Impact of encounters on patient app use: results of a tethered mobile personal health record usage pattern analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yae Won Tak, Jeong-Hoon Kim, Jae-Ho Lee, Yura Lee
{"title":"Impact of encounters on patient app use: results of a tethered mobile personal health record usage pattern analysis.","authors":"Yae Won Tak, Jeong-Hoon Kim, Jae-Ho Lee, Yura Lee","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11881-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The adoption of tethered mobile personal health records provides not only medical information to patients but also various convenience functions related to hospital use, thereby increasing accessibility to healthcare services and promoting patient engagement. We analyse the tethered mobile personal health records app's usage logs to determine how it can contribute to improving medical service accessibility and patient engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Log data, that comprised menu type, log time, and date, were collected from the mobile personal health records app of a tertiary referral hospital. Clinical information, including patients' demographics and visit type, was collected from the clinical research warehouse system. The usage log was analysed in terms of the type of visit, service function, and time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outpatients accounted for 34% of the total app usage and was the most app-accessed visit type. The most utilized menu functions were lab test and visit schedule for visits or non-visits. For Inpatient and Health check-ups, menu usage patterns showed a focus on lab test results. While investigations and other menu usage showed double peaks in the morning and afternoon, peak usage of lab test results correlated with inpatient blood sampling times, which was around 9 am.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>App menus to access health information, particularly blood tests, emerged as the most accessed menu. Hence, when compared with blood sampling times and hospital information system usage patterns, encounters occurring in the hospital majorly impacted patient app use. For improved patient engagement, improving lab test function should be the priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11881-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The adoption of tethered mobile personal health records provides not only medical information to patients but also various convenience functions related to hospital use, thereby increasing accessibility to healthcare services and promoting patient engagement. We analyse the tethered mobile personal health records app's usage logs to determine how it can contribute to improving medical service accessibility and patient engagement.

Methods: Log data, that comprised menu type, log time, and date, were collected from the mobile personal health records app of a tertiary referral hospital. Clinical information, including patients' demographics and visit type, was collected from the clinical research warehouse system. The usage log was analysed in terms of the type of visit, service function, and time period.

Results: Outpatients accounted for 34% of the total app usage and was the most app-accessed visit type. The most utilized menu functions were lab test and visit schedule for visits or non-visits. For Inpatient and Health check-ups, menu usage patterns showed a focus on lab test results. While investigations and other menu usage showed double peaks in the morning and afternoon, peak usage of lab test results correlated with inpatient blood sampling times, which was around 9 am.

Discussion: App menus to access health information, particularly blood tests, emerged as the most accessed menu. Hence, when compared with blood sampling times and hospital information system usage patterns, encounters occurring in the hospital majorly impacted patient app use. For improved patient engagement, improving lab test function should be the priority.

相遇对患者应用使用的影响:系留移动个人健康记录使用模式分析结果。
导言:系留移动个人健康记录的采用不仅为患者提供了医疗信息,还提供了与医院使用相关的各种便利功能,从而提高了医疗服务的可及性并促进了患者的参与。我们分析了系留移动个人健康记录应用程序的使用日志,以确定它如何有助于提高医疗服务的可及性和患者的参与度:方法:我们从一家三级转诊医院的移动个人健康记录应用中收集了日志数据,包括菜单类型、日志时间和日期。临床信息,包括患者的人口统计数据和就诊类型,从临床研究仓库系统中收集。使用日志按就诊类型、服务功能和时间段进行了分析:结果:门诊病人占应用程序总使用量的 34%,是使用最多的就诊类型。使用率最高的菜单功能是化验和就诊日程安排。对于住院和健康体检,菜单使用模式显示出对化验结果的关注。调查和其他菜单的使用在上午和下午出现双高峰,而化验结果的使用高峰则与住院病人抽血时间相关,即上午9点左右:讨论:获取健康信息(尤其是血液化验)的应用程序菜单是使用率最高的菜单。因此,与抽血时间和医院信息系统的使用模式相比,在医院内发生的事件对患者使用应用程序产生了重大影响。为提高患者参与度,应优先改善实验室测试功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信