Kevin P. Davies , John Duncan , Renata Varea , Diana Ralulu , Solomoni Nagaunavou , Nathan Wales , Eleanor Bruce , Bryan Boruff
{"title":"An intercomparison of national and global land use and land cover products for Fiji","authors":"Kevin P. Davies , John Duncan , Renata Varea , Diana Ralulu , Solomoni Nagaunavou , Nathan Wales , Eleanor Bruce , Bryan Boruff","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2024.104260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Here, a methodology to generate national-scale annual 10 m spatial resolution land use and land cover maps for Fiji (Fiji LULC) is presented. A training dataset of 13,419 points with a LULC label across three years from 2019 to 2021 was generated alongside a nationally representative test dataset of 834 points. These data were used to train a random forests model to convert an image stack of pre-processed Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data and topographic spatial layers into an annual categorical LULC map. When evaluated against the test dataset, the model has an overall accuracy of 83 % (SE: 2.1 %).</div><div>The Fiji LULC map was compared to three global 10 m spatial resolution land cover products: Google’s Dynamic World, ESRI LULC, and ESA’s WorldCover v200. These maps were compared statistically using the independent test dataset and in several case study applications (e.g. agricultural monitoring and disaster impacts mapping). The Fiji LULC had a higher overall accuracy than the three global LULC products and aligned more closely with a high-quality field survey of over 2500 rice fields (i.e. Fiji LULC classified 88 % of the rice fields as agricultural compared to 60.6–15.7 % in the global LULC products). A comparison of the overlap between the agricultural class of the four LULC maps with a flood mask following Tropical Cyclone Yasa indicated that dataset choice has a substantial impact on estimates of the area of flooded croplands. The Fiji LULC map tends to capture agricultural land covers and smaller scale landscape features with more accuracy than the global products. This analysis illustrates the importance of assessing the performance of global LULC products in particular locations and for specific applications. As demonstrated here, the choice of LULC product could impact subsequent analysis and monitoring tasks. To support these LULC product comparisons, an open-source Python package for computing performance metrics for LULC maps when reference data have different strata to map classes has been published. Further, the training data, test data, and national-scale maps for Fiji have been produced for 2019 to 2022 and are available as open source products on the Pacific Data Hub.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104260"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843224006162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Here, a methodology to generate national-scale annual 10 m spatial resolution land use and land cover maps for Fiji (Fiji LULC) is presented. A training dataset of 13,419 points with a LULC label across three years from 2019 to 2021 was generated alongside a nationally representative test dataset of 834 points. These data were used to train a random forests model to convert an image stack of pre-processed Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data and topographic spatial layers into an annual categorical LULC map. When evaluated against the test dataset, the model has an overall accuracy of 83 % (SE: 2.1 %).
The Fiji LULC map was compared to three global 10 m spatial resolution land cover products: Google’s Dynamic World, ESRI LULC, and ESA’s WorldCover v200. These maps were compared statistically using the independent test dataset and in several case study applications (e.g. agricultural monitoring and disaster impacts mapping). The Fiji LULC had a higher overall accuracy than the three global LULC products and aligned more closely with a high-quality field survey of over 2500 rice fields (i.e. Fiji LULC classified 88 % of the rice fields as agricultural compared to 60.6–15.7 % in the global LULC products). A comparison of the overlap between the agricultural class of the four LULC maps with a flood mask following Tropical Cyclone Yasa indicated that dataset choice has a substantial impact on estimates of the area of flooded croplands. The Fiji LULC map tends to capture agricultural land covers and smaller scale landscape features with more accuracy than the global products. This analysis illustrates the importance of assessing the performance of global LULC products in particular locations and for specific applications. As demonstrated here, the choice of LULC product could impact subsequent analysis and monitoring tasks. To support these LULC product comparisons, an open-source Python package for computing performance metrics for LULC maps when reference data have different strata to map classes has been published. Further, the training data, test data, and national-scale maps for Fiji have been produced for 2019 to 2022 and are available as open source products on the Pacific Data Hub.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.