Ran Duan , Yingying Zhang , Yanxin Cheng , Lei Zhang , Senming Zhao
{"title":"Lidocaine nebulization for airway topical anesthesia can be improved by diminish ex-cannula lost and alkalization","authors":"Ran Duan , Yingying Zhang , Yanxin Cheng , Lei Zhang , Senming Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lidocaine nebulization is noninvasive, safe, and easy to perform. However, it does not provide adequate anesthesia due to the following reasons: 1. There is a high wastage of lidocaine aerosol, with at least 70 % of the lidocaine aerosol being lost from the cannula. This loss of lidocaine results in a lower amount of inhaled lidocaine, which is insufficient to provide adequate anesthesia. 2. The commercial lidocaine preparation has a low penetrating potency. The onset of anesthesia is directly related to the amount of local anesthetic in the lipid-soluble form. However, there are only a few lipid-soluble prototypes in the commercially available lidocaine cartridges. This is because the lidocaine is purposely formulated as acidic solutions (with pH levels between 3.5 and 5.5) in order to enhance the solubility and stability of the anesthetic salts. To address these issues and improve lidocaine anesthesia potency while reducing wastage, a “Y” type cannula was used for aerosol inhalation. Additionally, 1/5 vol of 5 % sodium bicarbonate solution was added to 2 % lidocaine to enhance the pH value to 7.2. This alkalized lidocaine nebulization provides an effective topical anesthesia for bronchoscopy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 111511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724002548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lidocaine nebulization is noninvasive, safe, and easy to perform. However, it does not provide adequate anesthesia due to the following reasons: 1. There is a high wastage of lidocaine aerosol, with at least 70 % of the lidocaine aerosol being lost from the cannula. This loss of lidocaine results in a lower amount of inhaled lidocaine, which is insufficient to provide adequate anesthesia. 2. The commercial lidocaine preparation has a low penetrating potency. The onset of anesthesia is directly related to the amount of local anesthetic in the lipid-soluble form. However, there are only a few lipid-soluble prototypes in the commercially available lidocaine cartridges. This is because the lidocaine is purposely formulated as acidic solutions (with pH levels between 3.5 and 5.5) in order to enhance the solubility and stability of the anesthetic salts. To address these issues and improve lidocaine anesthesia potency while reducing wastage, a “Y” type cannula was used for aerosol inhalation. Additionally, 1/5 vol of 5 % sodium bicarbonate solution was added to 2 % lidocaine to enhance the pH value to 7.2. This alkalized lidocaine nebulization provides an effective topical anesthesia for bronchoscopy.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.