A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Embolisation Outcomes of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yousef Shahin, Cyrilkumaar Vijayakumar, Amarit Gill, Andrzej Lejawka, Steve Bennett, Rebecca Willis, Mustafa Abbas, Daniel Kusumawidjaja
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Embolisation Outcomes of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations.","authors":"Yousef Shahin, Cyrilkumaar Vijayakumar, Amarit Gill, Andrzej Lejawka, Steve Bennett, Rebecca Willis, Mustafa Abbas, Daniel Kusumawidjaja","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03907-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Embolisation is a widely utilised therapeutic intervention for pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM). We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes of PAVM embolisation and factors associated with embolisation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from 2000 to July 2022 on studies that assessed embolisation outcomes of PAVM. Immediate technical success rate defined as the complete occlusion of the PAVM at the time of embolisation and treatment success rate defined as ≥ 70% venous sac reduction on follow-up imaging were pooled from included studies with use of random effects proportion meta-analysis. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four studies including 1865 patients (604 (32%) males, mean age (range) 45 (24-59) years, 1125 (60%) had hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT)) were included in the meta-analysis. Studies included a total of 4314 PAVMs of which 4047 (94%) were treated. Studies reported morphology of 3074 PAVMs (2519 (58%) simple and 555 (13%) complex). The pooled overall immediate technical success rate for PAVM embolisation was 99%, 95% CI (98-100%) and the treatment success rate was 86%, 95% CI (84-89%). Younger age (p = 0.041), simple PAVM (0.020), and embolisation using plugs (p = 0.001) were associated with higher treatment success. Feeding artery and sac embolisation (p = 0.021) and using coils (p = 0.001) were associated with lower treatment success. There was no significant difference in recanalisation rate between different embolisation agents (OR 0.64, 95% CI -0.09- 1.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis shows that PAVM embolisation is safe and effective. Higher treatment success rates for PAVM embolisation can be achieved using plugs as the primary embolisation agent. Embolisation agent used had no effect on recanalisation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03907-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Embolisation is a widely utilised therapeutic intervention for pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM). We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes of PAVM embolisation and factors associated with embolisation outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from 2000 to July 2022 on studies that assessed embolisation outcomes of PAVM. Immediate technical success rate defined as the complete occlusion of the PAVM at the time of embolisation and treatment success rate defined as ≥ 70% venous sac reduction on follow-up imaging were pooled from included studies with use of random effects proportion meta-analysis. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with the I2 statistic.

Results: Forty-four studies including 1865 patients (604 (32%) males, mean age (range) 45 (24-59) years, 1125 (60%) had hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT)) were included in the meta-analysis. Studies included a total of 4314 PAVMs of which 4047 (94%) were treated. Studies reported morphology of 3074 PAVMs (2519 (58%) simple and 555 (13%) complex). The pooled overall immediate technical success rate for PAVM embolisation was 99%, 95% CI (98-100%) and the treatment success rate was 86%, 95% CI (84-89%). Younger age (p = 0.041), simple PAVM (0.020), and embolisation using plugs (p = 0.001) were associated with higher treatment success. Feeding artery and sac embolisation (p = 0.021) and using coils (p = 0.001) were associated with lower treatment success. There was no significant difference in recanalisation rate between different embolisation agents (OR 0.64, 95% CI -0.09- 1.38).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that PAVM embolisation is safe and effective. Higher treatment success rates for PAVM embolisation can be achieved using plugs as the primary embolisation agent. Embolisation agent used had no effect on recanalisation rates.

肺动静脉畸形栓塞疗效的 Meta 分析和 Meta 回归。
目的:栓塞是一种广泛应用于肺动静脉畸形(PAVM)的治疗干预措施。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估肺动静脉畸形栓塞术的效果以及与栓塞效果相关的因素:方法:检索了 2000 年至 2022 年 7 月期间在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 上对 PAVM 栓塞效果进行评估的研究。采用随机效应比例荟萃分析法从纳入的研究中汇总了即时技术成功率(定义为栓塞时 PAVM 完全闭塞)和治疗成功率(定义为随访成像中静脉囊缩小≥ 70%)。研究间的异质性用I2统计量进行评估:荟萃分析共纳入 44 项研究,包括 1865 名患者(604 名(32%)男性,平均年龄(范围)45(24-59)岁,1125 名(60%)患有遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症(HHT))。研究共纳入 4314 例 PAVM,其中 4047 例(94%)接受了治疗。研究报告了 3074 例 PAVM 的形态(2519 例(58%)为单纯型,555 例(13%)为复杂型)。PAVM栓塞的总体即时技术成功率为99%,95% CI (98-100%),治疗成功率为86%,95% CI (84-89%)。年龄较小(p = 0.041)、单纯 PAVM(0.020)和使用栓塞栓塞(p = 0.001)与较高的治疗成功率相关。供血动脉和囊栓塞(p = 0.021)和使用线圈(p = 0.001)与治疗成功率较低有关。不同栓塞剂之间的再通率无明显差异(OR 0.64,95% CI -0.09-1.38):这项荟萃分析表明,PAVM栓塞是安全有效的。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,PAVM栓塞术是安全有效的,使用栓塞剂作为主要栓塞剂可提高PAVM栓塞术的治疗成功率。所使用的栓塞剂对再通率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信