Overcoming therapeutic inertia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: Protocol of a randomized, quality improvement trial.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Thanh K Thai, Christine A Board, Joshua R Nugent, Jessica L Johnston, Esther Y Huynh, Cindy Hanh Chen, Andy H Chan, Richard W Grant, Lisa K Gilliam, Anjali Gopalan
{"title":"Overcoming therapeutic inertia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: Protocol of a randomized, quality improvement trial.","authors":"Thanh K Thai, Christine A Board, Joshua R Nugent, Jessica L Johnston, Esther Y Huynh, Cindy Hanh Chen, Andy H Chan, Richard W Grant, Lisa K Gilliam, Anjali Gopalan","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic inertia, the delay in the appropriate initiation and intensification of recommended therapies, is a major contributor to the lack of improvement in type 2 diabetes outcomes over the past decade. Therapeutic inertia during the period following diagnosis, when improvements in glycemic control can have lasting benefits, is often overlooked. Technology and team-based care approaches can effectively address therapeutic inertia. Here, we describe the protocol for a randomized, quality improvement trial targeting metformin-related therapeutic inertia among adults with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes and a hemoglobin A1c <8 %. Service areas within an integrated healthcare delivery system were randomized to 1) usual care, 2) physician education on therapeutic inertia, and 3) physician education on therapeutic inertia paired with proactive outreach by a clinical pharmacist. The physician education sessions were offered to primary care providers working in the service areas randomized to Arm 2 and Arm 3, and proactive outreach by a clinical pharmacist was performed for patients of the providers in service areas randomized to Arm 3. Outcomes will be abstracted from the EHR at 6, 12, and 18 months following the physician education sessions. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with an HbA1c <7 % at each of the follow-up time points. Outcome abstraction and analyses will occur in late 2024. This trial seeks to rigorously evaluate care strategies that can shift stagnant type 2 diabetes outcomes. Our protocol, along with the pending results, may offer examples to other healthcare systems working to improve type 2 diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"107751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic inertia, the delay in the appropriate initiation and intensification of recommended therapies, is a major contributor to the lack of improvement in type 2 diabetes outcomes over the past decade. Therapeutic inertia during the period following diagnosis, when improvements in glycemic control can have lasting benefits, is often overlooked. Technology and team-based care approaches can effectively address therapeutic inertia. Here, we describe the protocol for a randomized, quality improvement trial targeting metformin-related therapeutic inertia among adults with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes and a hemoglobin A1c <8 %. Service areas within an integrated healthcare delivery system were randomized to 1) usual care, 2) physician education on therapeutic inertia, and 3) physician education on therapeutic inertia paired with proactive outreach by a clinical pharmacist. The physician education sessions were offered to primary care providers working in the service areas randomized to Arm 2 and Arm 3, and proactive outreach by a clinical pharmacist was performed for patients of the providers in service areas randomized to Arm 3. Outcomes will be abstracted from the EHR at 6, 12, and 18 months following the physician education sessions. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with an HbA1c <7 % at each of the follow-up time points. Outcome abstraction and analyses will occur in late 2024. This trial seeks to rigorously evaluate care strategies that can shift stagnant type 2 diabetes outcomes. Our protocol, along with the pending results, may offer examples to other healthcare systems working to improve type 2 diabetes care.

克服新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗惰性:随机质量改进试验方案。
治疗惰性,即延迟适当启动和加强推荐疗法,是过去十年中 2 型糖尿病治疗效果没有改善的主要原因。确诊后的治疗惰性往往被忽视,而血糖控制的改善却能带来持久的益处。技术和团队护理方法可以有效解决治疗惰性问题。在此,我们介绍一项随机质量改进试验的方案,该试验针对的是新近确诊的 2 型糖尿病患者中与二甲双胍相关的治疗惰性,其血红蛋白 A1c
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信