Is There More Than Meets the Eye? Pattern of Visible and Occult Peritoneal Endometriosis in Patients with Pelvic Pain

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
G Namazi , N Chauhan , S Knapp , M Stuparich , J Cruz , S Nahas , S Behbehani
{"title":"Is There More Than Meets the Eye? Pattern of Visible and Occult Peritoneal Endometriosis in Patients with Pelvic Pain","authors":"G Namazi ,&nbsp;N Chauhan ,&nbsp;S Knapp ,&nbsp;M Stuparich ,&nbsp;J Cruz ,&nbsp;S Nahas ,&nbsp;S Behbehani","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>Pattern of visible and occult peritoneal endometriosis in patients with pelvic pain undergoing complete peritonectomy(CP).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Academic medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>Patients with chronic pelvic pain undergoing a laparoscopic or robotic CP between 2018-2024. Patients with stage four endometriosis were excluded. A pilot analysis of 56 patients are included in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Minimally invasive CP with documentation of intraoperative location of endometriosis performed by fellowship-trained surgeons experienced in endometriosis excision. CP was defined as excision of left and right pelvic brims, pelvic side-walls, ovarian fossae, uterosacral ligaments, posterior cul-de-sac and bladder peritoneum.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>Records were coded as 1(surgeon positive) or 0(surgeon negative) and 1(pathology positive) and 0(pathology negative). Discordance was calculated (surgeon positive-pathology negative=1; pathology negative-surgeon positive=-1). 89.3% of patients (28.7% of total regions) had at least one instance of discordance. In 61.6% of those cases, the operative report identified areas of suspected endometriosis, but the pathology showed no endometriosis. Of those cases 47.8% showed evidence of fibrosis or chronic inflammation. Hormonal medication and history of previous surgery were not related to surgeon positive/pathology negative discordance (chi-square, <em>p</em> = .07). In the other 38.4% of discordant cases, the operative report did NOT identify areas of suspected endometriosis, but the pathology report DID identify endometriosis. The area with the most identified endometriosis was the left ovarian fossa (80% positive pathology).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Evidence for surgical excision of endometriosis for improving pain is robust. Debate regarding the optimal technique continues. Our findings further support the emerging data suggesting the role of CP given that even with expert, well-trained eyes, microscopic endometriosis can be missed. Furthermore, presence of fibrosis or chronic inflammation in nearly half of the cases where the pathology report did not show endometriosis is an intriguing finding. Studies are needed to assess the role of CP in reducing the risk of repeated surgical interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"31 11","pages":"Page S5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024004837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective

Pattern of visible and occult peritoneal endometriosis in patients with pelvic pain undergoing complete peritonectomy(CP).

Design

Retrospective observational.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Patients or Participants

Patients with chronic pelvic pain undergoing a laparoscopic or robotic CP between 2018-2024. Patients with stage four endometriosis were excluded. A pilot analysis of 56 patients are included in this study.

Interventions

Minimally invasive CP with documentation of intraoperative location of endometriosis performed by fellowship-trained surgeons experienced in endometriosis excision. CP was defined as excision of left and right pelvic brims, pelvic side-walls, ovarian fossae, uterosacral ligaments, posterior cul-de-sac and bladder peritoneum.

Measurements and Main Results

Records were coded as 1(surgeon positive) or 0(surgeon negative) and 1(pathology positive) and 0(pathology negative). Discordance was calculated (surgeon positive-pathology negative=1; pathology negative-surgeon positive=-1). 89.3% of patients (28.7% of total regions) had at least one instance of discordance. In 61.6% of those cases, the operative report identified areas of suspected endometriosis, but the pathology showed no endometriosis. Of those cases 47.8% showed evidence of fibrosis or chronic inflammation. Hormonal medication and history of previous surgery were not related to surgeon positive/pathology negative discordance (chi-square, p = .07). In the other 38.4% of discordant cases, the operative report did NOT identify areas of suspected endometriosis, but the pathology report DID identify endometriosis. The area with the most identified endometriosis was the left ovarian fossa (80% positive pathology).

Conclusion

Evidence for surgical excision of endometriosis for improving pain is robust. Debate regarding the optimal technique continues. Our findings further support the emerging data suggesting the role of CP given that even with expert, well-trained eyes, microscopic endometriosis can be missed. Furthermore, presence of fibrosis or chronic inflammation in nearly half of the cases where the pathology report did not show endometriosis is an intriguing finding. Studies are needed to assess the role of CP in reducing the risk of repeated surgical interventions.
子宫内膜异位症远不止这些?盆腔疼痛患者可见和隐匿性腹膜子宫内膜异位症的模式
研究目的接受全腹膜切除术(CP)的盆腔疼痛患者中可见和隐匿性腹膜子宫内膜异位症的模式.设计回顾性观察.设置学术医疗中心.患者或参与者2018-2024年间接受腹腔镜或机器人CP的慢性盆腔疼痛患者。不包括子宫内膜异位症四期患者。本研究纳入了对 56 名患者的试点分析。干预措施由受过研究培训、在子宫内膜异位症切除方面经验丰富的外科医生实施微创 CP,并记录术中子宫内膜异位症的位置。微创子宫内膜异位症的定义是切除左右盆腔边缘、盆腔侧壁、卵巢窝、子宫骶骨韧带、后穹窿和膀胱腹膜。计算不一致性(外科医生阳性-病理阴性=1;病理阴性-外科医生阳性=-1)。89.3%的患者(占总区域的28.7%)至少有一次不一致。在 61.6% 的病例中,手术报告确定了疑似子宫内膜异位症的区域,但病理结果显示没有子宫内膜异位症。在这些病例中,47.8%有纤维化或慢性炎症的迹象。荷尔蒙药物和既往手术史与外科医生阳性/病理阴性不一致无关(卡方,P = 0.07)。在其他 38.4% 的不一致病例中,手术报告没有发现疑似子宫内膜异位症的区域,但病理报告确实发现了子宫内膜异位症。结论 手术切除子宫内膜异位症以改善疼痛的证据确凿。关于最佳技术的争论仍在继续。我们的研究结果进一步支持了新出现的数据,这些数据表明了 CP 的作用,因为即使是训练有素的专家,也可能会漏诊显微镜下的子宫内膜异位症。此外,在病理报告未显示子宫内膜异位症的病例中,有近一半存在纤维化或慢性炎症,这也是一个耐人寻味的发现。需要进行研究,以评估 CP 在降低重复手术干预风险方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信