Removal of nutrients from synthetic wastewater by different Brazilian chlorophyte strains in batch bioreactors under various light regimes

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gabriel Bolani, Caio Roberto Soares Bragança, Sarah Regina Vargas
{"title":"Removal of nutrients from synthetic wastewater by different Brazilian chlorophyte strains in batch bioreactors under various light regimes","authors":"Gabriel Bolani,&nbsp;Caio Roberto Soares Bragança,&nbsp;Sarah Regina Vargas","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13389-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increase in pollution and improper waste disposal, aquatic ecosystems are experiencing escalating degradation leading to various detrimental effects, including eutrophication and adverse impacts on the health of the population reliant on these water resources. Consequently, microalgae have demonstrated efficacy in nutrient removal, minimal environmental disruption, and superior cost-effectiveness in comparison to traditional treatment methods. Thus, this study aimed to investigate wastewater treatment in an aerobic batch system, using two strains of non-axenic mixotrophic chlorophytes, <i>Chlorella</i> sp. and <i>Desmodesmus</i> sp., across distinct light regimes: continuous light exposure for 24 h, a photoperiod of 12 h light and 12 h darkness, and complete absence of light for 24 h. The <i>Desmodesmus</i> sp. strain exhibited superior efficiency in the proposed biological treatment, yielding more favorable nutrient removal results across all conditions, except for total nitrogen removal under the 24-h continuous light condition in which <i>Chlorella</i> sp. removed 0.199 ± 0.02% by biomass. In other parameters, <i>Desmodesmus</i> sp., remediated by biomass 0.408 ± 0.013% of inorganic phosphorus in 24 h light, 0.372 ± 0.011% of COD and 0.416 ± 0.004% of carbohydrate in 24 h dark. While <i>Chlorella</i> sp. removed 0.221 ± 0.01% of inorganic phosphorus in 24 h light, 0.164 ± 0.02% of COD in 24 h light and 0.214 ± 0.002% of carbohydrates in 24 h dark. Nevertheless, both strains displayed potential as viable alternatives for wastewater biological treatment, indicating that nutrient removal is achievable across all tested light conditions, albeit with variations in efficiency depending on the specific nutrient type.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"196 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13389-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increase in pollution and improper waste disposal, aquatic ecosystems are experiencing escalating degradation leading to various detrimental effects, including eutrophication and adverse impacts on the health of the population reliant on these water resources. Consequently, microalgae have demonstrated efficacy in nutrient removal, minimal environmental disruption, and superior cost-effectiveness in comparison to traditional treatment methods. Thus, this study aimed to investigate wastewater treatment in an aerobic batch system, using two strains of non-axenic mixotrophic chlorophytes, Chlorella sp. and Desmodesmus sp., across distinct light regimes: continuous light exposure for 24 h, a photoperiod of 12 h light and 12 h darkness, and complete absence of light for 24 h. The Desmodesmus sp. strain exhibited superior efficiency in the proposed biological treatment, yielding more favorable nutrient removal results across all conditions, except for total nitrogen removal under the 24-h continuous light condition in which Chlorella sp. removed 0.199 ± 0.02% by biomass. In other parameters, Desmodesmus sp., remediated by biomass 0.408 ± 0.013% of inorganic phosphorus in 24 h light, 0.372 ± 0.011% of COD and 0.416 ± 0.004% of carbohydrate in 24 h dark. While Chlorella sp. removed 0.221 ± 0.01% of inorganic phosphorus in 24 h light, 0.164 ± 0.02% of COD in 24 h light and 0.214 ± 0.002% of carbohydrates in 24 h dark. Nevertheless, both strains displayed potential as viable alternatives for wastewater biological treatment, indicating that nutrient removal is achievable across all tested light conditions, albeit with variations in efficiency depending on the specific nutrient type.

Abstract Image

在不同光照条件下,批式生物反应器中不同的巴西叶绿体菌株去除合成废水中的营养物质。
随着污染的加剧和废物处理不当,水生生态系统正经历着不断升级的退化,导致各种有害影响,包括富营养化和对依赖这些水资源的人口健康的不利影响。因此,与传统的处理方法相比,微藻具有去除营养物质的功效,对环境的破坏最小,成本效益更高。因此,本研究旨在研究在好氧批处理系统中,使用两株非轴向混养叶绿藻 Chlorella sp、除了在 24 小时连续光照条件下小球藻对总氮的去除率为 0.199 ± 0.02%(按生物量计算)外,在所有条件下,Desmodesmus sp. 菌株在拟议的生物处理中表现出更高的效率,获得了更有利的营养物去除结果。在其他参数方面,Desmodesmus sp. 在 24 小时光照条件下,其生物量对无机磷的去除率为 0.408 ± 0.013%;在 24 小时黑暗条件下,其生物量对 COD 的去除率为 0.372 ± 0.011%;在 24 小时黑暗条件下,其生物量对碳水化合物的去除率为 0.416 ± 0.004%。而小球藻在 24 小时光照条件下去除 0.221 ± 0.01% 的无机磷,在 24 小时光照条件下去除 0.164 ± 0.02% 的化学需氧量,在 24 小时黑暗条件下去除 0.214 ± 0.002% 的碳水化合物。尽管如此,这两种菌株都显示出了作为废水生物处理可行替代品的潜力,表明在所有测试的光照条件下都能实现营养物质的去除,只是效率因具体营养物质类型而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信