示 "已做好加强母乳喂养的准备(00106)"。"持续吸吮乳房 "是 "无效母乳喂养(00104)"最敏感的定义特征(DC)。所有 "准备加强母乳喂养(00106)"的定义特征都显示出相关的敏感性:结论:研究结果验证了 NANDA-I ND "无效母乳喂养(00104)"和 "加强母乳喂养的准备(00106)"在双亲样本中的存在,证明了其在此类人群中的准确性:这是将所研究的 ND 从 NANDA-I 术语提升到证据级别的重要一步。此外,这项研究有可能有助于提高护士在母乳喂养方面的临床推理能力,并强调妇女可能同时出现这两种诊断,因此命名这两种诊断有助于识别更有可能进行母乳喂养的母亲和需要更有区别的干预措施的母亲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信