The Delay of Recanalisation of Acutely Thrombosed Dialysis Arteriovenous Access Until the Next Workday has No Negative Impact on Clinical Outcome.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Konstantin Hellwig, Stefan Zicha, Christoph Kopp, Ulrich Rother, Nikolaos Papatheodorou, Michael Uder, Axel Schmid
{"title":"The Delay of Recanalisation of Acutely Thrombosed Dialysis Arteriovenous Access Until the Next Workday has No Negative Impact on Clinical Outcome.","authors":"Konstantin Hellwig, Stefan Zicha, Christoph Kopp, Ulrich Rother, Nikolaos Papatheodorou, Michael Uder, Axel Schmid","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03897-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The necessity of providing endovascular recanalization of acutely thrombosed arteriovenous access (AV access) during weekend is questionable, since hemodialysis can alternatively be achieved by temporarily placed non-tunneled central venous catheters (CVC). Interventional therapy of acutely thrombosed AV access is provided only on weekdays in the study center. This study aimed to compare outcomes in patients admitted on weekdays and on the weekend.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 355 endovascular procedures for thrombosed AV access performed in a single tertiary center from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed for technical and clinical success, complications, rate of CVC and length of hospitalization. Technical success was defined as adequate blood flow with less than 30% residual stenosis, clinical success was defined as at least one successful hemodialysis after recanalization. There were two groups: patients who had to wait at least 2 days for recanalization due to admission at the weekend (n = 59, at-the-weekend group, ATW group) and patients receiving therapy no later than the day after admission (n = 296, on a working day group, OAW group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical/clinical success rate was 96.6%/88.1% in the ATW and 89.1%/84.6% in the OAW group (p > .05). Complications did not differ among groups (p > .05). Despite a higher rate of CVC, no attributed additional adverse events or complications were observed in the ATW group (p > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a longer time until treatment and a higher rate of short-term CVC, it seems to be justified to provide recanalization of dialysis shunts only during weekdays.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03897-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The necessity of providing endovascular recanalization of acutely thrombosed arteriovenous access (AV access) during weekend is questionable, since hemodialysis can alternatively be achieved by temporarily placed non-tunneled central venous catheters (CVC). Interventional therapy of acutely thrombosed AV access is provided only on weekdays in the study center. This study aimed to compare outcomes in patients admitted on weekdays and on the weekend.

Methods: A total of 355 endovascular procedures for thrombosed AV access performed in a single tertiary center from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed for technical and clinical success, complications, rate of CVC and length of hospitalization. Technical success was defined as adequate blood flow with less than 30% residual stenosis, clinical success was defined as at least one successful hemodialysis after recanalization. There were two groups: patients who had to wait at least 2 days for recanalization due to admission at the weekend (n = 59, at-the-weekend group, ATW group) and patients receiving therapy no later than the day after admission (n = 296, on a working day group, OAW group).

Results: The technical/clinical success rate was 96.6%/88.1% in the ATW and 89.1%/84.6% in the OAW group (p > .05). Complications did not differ among groups (p > .05). Despite a higher rate of CVC, no attributed additional adverse events or complications were observed in the ATW group (p > .05).

Conclusion: Despite a longer time until treatment and a higher rate of short-term CVC, it seems to be justified to provide recanalization of dialysis shunts only during weekdays.

将急性血栓性透析动静脉通路再通畅手术推迟到下一个工作日不会对临床结果产生负面影响。
目的:在周末对急性血栓形成的动静脉通路(AV 通路)进行血管内再通的必要性值得怀疑,因为血液透析可以通过临时放置的非隧道式中心静脉导管(CVC)来实现。研究中心仅在工作日对急性血栓形成的动静脉通路进行介入治疗。本研究旨在比较工作日和周末入院患者的治疗效果:回顾性分析了2007年至2017年在一家三级中心进行的355例血栓性房室通路血管内手术的技术和临床成功率、并发症、CVC使用率和住院时间。技术成功定义为血流充足且残余狭窄小于30%,临床成功定义为再通后至少成功进行一次血液透析。患者分为两组:因周末入院而需要等待至少两天才能进行再通畅治疗的患者(n = 59,周末组,ATW 组)和在入院次日即接受治疗的患者(n = 296,工作日组,OAW 组):ATW组的技术/临床成功率为96.6%/88.1%,OAW组为89.1%/84.6%(P>0.05)。各组并发症无差异(P > .05)。尽管ATW组的CVC率较高,但未观察到明显的额外不良事件或并发症(P > .05):结论:尽管治疗时间较长,短期 CVC 的发生率较高,但只在工作日对透析分流道进行再通畅似乎是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信