Performance of artificial neural network compared to multi-linear regression in prediction of countermovement jump height

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Amirhossein Emamian , Alireza Hashemi Oskouei , Kristof Kipp , Rasoul Azreh
{"title":"Performance of artificial neural network compared to multi-linear regression in prediction of countermovement jump height","authors":"Amirhossein Emamian ,&nbsp;Alireza Hashemi Oskouei ,&nbsp;Kristof Kipp ,&nbsp;Rasoul Azreh","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has used primarily linear regression models to predict jump height and establish contributors of performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of artificial neural network (ANN) and multi-linear regression (MLR) in prediction of countermovement jump (CMJ) height and investigating the contribution of kinematic variables to CMJ performance. Thirty-four healthy young male athletes performed a total of 204 CMJ while eight kinematic variables (the hip, knee, and ankle angles at the begging of the concentric phase of CMJ, the hip and knee take-off angles, and the shoulder, hip, and knee maximum angular velocities) were used as inputs to ANN and MLR to predict CMJ height. The correlation coefficients between the jump height and the predicted value by the developed models indicated that ANN predict CMJ height better than MLR (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.68 compared to <em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.44). Moreover, the root mean squared error of prediction showed better performance of the ANN rather than the MLR (4.8 cm compared to 5.3 cm). The shoulder and hip maximum angular velocities were the most important contributors, and then the hip and knee take-off angles contributed to CMJ height. In conclusion, implementing ANN to identify key variables of performance may also be relevant for other sport skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 2211-2217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has used primarily linear regression models to predict jump height and establish contributors of performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of artificial neural network (ANN) and multi-linear regression (MLR) in prediction of countermovement jump (CMJ) height and investigating the contribution of kinematic variables to CMJ performance. Thirty-four healthy young male athletes performed a total of 204 CMJ while eight kinematic variables (the hip, knee, and ankle angles at the begging of the concentric phase of CMJ, the hip and knee take-off angles, and the shoulder, hip, and knee maximum angular velocities) were used as inputs to ANN and MLR to predict CMJ height. The correlation coefficients between the jump height and the predicted value by the developed models indicated that ANN predict CMJ height better than MLR (R2 = 0.68 compared to R2 = 0.44). Moreover, the root mean squared error of prediction showed better performance of the ANN rather than the MLR (4.8 cm compared to 5.3 cm). The shoulder and hip maximum angular velocities were the most important contributors, and then the hip and knee take-off angles contributed to CMJ height. In conclusion, implementing ANN to identify key variables of performance may also be relevant for other sport skills.
人工神经网络与多线性回归在预测反向运动跳跃高度中的性能比较
以往的研究主要使用线性回归模型来预测跳跃高度并确定成绩的贡献因素。本研究的目的是比较人工神经网络(ANN)和多线性回归(MLR)在预测反向运动跳跃(CMJ)高度方面的性能,并调查运动学变量对 CMJ 成绩的贡献。34名健康的年轻男性运动员共进行了204次CMJ,8个运动学变量(CMJ同心阶段开始时的髋、膝和踝关节角度,髋和膝的起跳角度,肩、髋和膝的最大角速度)被用作ANN和MLR预测CMJ高度的输入。跳高高度与所开发模型预测值之间的相关系数表明,ANN 预测 CMJ 高度的效果优于 MLR(R2 = 0.68,而 MLR 的 R2 = 0.44)。此外,从预测的均方根误差来看,ANN 比 MLR 的性能更好(4.8 厘米比 5.3 厘米)。肩部和髋部的最大角速度对 CMJ 高度的贡献最大,然后是髋部和膝部的腾空角。总之,利用方差网络确定成绩的关键变量可能也适用于其他运动技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信