Family Socioeconomic Status and Neurodevelopment Among Patients With Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Adam R Cassidy, Valerie Rofeberg, Emily M Bucholz, David C Bellinger, David Wypij, Jane W Newburger
{"title":"Family Socioeconomic Status and Neurodevelopment Among Patients With Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries.","authors":"Adam R Cassidy, Valerie Rofeberg, Emily M Bucholz, David C Bellinger, David Wypij, Jane W Newburger","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Data are limited on the longitudinal implications of socioeconomic status (SES) for neurodevelopmental outcomes among persons with complex congenital heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association of family SES, maternal educational level, and maternal IQ with the neurodevelopment of individuals with dextro-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) from age 1 to 16 years and to identify how SES-related disparities change with age.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study analyzed data of participants enrolled in the Boston Circulatory Arrest Study, a randomized clinical trial conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, from 1988 to 1992. Participants were infants with d-TGA who underwent arterial switch operation and, after operation, underwent in-person neurodevelopmental status evaluations at ages 1, 4, 8, and 16 years. Analyses were conducted from April 2021 to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Mean Hollingshead scores at birth, age 1 year, and age 4 years were used to assign participants to SES tertiles (lowest, middle, or highest).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Age-appropriate neurodevelopmental outcomes assessed at 4 study time points (ages 1, 4, 8, and 16 years) via in-person administration of a range of well-validated measures. Standardized neurodevelopmental composite scores from each evaluation were derived from principal component analysis and compared across SES tertiles, adjusting for birth and medical characteristics. These scores were used to categorize the sample into latent classes; patient and medical factors for a 3-class model were used to estimate latent class using multinomial regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 164 patients with d-TGA (123 males [75%]; mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 39.8 [1.2] weeks; 3 with Asian [2%], 6 with Black [4%], 5 with Hispanic [3%], and 146 with White [89%] race and ethnicity) and their mothers (mean [SD] age at birth, 28.5 [5.2] years). Lower SES tertile was associated with worse scores on most individual neurodevelopmental tests and worse neurodevelopmental composite scores at ages 4, 8, and 16 years. For example, mean (SD) neurodevelopmental composite scores at age 4 years were -0.49 [0.83] for lowest, 0.00 [0.81] for middle, and 0.47 [1.10] for highest SES tertile (F2 = 15.5; P < .001). When measured at consecutive time points, differences between SES tertiles were of similar magnitude. A latent class analysis produced 2- and 3-class models representing patients with stable (103 [64%] and 85 [53%]), improving (20 [13%]), and declining (57 [36%] and 55 [34%]) neurodevelopmental status. Those experiencing declines in neurodevelopmental status were more likely to have younger maternal age at childbirth (26.6 [5.1] vs 29.6 [4.9] and 29.1 [5.1] years; P = .002), lower maternal IQ (91.0 [14.1] vs 100.1 [11.1] and 96.2 [11.0]; P < .001), and lower SES (35.2 [10.8] vs 40.9 [9.9] and 35.8 [10.1]; P = .003) compared with those with stable or improving status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort study of individuals with d-TGA found an association between lower family SES and worse neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood and continuing throughout adolescence as well as greater decline in neurodevelopmental status over time. Effective strategies are needed to improve access to neurodevelopmental monitoring and intervention services for children with CHD from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2445863"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45863","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Data are limited on the longitudinal implications of socioeconomic status (SES) for neurodevelopmental outcomes among persons with complex congenital heart disease (CHD).

Objectives: To examine the association of family SES, maternal educational level, and maternal IQ with the neurodevelopment of individuals with dextro-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) from age 1 to 16 years and to identify how SES-related disparities change with age.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study analyzed data of participants enrolled in the Boston Circulatory Arrest Study, a randomized clinical trial conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, from 1988 to 1992. Participants were infants with d-TGA who underwent arterial switch operation and, after operation, underwent in-person neurodevelopmental status evaluations at ages 1, 4, 8, and 16 years. Analyses were conducted from April 2021 to August 2024.

Exposures: Mean Hollingshead scores at birth, age 1 year, and age 4 years were used to assign participants to SES tertiles (lowest, middle, or highest).

Main outcomes and measures: Age-appropriate neurodevelopmental outcomes assessed at 4 study time points (ages 1, 4, 8, and 16 years) via in-person administration of a range of well-validated measures. Standardized neurodevelopmental composite scores from each evaluation were derived from principal component analysis and compared across SES tertiles, adjusting for birth and medical characteristics. These scores were used to categorize the sample into latent classes; patient and medical factors for a 3-class model were used to estimate latent class using multinomial regression.

