Exploring fundamentals of immersive environment setups on food sensory perception in space contexts

Alicia Tran , Julia Low , Lisa Duizer
{"title":"Exploring fundamentals of immersive environment setups on food sensory perception in space contexts","authors":"Alicia Tran ,&nbsp;Julia Low ,&nbsp;Lisa Duizer","doi":"10.1016/j.sctalk.2024.100403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research suggests that space travel alters sensory perception, however, it is not yet clear what individual factors affect this perception. Taylor et al. (2020) emphasised the importance of tailoring strategies to enhance palatability and intake based on individual differences. This study aims to evaluate how an immersive space-like environment, created using screens, influences food odour perception and emotional responses. Specifically, it explores the setup of immersive screen studies to assess sensory perception and affective responses over time, considering factors such as lighting conditions in dark versus bright rooms. 29 participants were involved in a crossover design experiment in which they watched a 20-min video of a rocket launch, accompanied by environmental sounds at 70 dB, following NASA's International Space Station noise constraints. The participants were randomly assigned to evaluate the video in either a dark or bright room. The rocket launch video was chosen for its emotional impact, as it can induce awe and self-transcendent experiences, like the “Overview Effect” experienced by astronauts. Participants assessed the intensity of three food odours (vanilla, citrus, and almond) at four time points: just after takeoff, and at 5, 10, and 15 min. Measurements included liking (9-point hedonic scale), intensity (Labeled Magnitude Scale), and emotional responses (using 39 terms from the EsSense Profile). Results showed that for vanilla and almond, odour liking remained consistent over time, regardless of lighting conditions. However, for citrus, liking increased over time in the dark room. An inverse relationship between positive and negative emotions throughout the immersion period was observed, highlighting the importance of time in evoking emotional responses. Emotions during testing with the immersive screens were generally positive, such as feelings of ‘calm’, suggesting that the methodology may not be entirely suitable for simulating the more cluttered and isolated environment of a space shuttle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101148,"journal":{"name":"Science Talks","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Talks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772569324001117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that space travel alters sensory perception, however, it is not yet clear what individual factors affect this perception. Taylor et al. (2020) emphasised the importance of tailoring strategies to enhance palatability and intake based on individual differences. This study aims to evaluate how an immersive space-like environment, created using screens, influences food odour perception and emotional responses. Specifically, it explores the setup of immersive screen studies to assess sensory perception and affective responses over time, considering factors such as lighting conditions in dark versus bright rooms. 29 participants were involved in a crossover design experiment in which they watched a 20-min video of a rocket launch, accompanied by environmental sounds at 70 dB, following NASA's International Space Station noise constraints. The participants were randomly assigned to evaluate the video in either a dark or bright room. The rocket launch video was chosen for its emotional impact, as it can induce awe and self-transcendent experiences, like the “Overview Effect” experienced by astronauts. Participants assessed the intensity of three food odours (vanilla, citrus, and almond) at four time points: just after takeoff, and at 5, 10, and 15 min. Measurements included liking (9-point hedonic scale), intensity (Labeled Magnitude Scale), and emotional responses (using 39 terms from the EsSense Profile). Results showed that for vanilla and almond, odour liking remained consistent over time, regardless of lighting conditions. However, for citrus, liking increased over time in the dark room. An inverse relationship between positive and negative emotions throughout the immersion period was observed, highlighting the importance of time in evoking emotional responses. Emotions during testing with the immersive screens were generally positive, such as feelings of ‘calm’, suggesting that the methodology may not be entirely suitable for simulating the more cluttered and isolated environment of a space shuttle.
探索沉浸式环境设置对空间环境中食物感知的基本影响
研究表明,太空旅行会改变感官知觉,但目前尚不清楚哪些个体因素会影响这种知觉。泰勒等人(2020 年)强调了根据个体差异制定策略以提高适口性和摄入量的重要性。本研究旨在评估使用屏幕创建的沉浸式空间环境如何影响食物气味感知和情绪反应。具体来说,它探讨了沉浸式屏幕研究的设置,以评估随时间变化的感官知觉和情绪反应,同时考虑到黑暗房间与明亮房间的照明条件等因素。29 名参与者参与了一项交叉设计实验,在该实验中,他们观看了 20 分钟的火箭发射视频,伴随着 70 分贝的环境声音,符合美国国家航空航天局国际空间站的噪音限制。实验参与者被随机分配在黑暗或明亮的房间内对视频进行评估。之所以选择火箭发射视频,是因为它具有情感冲击力,能够引起敬畏和自我超越的体验,就像宇航员经历的 "概览效应 "一样。受试者在四个时间点对三种食物气味(香草、柑橘和杏仁)的强度进行了评估:起飞后、5 分钟、10 分钟和 15 分钟。测量包括喜欢程度(9 点享乐量表)、强度(标签量表)和情绪反应(使用 EsSense Profile 中的 39 个术语)。结果表明,对于香草和杏仁,无论光照条件如何,气味的喜爱程度在一段时间内保持一致。然而,在暗室中,对柑橘气味的好感度会随着时间的推移而增加。在整个沉浸期间,积极情绪和消极情绪之间呈反比关系,突出了时间在唤起情绪反应方面的重要性。在使用沉浸式屏幕进行测试期间,情绪一般都是积极的,例如 "平静 "的感觉,这表明该方法可能并不完全适合模拟航天飞机中更加杂乱和孤立的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信