Richard A. Inman , Sara Ribeiro de Faria , Susana Pedras , Paulo A.S. Moreira
{"title":"Engagement and disengagement with sustainable development: Internal dynamics and relation to basic psychological needs","authors":"Richard A. Inman , Sara Ribeiro de Faria , Susana Pedras , Paulo A.S. Moreira","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating concepts from self-determination theory, the objective of this multi-study paper, drawing on data from a large longitudinal study, was to construct a richer understanding of the internal dynamics and antecedents of engagement and disengagement with sustainable development (ESD and DSD) in adolescents (8th – 9th graders). First, we tested the dynamics between the emotional, cognitive and behavioral indicators that occur within ESD and DSD. Second, we tested how adolescents' self-perceptions of basic need satisfaction and frustration supported or undermined <span>ESD</span> and <span>DSD</span>. In Study 1 (two-wave design; <em>n</em> = 1076), we identified distinct internal dynamics for ESD and DSD, and showed that satisfaction of relatedness at school in 8th grade predicted increased emotional and cognitive ESD in 9th grade. In Study 2 (cross-sectional design; <em>n</em> = 1650), a multivariate multiple regression analysis showed that ESD was positively associated with perceived satisfaction of basic needs in general, but most strongly the satisfaction of autonomy. Results also indicated that the frustration of competence may be important to understanding why people experience disengagement with sustainability issues. One implication of the findings is that education policies and practices aiming to promote adolescents’ perceived sense of relatedness at school may be helpful for preparing students to effectively address the challenges associated with sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102469"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424002421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Integrating concepts from self-determination theory, the objective of this multi-study paper, drawing on data from a large longitudinal study, was to construct a richer understanding of the internal dynamics and antecedents of engagement and disengagement with sustainable development (ESD and DSD) in adolescents (8th – 9th graders). First, we tested the dynamics between the emotional, cognitive and behavioral indicators that occur within ESD and DSD. Second, we tested how adolescents' self-perceptions of basic need satisfaction and frustration supported or undermined ESD and DSD. In Study 1 (two-wave design; n = 1076), we identified distinct internal dynamics for ESD and DSD, and showed that satisfaction of relatedness at school in 8th grade predicted increased emotional and cognitive ESD in 9th grade. In Study 2 (cross-sectional design; n = 1650), a multivariate multiple regression analysis showed that ESD was positively associated with perceived satisfaction of basic needs in general, but most strongly the satisfaction of autonomy. Results also indicated that the frustration of competence may be important to understanding why people experience disengagement with sustainability issues. One implication of the findings is that education policies and practices aiming to promote adolescents’ perceived sense of relatedness at school may be helpful for preparing students to effectively address the challenges associated with sustainable development.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space