A comparative analysis of axial and appendicular skeletal maturity staging systems through assessment of longitudinal growth and curve modulation after VBT surgery.

Abstract

Purpose: Appendicular skeleton markers are commonly used for maturity assessment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients. Traditionally, Risser has been a standard skeletal maturity assessment method. More recently, Sanders classification (SSMS), as a more comprehensive system, became popular, especially in decision-making for Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT). Thumb-Ossification Composite Index (TOCI), using ossification of thumb epiphyses, has been claimed to more accurately stage patients around their peak height velocity. However, growth peaks may occur separately at lower limbs and trunk. Hence, Cervical Vertebral Maturity (CVM), using cervical spine morphology, possesses a potential to better estimate spinal growth as it uses axial skeleton markers instead of appendicular skeleton markers. The aim of the study was to compare various axial and appendicular skeletal maturity assessment methods for longitudinal growth and curve modulation after VBT.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. Skeletal maturity was determined using Risser, SSMS, TOCI and CVM for each patient. Crosstabulations of axial vs. appendicular markers were formed to analyze their concordance and discordance. Logistic and logarithmic regression models were run to assess longitudinal growth (postoperative height gain and leg-length growth) and curve modulation (follow-up instrumented Cobb correction after index operation), respectively. Models were compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC).

Results: 34 patients (32 F/2 M, mean age: 12.8 ± 1.5 years, mean follow-up: 47.7 (24-80) months) were included. The median preoperative maturity stages were: Risser: 1 (-1-4), SSMS: 4 (1-7), TOCI: 6 (1-8) and CVM: 4 (1-6). At latest follow-up, all patients reached skeletal maturity. Concordance and discordance were observed between axial vs. appendicular systems that demonstrated a range of possible distributions of CVM, where trunk peak height velocity occurred before, simultaneously with or after the standing height peak height velocity. R-squared values for Risser, SSMS, TOCI and CVM were 0.701, 0.783, 0.810 and 0.811, respectively, for prediction of final height; 0.759, 0.821, 0.831 and 0.775 for final leg-length, and 0.507, 0.588, 0.668 and 0.673 for curve modulation. Delta AIC values demonstrated that different skeletal maturity assessment methods provided distinctive information regarding follow-up height gain, leg-length growth and curve behavior.

Conclusions: Risser score provided considerably less information for all three outcome variables. TOCI and SSMS provided substantial information regarding remaining leg-length assessments, while in terms of assessment of total height gain and curve modulation after surgery, CVM and TOCI offered substantial information and SSMS offered strong information. Mutual use of axial and appendicular markers may provide valuable insight concerning timing of surgery and magnitude of surgical correction.