Heterogenous analysis of KeyBERT, BERTopic, PyCaret and LDAs methods: P53 in ovarian cancer use case

R.O. Oveh , M. Adewunmi , A.O. Solomon , K.Y. Christopher , P.N. Ezeobi
{"title":"Heterogenous analysis of KeyBERT, BERTopic, PyCaret and LDAs methods: P53 in ovarian cancer use case","authors":"R.O. Oveh ,&nbsp;M. Adewunmi ,&nbsp;A.O. Solomon ,&nbsp;K.Y. Christopher ,&nbsp;P.N. Ezeobi","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2024.100182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent times, researchers with Computational background have found it easier to relate to Artificial Intelligence with the advancement of the transformer model, and unstructured medical data. This paper explores the heterogeneity of keyBERT, BERTopic, PyCaret and LDAs as key phrase generators and topic model extractors with P53 in ovarian cancer as a use case. PubMed abstract on mutant p53 was first extracted with the Entrez-global database and then preprocessed with Natural Toolkit (NLTK). keyBERT was then used for extracting keyphrases, and BERTopic modelling was used for extracting the related themes. PyCaret was further used for unigram topics and LDAs for examining the interaction among the topics in the word corpus. Lastly, Jaccard similarity index was used to check the similarity among the four methods. The results showed no relationship exists with KeyBERT, having a score of 0.0 while relationship exists among the three other topic models with score of 0.095, 0.235, 0.4 and 0.111. Based on the result, it was observed that keywords, keyphrases, similar topics, and entities embedded in the data use a closely related framework, which can give insights into medical data before modelling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521224000498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent times, researchers with Computational background have found it easier to relate to Artificial Intelligence with the advancement of the transformer model, and unstructured medical data. This paper explores the heterogeneity of keyBERT, BERTopic, PyCaret and LDAs as key phrase generators and topic model extractors with P53 in ovarian cancer as a use case. PubMed abstract on mutant p53 was first extracted with the Entrez-global database and then preprocessed with Natural Toolkit (NLTK). keyBERT was then used for extracting keyphrases, and BERTopic modelling was used for extracting the related themes. PyCaret was further used for unigram topics and LDAs for examining the interaction among the topics in the word corpus. Lastly, Jaccard similarity index was used to check the similarity among the four methods. The results showed no relationship exists with KeyBERT, having a score of 0.0 while relationship exists among the three other topic models with score of 0.095, 0.235, 0.4 and 0.111. Based on the result, it was observed that keywords, keyphrases, similar topics, and entities embedded in the data use a closely related framework, which can give insights into medical data before modelling.
KeyBERT、BERTopic、PyCaret 和 LDAs 方法的异质性分析:卵巢癌中的 P53 使用案例
近来,具有计算背景的研究人员发现,随着转换器模型和非结构化医疗数据的发展,与人工智能建立联系变得更加容易。本文以卵巢癌 P53 为例,探讨了 keyBERT、BERTopic、PyCaret 和 LDA 作为关键短语生成器和主题模型提取器的异质性。首先使用 Entrez-global 数据库提取有关突变 p53 的 PubMed 摘要,然后使用 Natural Toolkit (NLTK) 进行预处理。PyCaret 用于单字符主题,LDA 用于检查词库中主题之间的交互。最后,使用 Jaccard 相似性指数检查四种方法之间的相似性。结果显示,KeyBERT 与其他三种主题模型之间不存在任何关系,得分为 0.0,而其他三种主题模型之间存在关系,得分为 0.095、0.235、0.4 和 0.111。根据结果可以看出,数据中的关键词、关键短语、相似主题和实体使用了一个密切相关的框架,这可以在建模前对医疗数据进行深入分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信