Ricardo H. Deucher , Jacques Franc , Olav Møyner , Hamdi A. Tchelepi
{"title":"Compositional reservoir simulation with a high-resolution compact stencil adaptive implicit method","authors":"Ricardo H. Deucher , Jacques Franc , Olav Møyner , Hamdi A. Tchelepi","doi":"10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adaptive implicit method (AIM) is the mainstream approach for compositional reservoir simulation. In its standard form, AIM uses single-point upwinding to reconstruct the fluxes across the interfaces of the control volume, and this leads to substantial numerical diffusion and loss of accuracy. Previous efforts to improve the accuracy of AIM focused on using high-order schemes to reconstruct the interfacial fluxes; those schemes introduced additional numerical nonlinearities to the system of equations or compromised the accuracy of the Jacobian by neglecting the high-order terms in its construction. In this work, we describe a high-resolution compact-stencil (HRCS) AIM. The new scheme is applied to compositional reservoir simulation. In addition to the mixed implicit/explicit time discretization of standard AIM, the HRCS AIM scheme uses a mixed time and space discretization. Specifically, we blend low- and high-order fluxes according to a well defined rule that uses a high-order reconstruction in the explicit regions of the domain and a low-order reconstruction in the implicit regions. This strategy ensures that additional nonlinearities introduced by the high-order reconstruction do not impact the Jacobian matrix, thus preserving the algebraic structure of standard AIM. The HRCS AIM method is demonstrated using several compositional problems. The results indicate substantial gains in accuracy with a small additional computational cost compared with standard AIM. Additionally, HRCS AIM is more robust and has a smaller computational cost compared with its full high-resolution counterpart.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Physics","volume":"521 ","pages":"Article 113558"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999124008064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The adaptive implicit method (AIM) is the mainstream approach for compositional reservoir simulation. In its standard form, AIM uses single-point upwinding to reconstruct the fluxes across the interfaces of the control volume, and this leads to substantial numerical diffusion and loss of accuracy. Previous efforts to improve the accuracy of AIM focused on using high-order schemes to reconstruct the interfacial fluxes; those schemes introduced additional numerical nonlinearities to the system of equations or compromised the accuracy of the Jacobian by neglecting the high-order terms in its construction. In this work, we describe a high-resolution compact-stencil (HRCS) AIM. The new scheme is applied to compositional reservoir simulation. In addition to the mixed implicit/explicit time discretization of standard AIM, the HRCS AIM scheme uses a mixed time and space discretization. Specifically, we blend low- and high-order fluxes according to a well defined rule that uses a high-order reconstruction in the explicit regions of the domain and a low-order reconstruction in the implicit regions. This strategy ensures that additional nonlinearities introduced by the high-order reconstruction do not impact the Jacobian matrix, thus preserving the algebraic structure of standard AIM. The HRCS AIM method is demonstrated using several compositional problems. The results indicate substantial gains in accuracy with a small additional computational cost compared with standard AIM. Additionally, HRCS AIM is more robust and has a smaller computational cost compared with its full high-resolution counterpart.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Computational Physics thoroughly treats the computational aspects of physical problems, presenting techniques for the numerical solution of mathematical equations arising in all areas of physics. The journal seeks to emphasize methods that cross disciplinary boundaries.
The Journal of Computational Physics also publishes short notes of 4 pages or less (including figures, tables, and references but excluding title pages). Letters to the Editor commenting on articles already published in this Journal will also be considered. Neither notes nor letters should have an abstract.