Performance modeling and comparison of URLLC and eMBB coexistence strategies in 5G new radio systems

IF 4.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Daria Ivanova , Elena Zhbankova , Ekaterina Markova , Yuliya Gaidamaka , Konstantin Samouylov
{"title":"Performance modeling and comparison of URLLC and eMBB coexistence strategies in 5G new radio systems","authors":"Daria Ivanova ,&nbsp;Elena Zhbankova ,&nbsp;Ekaterina Markova ,&nbsp;Yuliya Gaidamaka ,&nbsp;Konstantin Samouylov","doi":"10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Industrial deployments of 5G New Radio (NR) communications are expected to be the first ones, where time-critical communications implemented via ultra-reliable low-latency service (URLLC) will coexist with enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) service on the same radio interface. However, owing to the demanding nature of the former service and principally different traffic patterns, the conventional coexistence techniques based on a complete reservation or complete sharing either result in inefficient usage of radio resources or inability to deliver the required service level. Motivated by the lack of comparison-based studies for URLLC and eMBB coexistence at the air interface that does not affect the current 5G NR multiple access scheme, in this paper, we compare several resource allocation strategies for URLLC and eMBB traffic. To this aim, by utilizing directional antenna array and propagation models, we formulate a general performance assessment framework for a partial sharing coexistence strategy with preemptive and non-preemptive priorities. As this strategy includes several coexistence schemes as its special cases, we then proceed to assess their performance utilizing user- and operator-centric key performance indicators including the session drop and preemption probabilities, and system resource utilization. Our numerical results indicate that utilizing preemption service is vital for efficient coexistence between URLLC and eMBB traffic. Out of all the considered schemes, one of the simplest ones — preemptive priority without resource reservation is characterized by the minimum resource requirements. This scheme allows to achieve 50% gain in terms of the amount of required resources as compared to the strategies without preemption or with complete reservations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50637,"journal":{"name":"Computer Networks","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 110904"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128624007369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industrial deployments of 5G New Radio (NR) communications are expected to be the first ones, where time-critical communications implemented via ultra-reliable low-latency service (URLLC) will coexist with enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) service on the same radio interface. However, owing to the demanding nature of the former service and principally different traffic patterns, the conventional coexistence techniques based on a complete reservation or complete sharing either result in inefficient usage of radio resources or inability to deliver the required service level. Motivated by the lack of comparison-based studies for URLLC and eMBB coexistence at the air interface that does not affect the current 5G NR multiple access scheme, in this paper, we compare several resource allocation strategies for URLLC and eMBB traffic. To this aim, by utilizing directional antenna array and propagation models, we formulate a general performance assessment framework for a partial sharing coexistence strategy with preemptive and non-preemptive priorities. As this strategy includes several coexistence schemes as its special cases, we then proceed to assess their performance utilizing user- and operator-centric key performance indicators including the session drop and preemption probabilities, and system resource utilization. Our numerical results indicate that utilizing preemption service is vital for efficient coexistence between URLLC and eMBB traffic. Out of all the considered schemes, one of the simplest ones — preemptive priority without resource reservation is characterized by the minimum resource requirements. This scheme allows to achieve 50% gain in terms of the amount of required resources as compared to the strategies without preemption or with complete reservations.
5G 新无线电系统中 URLLC 和 eMBB 共存策略的性能建模与比较
5G 新无线电(NR)通信的工业部署预计将是首批部署,通过超可靠低延迟服务(URLLC)实现的时间关键型通信将与增强型移动宽带(eMBB)服务在同一无线电接口上共存。然而,由于前一种服务要求苛刻,而且主要是不同的流量模式,基于完全预留或完全共享的传统共存技术要么导致无线电资源使用效率低下,要么无法提供所需的服务水平。在不影响当前 5G NR 多路接入方案的情况下,空中接口上的 URLLC 和 eMBB 共存缺乏基于比较的研究,受此激励,我们在本文中比较了几种针对 URLLC 和 eMBB 流量的资源分配策略。为此,我们利用定向天线阵列和传播模型,为具有抢占式和非抢占式优先级的部分共享共存策略制定了一个通用性能评估框架。由于该策略包括多个共存方案作为其特例,因此我们接着利用以用户和运营商为中心的关键性能指标(包括会话中断和抢占概率以及系统资源利用率)来评估它们的性能。我们的数值结果表明,利用抢占服务对于 URLLC 和 eMBB 流量的高效共存至关重要。在所有考虑过的方案中,最简单的方案之一--无资源预留的抢占式优先权方案的特点是对资源的要求最低。与没有抢占或完全保留资源的策略相比,该方案可在所需资源量方面实现 50%的增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Networks
Computer Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
434
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Computer Networks is an international, archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in the computer communications networking area. The audience includes researchers, managers and operators of networks as well as designers and implementors. The Editorial Board will consider any material for publication that is of interest to those groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信