{"title":"Error tolerance for effective model parameter estimation in multiaxial fatigue life prediction","authors":"Dariusz Skibicki , Aleksander Karolczuk","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiaxial fatigue life prediction models rely on intrinsic parameters that provide the balance between arbitrary and reference stress/strain conditions. However, this balance may be compromised due to evolving damage mechanisms, causing initially determined model parameters to deviate from actual values, resulting in life prediction errors. Despite the significant impact of fatigue model parameters on prediction accuracy, this issue is often ignored, with many studies assuming constant parameters to simplify prediction algorithms and reduce computational costs. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to quantify the error introduced into fatigue life predictions by approximate methods for determining model parameters under multiaxial loading paths. For the first time, error estimation was conducted using a life-dependent method, revealing that the error is a function of the selected approximation method and the ratio of slope coefficients from S-N curves for torsional versus uniaxial loading. These findings provide a unique framework for selecting computationally efficient approximation methods while balancing life prediction accuracy. This balance is crucial in the design of metallic components using fatigue topology optimization and finite element analysis. The proposed methodology, validated across eight metallic materials subjected to various multiaxial loading paths, offers valuable insights into the trade-offs between computational cost and prediction accuracy, which are essential for optimized structural design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 108700"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112324005590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiaxial fatigue life prediction models rely on intrinsic parameters that provide the balance between arbitrary and reference stress/strain conditions. However, this balance may be compromised due to evolving damage mechanisms, causing initially determined model parameters to deviate from actual values, resulting in life prediction errors. Despite the significant impact of fatigue model parameters on prediction accuracy, this issue is often ignored, with many studies assuming constant parameters to simplify prediction algorithms and reduce computational costs. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to quantify the error introduced into fatigue life predictions by approximate methods for determining model parameters under multiaxial loading paths. For the first time, error estimation was conducted using a life-dependent method, revealing that the error is a function of the selected approximation method and the ratio of slope coefficients from S-N curves for torsional versus uniaxial loading. These findings provide a unique framework for selecting computationally efficient approximation methods while balancing life prediction accuracy. This balance is crucial in the design of metallic components using fatigue topology optimization and finite element analysis. The proposed methodology, validated across eight metallic materials subjected to various multiaxial loading paths, offers valuable insights into the trade-offs between computational cost and prediction accuracy, which are essential for optimized structural design.
期刊介绍:
Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address:
Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements)
Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading
Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions
Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions)
Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects
Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue
Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation)
Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering
Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation
Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.