Research and scholarly methods: Research collaboration

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Susan E. Smith Pharm.D., Christopher M. Bland Pharm.D., FCCP, Trisha N. Branan Pharm.D., Andrea Sikora Pharm.D., MSCR, FCCP, William Anthony Hawkins Pharm.D.
{"title":"Research and scholarly methods: Research collaboration","authors":"Susan E. Smith Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Christopher M. Bland Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Trisha N. Branan Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Andrea Sikora Pharm.D., MSCR, FCCP,&nbsp;William Anthony Hawkins Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.2041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pursuit of research and scholarly productivity is critical for clinician scientists, yet achieving impactful outcomes often necessitates collaboration within a well-structured team. This review explores the foundational elements of team building that support sustained research productivity among health care professionals and academicians. Drawing on principles from team science, the importance of establishing a shared vision and mission, fostering authentic relationships, and creating an efficient infrastructure to enhance and sustain collaborative efforts is discussed. The four stages of team development—forming, storming, norming, and performing—are examined to provide insights into the dynamic nature of teamwork. Emphasizing the need for intentional practices, we highlight methods for identifying and integrating team members, managing conflicts, and leveraging diverse skill sets to achieve collective goals. Best practices for sustaining research teams, including the implementation of SMART (Specific, Measurable, Assignable, Realistic, Time-related) goals, regular retreats, and strategic alignment of activities to maximize output are also discussed. Two collaborative teams are used as exemplars to illustrate the successful application of these principles, resulting in significant scholarly output. By understanding and applying the concepts of team building, clinician scientists can enhance their research output, contribute to the advancement of health care, and achieve a fulfilling and sustainable career.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 11","pages":"1122-1132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.2041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pursuit of research and scholarly productivity is critical for clinician scientists, yet achieving impactful outcomes often necessitates collaboration within a well-structured team. This review explores the foundational elements of team building that support sustained research productivity among health care professionals and academicians. Drawing on principles from team science, the importance of establishing a shared vision and mission, fostering authentic relationships, and creating an efficient infrastructure to enhance and sustain collaborative efforts is discussed. The four stages of team development—forming, storming, norming, and performing—are examined to provide insights into the dynamic nature of teamwork. Emphasizing the need for intentional practices, we highlight methods for identifying and integrating team members, managing conflicts, and leveraging diverse skill sets to achieve collective goals. Best practices for sustaining research teams, including the implementation of SMART (Specific, Measurable, Assignable, Realistic, Time-related) goals, regular retreats, and strategic alignment of activities to maximize output are also discussed. Two collaborative teams are used as exemplars to illustrate the successful application of these principles, resulting in significant scholarly output. By understanding and applying the concepts of team building, clinician scientists can enhance their research output, contribute to the advancement of health care, and achieve a fulfilling and sustainable career.

Abstract Image

研究和学术方法:研究合作
追求研究和学术生产力对临床科学家来说至关重要,然而要取得有影响力的成果,往往需要在一个结构合理的团队中开展合作。本综述探讨了团队建设的基本要素,这些要素可支持医护专业人员和院士持续提高研究效率。根据团队科学的原则,讨论了建立共同愿景和使命、培养真实关系以及创建高效基础设施以加强和维持合作努力的重要性。对团队发展的四个阶段--形成、风暴、规范和执行--进行了研究,以深入了解团队工作的动态性质。在强调有意识实践的必要性的同时,我们重点介绍了识别和整合团队成员、管理冲突以及利用不同技能组合实现集体目标的方法。此外,我们还讨论了维持研究团队的最佳做法,包括实施 SMART(具体、可衡量、可分配、现实、与时间相关)目标、定期务虚会以及对活动进行战略调整,以最大限度地提高产出。以两个合作团队为例,说明这些原则的成功应用,从而产生了重要的学术成果。通过理解和应用团队建设的概念,临床科学家可以提高他们的研究成果,为医疗保健事业的发展做出贡献,并获得一个充实和可持续的职业生涯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信