Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Tairan Zhou , Hao Hu , Jiaxin Hu , Ziye Yang , Qilin Lv , Yajun Wang , Binwei Yan , Xueqin Ren , Shuwen Hu
{"title":"Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems","authors":"Tairan Zhou ,&nbsp;Hao Hu ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Hu ,&nbsp;Ziye Yang ,&nbsp;Qilin Lv ,&nbsp;Yajun Wang ,&nbsp;Binwei Yan ,&nbsp;Xueqin Ren ,&nbsp;Shuwen Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reclamation of saline-sodic soils can unlock vast potential resources, relieve food shortages, and increase valuable ecosystem services. While previous investigations have focused on the current ecosystem service (ES) value of reclaimed paddy fields, the potential long-term costs and benefits of reclamation are still largely unknown. To fill this important research gap, we assessed ES values of reclaimed paddies at the field scale, using primary data collected from 15 different paddy management systems. We assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios (BCR) of three different reclamation models and two coculture models across a chronosequence of paddy sites (cultivated for up to 50 years). Our results demonstrate that the addition of cellulose sulfonated modified composite (CSMC) and flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) substantially increased the net ecosystem service value (NESV) by 16.53 % and 52.21 %, respectively, compared to control paddy cultivation sites. Additionally, integrated rice-crab and rice-fish coculture systems presented great increases in market value (48.48 % and 51.39 %, respectively) compared with that of monoculture systems. Ecosystem provisioning and gas regulating services increased alongside market benefits over longer cultivation periods, indicating potential advantages of long-term paddy cultivation. After 50 years of operation, the cumulative benefit of the CSMC system was approximately 455058.88 ¥ ha<sup>−1</sup>, which was approximately 1.6 times greater than the control. These results indicate that additional investment in the CSMC system can produce a high margin benefit-cost ratio (MBCR). Given appropriate management models and policies, CSMC inputs and rice-fish co-culture represent the best-performing reclamation system in this study. Our study lays the foundation for associated studies on related government policy, corporate investments, and agricultural production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101682"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reclamation of saline-sodic soils can unlock vast potential resources, relieve food shortages, and increase valuable ecosystem services. While previous investigations have focused on the current ecosystem service (ES) value of reclaimed paddy fields, the potential long-term costs and benefits of reclamation are still largely unknown. To fill this important research gap, we assessed ES values of reclaimed paddies at the field scale, using primary data collected from 15 different paddy management systems. We assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios (BCR) of three different reclamation models and two coculture models across a chronosequence of paddy sites (cultivated for up to 50 years). Our results demonstrate that the addition of cellulose sulfonated modified composite (CSMC) and flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) substantially increased the net ecosystem service value (NESV) by 16.53 % and 52.21 %, respectively, compared to control paddy cultivation sites. Additionally, integrated rice-crab and rice-fish coculture systems presented great increases in market value (48.48 % and 51.39 %, respectively) compared with that of monoculture systems. Ecosystem provisioning and gas regulating services increased alongside market benefits over longer cultivation periods, indicating potential advantages of long-term paddy cultivation. After 50 years of operation, the cumulative benefit of the CSMC system was approximately 455058.88 ¥ ha−1, which was approximately 1.6 times greater than the control. These results indicate that additional investment in the CSMC system can produce a high margin benefit-cost ratio (MBCR). Given appropriate management models and policies, CSMC inputs and rice-fish co-culture represent the best-performing reclamation system in this study. Our study lays the foundation for associated studies on related government policy, corporate investments, and agricultural production.

Abstract Image

在不同水田系统下开垦盐碱地的生态系统服务和成本效益
对盐碱地进行开垦可以释放巨大的潜在资源,缓解粮食短缺问题,并增加宝贵的生态系统服务。以往的调查主要集中在垦造水田的当前生态系统服务(ES)价值上,而垦造水田的潜在长期成本和效益在很大程度上仍不为人所知。为了填补这一重要的研究空白,我们利用从 15 个不同的水稻管理系统收集到的原始数据,评估了垦造水田在田间尺度上的生态系统服务价值。我们评估了三种不同开垦模式和两种共作模式的市场和非市场效益、成本以及效益成本比(BCR)。结果表明,与对照稻田相比,添加纤维素磺化改性复合材料(CSMC)和烟气脱硫石膏(FGDG)可大幅提高生态系统服务净值(NESV),增幅分别为 16.53% 和 52.21%。此外,与单一养殖系统相比,稻蟹和稻鱼综合养殖系统的市场价值也大幅增加(分别为 48.48 % 和 51.39 %)。在较长的种植期中,生态系统供应和气体调节服务与市场效益同时增加,这表明了长期稻田种植的潜在优势。经过 50 年的经营,CSMC 系统的累积效益约为 455058.88 ¥ ha-1,是对照组的约 1.6 倍。这些结果表明,对 CSMC 系统的额外投资可产生较高的边际效益成本比(MBCR)。在适当的管理模式和政策下,CSMC 投入和稻鱼共养是本研究中表现最佳的填海系统。我们的研究为相关的政府政策、企业投资和农业生产研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem Services ECOLOGYENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly. Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信