Results: The sample included 164 patients with d-TGA (123 males [75%]; mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 39.8 [1.2] weeks; 3 with Asian [2%], 6 with Black [4%], 5 with Hispanic [3%], and 146 with White [89%] race and ethnicity) and their mothers (mean [SD] age at birth, 28.5 [5.2] years). Lower SES tertile was associated with worse scores on most individual neurodevelopmental tests and worse neurodevelopmental composite scores at ages 4, 8, and 16 years. For example, mean (SD) neurodevelopmental composite scores at age 4 years were -0.49 [0.83] for lowest, 0.00 [0.81] for middle, and 0.47 [1.10] for highest SES tertile (F2 = 15.5; P < .001). When measured at consecutive time points, differences between SES tertiles were of similar magnitude. A latent class analysis produced 2- and 3-class models representing patients with stable (103 [64%] and 85 [53%]), improving (20 [13%]), and declining (57 [36%] and 55 [34%]) neurodevelopmental status. Those experiencing declines in neurodevelopmental status were more likely to have younger maternal age at childbirth (26.6 [5.1] vs 29.6 [4.9] and 29.1 [5.1] years; P = .002), lower maternal IQ (91.0 [14.1] vs 100.1 [11.1] and 96.2 [11.0]; P < .001), and lower SES (35.2 [10.8] vs 40.9 [9.9] and 35.8 [10.1]; P = .003) compared with those with stable or improving status.

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study of individuals with d-TGA found an association between lower family SES and worse neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood and continuing throughout adolescence as well as greater decline in neurodevelopmental status over time. Effective strategies are needed to improve access to neurodevelopmental monitoring and intervention services for children with CHD from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.

大动脉外翻患者的家庭社会经济状况和神经发育状况
重要性:有关社会经济地位(SES)对复杂先天性心脏病(CHD)患者神经发育结果的纵向影响的数据有限:研究大动脉右侧横位(d-TGA)患者从1岁到16岁期间,家庭社会经济地位、母亲教育水平和母亲智商与神经发育的关系,并确定与社会经济地位相关的差异是如何随着年龄的增长而变化的:这项队列研究分析了波士顿循环骤停研究(Boston Circulatory Arrest Study)参与者的数据,该研究是 1988 年至 1992 年在马萨诸塞州波士顿进行的一项随机临床试验。参与者均为接受动脉转换手术的 d-TGA 婴儿,术后分别在 1 岁、4 岁、8 岁和 16 岁时接受了当面神经发育状况评估。分析时间为 2021 年 4 月至 2024 年 8 月:出生时、1 岁时和 4 岁时的霍林斯海德(Hollingshead)平均得分被用来将参与者分配到社会经济地位三分位(最低、中等或最高):在 4 个研究时间点(1 岁、4 岁、8 岁和 16 岁),通过亲自实施一系列经过严格验证的测量方法,评估与年龄相适应的神经发育结果。通过主成分分析得出每次评估的标准化神经发育综合得分,并在调整出生和医疗特征后,在社会经济地位三分位数之间进行比较。这些分数被用于将样本划分为潜在类别;使用多项式回归法估算三类模型中的患者和医疗因素的潜在类别:样本包括164名d-TGA患者(123名男性[75%];平均[标码]出生胎龄为39.8[1.2]周;3名亚裔[2%]、6名黑人[4%]、5名西班牙裔[3%]和146名白人[89%])及其母亲(平均[标码]出生年龄为28.5[5.2]岁)。较低的社会经济地位三分位数与大多数单项神经发育测试得分较差以及 4 岁、8 岁和 16 岁时神经发育综合得分较差有关。例如,4 岁时神经发育综合评分的平均值(标清)为:社会经济地位最低的三等分组为 -0.49 [0.83],社会经济地位中等的三等分组为 0.00 [0.81],社会经济地位最高的三等分组为 0.47 [1.10](F2 = 15.5;P 结论及意义:这项针对 d-TGA 患者的队列研究发现,较低的家庭经济地位与儿童期和整个青春期较差的神经发育结果之间存在关联,而且随着时间的推移,神经发育状况的下降幅度也更大。我们需要制定有效的策略,以改善社会经济背景较低的 CHD 患儿获得神经发育监测和干预服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信