A comprehensive techno-economic and environmental comparison of plasma-treated adhesive-bonded thermoplastic composites

IF 3.8 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chiara Mandolfino, Lucia Cassettari, Marco Pizzorni, Luigi Benvenuto, Enrico Lertora
{"title":"A comprehensive techno-economic and environmental comparison of plasma-treated adhesive-bonded thermoplastic composites","authors":"Chiara Mandolfino,&nbsp;Lucia Cassettari,&nbsp;Marco Pizzorni,&nbsp;Luigi Benvenuto,&nbsp;Enrico Lertora","doi":"10.1016/j.jajp.2024.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermoplastic composites are gaining attention for their ability to support a circular economy, shifting away from traditional cost-driven design. Unlike thermoset composites, commonly used in automotive and aerospace sectors, thermoplastic composites offer recyclability, promoting environmental and economic sustainability. Adhesive bonding in thermoplastic composites provides even stress distribution, maintaining structural integrity and reducing delamination risks, which is crucial for lightweight design in transport and renewable energy applications. Optimising adhesive bonded joints is essential to improve structural integrity, efficiency and sustainability. This involves balancing technical, economic and environmental factors, with surface preparation, plasma treatment in particular, playing a key role.</div><div>This paper provides a comprehensive techno-economic-environmental comparison of adhesive bonded joints. The study integrates cost-effectiveness, production efficiency and environmental impact assessments to guide informed decision-making. The methodology includes preparing substrates with low-pressure plasma surface treatments, forming adhesive-bonded joints with different adhesives, and optimising process parameters using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on optimised scenarios enhances Tensile Shear Strength (TSS). The study concludes with a comprehensive comparison, offering insights for resilient, efficient and sustainable engineering solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666330924000840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermoplastic composites are gaining attention for their ability to support a circular economy, shifting away from traditional cost-driven design. Unlike thermoset composites, commonly used in automotive and aerospace sectors, thermoplastic composites offer recyclability, promoting environmental and economic sustainability. Adhesive bonding in thermoplastic composites provides even stress distribution, maintaining structural integrity and reducing delamination risks, which is crucial for lightweight design in transport and renewable energy applications. Optimising adhesive bonded joints is essential to improve structural integrity, efficiency and sustainability. This involves balancing technical, economic and environmental factors, with surface preparation, plasma treatment in particular, playing a key role.
This paper provides a comprehensive techno-economic-environmental comparison of adhesive bonded joints. The study integrates cost-effectiveness, production efficiency and environmental impact assessments to guide informed decision-making. The methodology includes preparing substrates with low-pressure plasma surface treatments, forming adhesive-bonded joints with different adhesives, and optimising process parameters using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on optimised scenarios enhances Tensile Shear Strength (TSS). The study concludes with a comprehensive comparison, offering insights for resilient, efficient and sustainable engineering solutions.
等离子体处理的粘合剂粘结热塑性复合材料的技术经济和环境综合比较
热塑性复合材料能够支持循环经济,摆脱传统的成本驱动型设计,因而备受关注。与汽车和航空航天领域常用的热固性复合材料不同,热塑性复合材料具有可回收性,促进了环境和经济的可持续发展。热塑性复合材料中的粘合剂粘接可提供均匀的应力分布,保持结构完整性并降低分层风险,这对于运输和可再生能源应用领域的轻量化设计至关重要。优化粘合接头对于提高结构完整性、效率和可持续性至关重要。这涉及到技术、经济和环境因素之间的平衡,其中表面处理,尤其是等离子处理起着关键作用。该研究综合了成本效益、生产效率和环境影响评估,为明智决策提供指导。研究方法包括用低压等离子表面处理技术制备基材,用不同的粘合剂形成粘合接头,以及使用响应面方法(RSM)优化工艺参数。对优化方案进行生命周期评估(LCA),以提高拉伸剪切强度(TSS)。研究最后进行了综合比较,为弹性、高效和可持续的工程解决方案提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信