Surgical management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: systematic review of current practices and open questions

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sergio Garcia-Garcia, Hrvoje Barić, Mika Niemelä
{"title":"Surgical management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: systematic review of current practices and open questions","authors":"Sergio Garcia-Garcia,&nbsp;Hrvoje Barić,&nbsp;Mika Niemelä","doi":"10.1007/s00701-024-06360-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae(sDAVF) represent the most common spinal vascular malformation. Therapeutic strategies include both surgical and endovascular approaches. Surgical interruption of the fistula is crucial to prevent the onset and progression of neurological symptoms. Despite a range of surgical techniques, little research has evaluated their relative efficacy. This review aims to summarize the available surgical techniques and identify open questions for future research.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases to identify surgically treated cohorts of sDAVF. Five commonly reported surgical steps were analyzed: type of approach, temporary clipping, shunt disruption method, fistulous vein management, and epidural vessel management. In addition, open questions lacking consensus or evidence were identified for pre, intra and postoperative stages.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>63 of 115 analyzed cohorts described surgical techniques. The most commonly used approach was single-level laminectomy (52.4%). Temporary clipping was used in 11.1% of cases, while 15.9% of studies reported excision of intradural arterialized veins. There was wide variation in the methods used to close the fistula, with the most frequent being coagulation alone (27.5%). The management of epidural vessels was reported in 11.1% of studies. Sixteen major open questions were identified with a wide variety of technical nuances.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Surgical treatment of sDAVF is not a standardized procedure but rather encompasses significantly different techniques. The lack of controlled trials leaves many questions unanswered, including optimal surgical strategies and the role of adjunct imaging and monitoring techniques. Further research is required to address these gaps and refine treatment protocols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-024-06360-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae(sDAVF) represent the most common spinal vascular malformation. Therapeutic strategies include both surgical and endovascular approaches. Surgical interruption of the fistula is crucial to prevent the onset and progression of neurological symptoms. Despite a range of surgical techniques, little research has evaluated their relative efficacy. This review aims to summarize the available surgical techniques and identify open questions for future research.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases to identify surgically treated cohorts of sDAVF. Five commonly reported surgical steps were analyzed: type of approach, temporary clipping, shunt disruption method, fistulous vein management, and epidural vessel management. In addition, open questions lacking consensus or evidence were identified for pre, intra and postoperative stages.

Results

63 of 115 analyzed cohorts described surgical techniques. The most commonly used approach was single-level laminectomy (52.4%). Temporary clipping was used in 11.1% of cases, while 15.9% of studies reported excision of intradural arterialized veins. There was wide variation in the methods used to close the fistula, with the most frequent being coagulation alone (27.5%). The management of epidural vessels was reported in 11.1% of studies. Sixteen major open questions were identified with a wide variety of technical nuances.

Discussion

Surgical treatment of sDAVF is not a standardized procedure but rather encompasses significantly different techniques. The lack of controlled trials leaves many questions unanswered, including optimal surgical strategies and the role of adjunct imaging and monitoring techniques. Further research is required to address these gaps and refine treatment protocols.

脊髓硬膜动静脉瘘的手术治疗:当前做法和未决问题的系统回顾。
背景:脊髓硬膜动静脉瘘(sDAVF)是最常见的脊髓血管畸形。治疗策略包括手术和血管内治疗。手术阻断瘘管对于预防神经症状的出现和发展至关重要。尽管手术技术多种多样,但很少有研究对其相对疗效进行评估。本综述旨在总结现有的手术技术,并确定未来研究的开放性问题:方法:我们在 PubMed、Ovid 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统性回顾,以确定接受过手术治疗的 sDAVF 患者群。分析了五种常见的手术步骤:入路类型、临时剪切、分流中断方法、瘘管静脉处理和硬膜外血管处理。此外,还确定了术前、术中和术后各阶段缺乏共识或证据的开放性问题:结果:115 个分析队列中有 63 个描述了手术技术。最常用的方法是单层椎板切除术(52.4%)。11.1%的病例使用了临时剪切术,15.9%的研究报告称切除了硬膜内动脉化静脉。关闭瘘管的方法差异很大,最常见的是单纯凝固法(27.5%)。11.1%的研究报告了硬膜外血管的处理方法。研究中发现了16个主要的开放性问题,这些问题在技术上存在各种细微差别:讨论:sDAVF 的手术治疗并非标准化程序,而是包含了多种不同的技术。由于缺乏对照试验,许多问题仍未得到解答,包括最佳手术策略以及辅助成像和监测技术的作用。要弥补这些不足并完善治疗方案,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信