Multi-attribute group decision-making method using single-valued neutrosophic credibility numbers with fairly variable extended power average operators and GRA-MARCOS

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Pingqing Liu , Junxin Shen , Peng Zhang , Baoquan Ning
{"title":"Multi-attribute group decision-making method using single-valued neutrosophic credibility numbers with fairly variable extended power average operators and GRA-MARCOS","authors":"Pingqing Liu ,&nbsp;Junxin Shen ,&nbsp;Peng Zhang ,&nbsp;Baoquan Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Data trading platform (DTP) selection is a classic multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem. As an extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), single-valued neutrosophic credibility numbers (SvNCNs) can express both fuzzy evaluation information and the credibility level of the information, offering better expressiveness in describing fuzzy decision-making information. However, existing studies on aggregation operators and decision-making methods in the SvNCN environment are inadequate. Therefore, this paper proposes a MAGDM technique based on the fairly weighted variable extended power average (SvNCNFWVEPA) operators of SvNCNs and grey relational analysis (GRA)-Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) method. The main contributions are as follows: (1) we propose fairly operation rules for aggregating SvNCNs in an unbiased manner; (2) addressing the lack of SvNCN measurement research, we introduce preference distance and entropy measures for SvNCNs, then utilize the entropy measure to compute the objective weights of the attributes; (3) to effectively aggregate SvNCN information, inspired by the variable power geometric (VPG) operators and the extended power average (EPA) operators, we propose the variable extended power average (VEPA) operator for scientifically handling extreme values, extending it to SvNCNs with the SvNCNs fairly variable extended power average (SvNCNFVEPA) operators and their extended form; (4) we introduce the GRA method to calculate the degree of utility of alternatives relative to ideal and anti-ideal alternatives, forming the GRA-MARCOS method. This method can reflect both indicator differences and the similarity of alternatives, thereby rendering the evaluation results more scientific and objective; (5) to illustrate the application of the method to the MAGDM problem, we apply it to the example of DTP selection. Parameter sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis with other existing methods demonstrate that our proposed method is more scientific and flexible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 125703"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424025703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data trading platform (DTP) selection is a classic multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem. As an extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), single-valued neutrosophic credibility numbers (SvNCNs) can express both fuzzy evaluation information and the credibility level of the information, offering better expressiveness in describing fuzzy decision-making information. However, existing studies on aggregation operators and decision-making methods in the SvNCN environment are inadequate. Therefore, this paper proposes a MAGDM technique based on the fairly weighted variable extended power average (SvNCNFWVEPA) operators of SvNCNs and grey relational analysis (GRA)-Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) method. The main contributions are as follows: (1) we propose fairly operation rules for aggregating SvNCNs in an unbiased manner; (2) addressing the lack of SvNCN measurement research, we introduce preference distance and entropy measures for SvNCNs, then utilize the entropy measure to compute the objective weights of the attributes; (3) to effectively aggregate SvNCN information, inspired by the variable power geometric (VPG) operators and the extended power average (EPA) operators, we propose the variable extended power average (VEPA) operator for scientifically handling extreme values, extending it to SvNCNs with the SvNCNs fairly variable extended power average (SvNCNFVEPA) operators and their extended form; (4) we introduce the GRA method to calculate the degree of utility of alternatives relative to ideal and anti-ideal alternatives, forming the GRA-MARCOS method. This method can reflect both indicator differences and the similarity of alternatives, thereby rendering the evaluation results more scientific and objective; (5) to illustrate the application of the method to the MAGDM problem, we apply it to the example of DTP selection. Parameter sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis with other existing methods demonstrate that our proposed method is more scientific and flexible.
使用具有相当可变扩展幂平均数算子的单值中性可信数和 GRA-MARCOS 的多属性群体决策方法
数据交易平台(DTP)选择是一个典型的多属性群体决策(MAGDM)问题。作为直觉模糊集(IFS)的扩展,单值中性可信度数(SvNCN)既能表达模糊评价信息,又能表达信息的可信度,在描述模糊决策信息方面具有更好的表达能力。然而,现有关于 SvNCN 环境下的聚合算子和决策方法的研究并不充分。因此,本文提出了一种基于 SvNCN 的公平加权变量扩展幂平均数(SvNCNFWVEPA)算子和灰色关系分析(GRA)--备选方案衡量与折中方案排序(MARCOS)方法的 MAGDM 技术。主要贡献如下(1) 我们提出了以无偏见方式聚合 SvNCN 的公平操作规则;(2) 针对 SvNCN 测量研究的不足,我们引入了 SvNCN 的偏好距离和熵度量,然后利用熵度量计算属性的客观权重;(3)为有效聚合 SvNCN 信息,受可变几何幂(VPG)算子和扩展平均幂(EPA)算子的启发,我们提出了科学处理极值的可变扩展平均幂(VEPA)算子,并通过 SvNCNs 公平可变扩展平均幂(SvNCNFVEPA)算子及其扩展形式将其扩展到 SvNCN;(4)我们引入 GRA 方法来计算备选方案相对于理想备选方案和反理想备选方案的效用程度,形成 GRA-MARCOS 方法。该方法既能反映指标差异,又能反映备选方案的相似性,从而使评价结果更加科学客观;(5)为了说明该方法在 MAGDM 问题中的应用,我们将其应用于 DTP 选择实例。参数敏感性分析以及与其他现有方法的对比分析表明,我们提出的方法更加科学和灵活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信