B Bhagavath , H Huddleston , MH Emanuel , AB Hooker , CA Salazar , C Martin , D Sobti , J Kumar , MG Munro
{"title":"Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Following Intrauterine Adhesiolysis - A Systematic Review","authors":"B Bhagavath , H Huddleston , MH Emanuel , AB Hooker , CA Salazar , C Martin , D Sobti , J Kumar , MG Munro","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>Adverse pregnancy outcomes following intrauterine lysis of adhesions have been reported. The objective was to perform a meta-analysis of published research to quantify the risk.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>International, multi-institutional collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>Using search terms including intrauterine adhesions, surgery, and clinical outcomes, Cochrane, Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched without any date limits. Very few randomized controlled trials were found pertaining to this assessment and hence meta-analysis could not be performed. Therefore, observational studies were included to perform a systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>2214 abstracts were identified and 418 assessed for eligibility. 235 studies were found to be eligible and 18 were eventually included in the analysis. Preterm delivery rate was 17%. Placental abnormalities included 11% placenta acreta spectrum disorders and 3% previa. Antepartum hemorrhage occurred in 3% and Peripartum hemorrhage in 10%. Hysterectomy was performed in 4%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Hysteroscopic lysis was adhesions is associated with adverse events during subsequent pregnancies. High quality studies are needed to better assess the impact of intrauterine adhesiolysis on pregnancy outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"31 11","pages":"Pages S20-S21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024005016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study Objective
Adverse pregnancy outcomes following intrauterine lysis of adhesions have been reported. The objective was to perform a meta-analysis of published research to quantify the risk.
Design
Systematic review.
Setting
International, multi-institutional collaboration.
Patients or Participants
Using search terms including intrauterine adhesions, surgery, and clinical outcomes, Cochrane, Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched without any date limits. Very few randomized controlled trials were found pertaining to this assessment and hence meta-analysis could not be performed. Therefore, observational studies were included to perform a systematic review.
Interventions
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
Measurements and Main Results
2214 abstracts were identified and 418 assessed for eligibility. 235 studies were found to be eligible and 18 were eventually included in the analysis. Preterm delivery rate was 17%. Placental abnormalities included 11% placenta acreta spectrum disorders and 3% previa. Antepartum hemorrhage occurred in 3% and Peripartum hemorrhage in 10%. Hysterectomy was performed in 4%.
Conclusion
Hysteroscopic lysis was adhesions is associated with adverse events during subsequent pregnancies. High quality studies are needed to better assess the impact of intrauterine adhesiolysis on pregnancy outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.