The long-term impact of post-cholecystectomy major bile duct injury on liver stiffness.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Avinash Jayasekara, Suchintha B Tillakaratne, Uditha Dasanayake, Shanthamoorthy Gishanthan, Rohan C Siriwardana
{"title":"The long-term impact of post-cholecystectomy major bile duct injury on liver stiffness.","authors":"Avinash Jayasekara, Suchintha B Tillakaratne, Uditha Dasanayake, Shanthamoorthy Gishanthan, Rohan C Siriwardana","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03505-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) are a devastating complication. Long-term impact of corrective hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for such injuries on post -surgery liver stiffness is lacking. Hence the aim of this study was to explore the extent of hepatic fibrosis in a cohort of patients with Strasberg E bile duct injuries who underwent HJ after a minimum follow-up of six months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of 50 BDI presented over a period of 10-years, 19 patients with Strasberg type E, injuries that underwent HJ and completed a minimum 6-month follow-up [65.5 (7 -108)] period were selected. Data were prospectively collected on liver functions and liver stiffness was assessed using a Fibroscan. Their liver stiffness and degree of fibrosis was compared with (n = 38) age, gender and comorbidity matched controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 47 (30-70) years, with 63% females. Primary HJ was performed in 84%, with a median time from injury to HJ of 7 (1-39) days. The total bilirubin was 16.5 (11.2) µmol/L, Alkaline Phosphatase was 102 (27.2) U/L, and Platelet count was 256 (77) x 10<sup>3</sup>. Liver stiffness (median 6.4 kPa) did not significantly differ from controls (5.3 kPa). Fibrosis assessment revealed comparable distribution of F0 to F3 fibrosis between the study and control groups (F0/F1: 68.4% vs. 84.4%, F2: 10.5% vs. 9.4%). However, all three patients with right hepatic artery injury (p = 0.003) and three of five patients with bile duct stricture had F3/F4 fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Major BDI repair demonstrates comparable liver fibrosis in the absence of artery injury and anastomotic strictures. Measuring liver fibrosis could be valuable in the presence of arterial injuries or anastomotic strictures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"24 1","pages":"413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03505-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) are a devastating complication. Long-term impact of corrective hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for such injuries on post -surgery liver stiffness is lacking. Hence the aim of this study was to explore the extent of hepatic fibrosis in a cohort of patients with Strasberg E bile duct injuries who underwent HJ after a minimum follow-up of six months.

Methods: Out of 50 BDI presented over a period of 10-years, 19 patients with Strasberg type E, injuries that underwent HJ and completed a minimum 6-month follow-up [65.5 (7 -108)] period were selected. Data were prospectively collected on liver functions and liver stiffness was assessed using a Fibroscan. Their liver stiffness and degree of fibrosis was compared with (n = 38) age, gender and comorbidity matched controls.

Results: The median age was 47 (30-70) years, with 63% females. Primary HJ was performed in 84%, with a median time from injury to HJ of 7 (1-39) days. The total bilirubin was 16.5 (11.2) µmol/L, Alkaline Phosphatase was 102 (27.2) U/L, and Platelet count was 256 (77) x 103. Liver stiffness (median 6.4 kPa) did not significantly differ from controls (5.3 kPa). Fibrosis assessment revealed comparable distribution of F0 to F3 fibrosis between the study and control groups (F0/F1: 68.4% vs. 84.4%, F2: 10.5% vs. 9.4%). However, all three patients with right hepatic artery injury (p = 0.003) and three of five patients with bile duct stricture had F3/F4 fibrosis.

Conclusions: Major BDI repair demonstrates comparable liver fibrosis in the absence of artery injury and anastomotic strictures. Measuring liver fibrosis could be valuable in the presence of arterial injuries or anastomotic strictures.

胆囊切除术后主要胆管损伤对肝脏硬度的长期影响。
导言:先天性胆管损伤(BDI)是一种破坏性并发症。针对此类损伤的肝空肠吻合术(HJ)对术后肝硬变的长期影响尚不明确。因此,本研究旨在探讨一组接受肝空肠吻合术的斯特拉斯堡E型胆管损伤患者在至少六个月的随访后肝纤维化的程度:方法: 从 50 名 10 年内就诊的 BDI 患者中,选择了 19 名接受 HJ 并完成至少 6 个月随访 [65.5 (7 -108)] 的斯特拉斯堡 E 型胆管损伤患者。前瞻性地收集了肝功能数据,并使用纤维扫描仪评估了肝脏硬度。他们的肝脏硬度和纤维化程度与年龄、性别和合并症相匹配的对照组(n = 38)进行了比较:中位年龄为 47(30-70)岁,女性占 63%。84%的患者进行了原发性 HJ,从受伤到 HJ 的中位时间为 7(1-39)天。总胆红素为 16.5 (11.2) µmol/L,碱性磷酸酶为 102 (27.2) U/L,血小板计数为 256 (77) x 103。肝硬度(中位数 6.4 kPa)与对照组(5.3 kPa)无明显差异。纤维化评估显示,研究组和对照组的 F0 至 F3 纤维化分布相当(F0/F1:68.4% 对 84.4%,F2:10.5% 对 9.4%)。然而,所有三位肝右动脉损伤患者(P = 0.003)和五位胆管狭窄患者中的三位都出现了F3/F4纤维化:结论:在没有动脉损伤和吻合口狭窄的情况下,BDI大修显示出相当的肝纤维化。在有动脉损伤或吻合口狭窄的情况下,测量肝纤维化可能很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信