Bortezomib-based regimen affects cognitive functions in multiple myeloma patients through the VEGF pathway – Hypothesis that connects different knowledge streams
Marija Stanić Damić , Toni Valković , Duška Petranović , Andrej Belančić , Zinaida Perić
{"title":"Bortezomib-based regimen affects cognitive functions in multiple myeloma patients through the VEGF pathway – Hypothesis that connects different knowledge streams","authors":"Marija Stanić Damić , Toni Valković , Duška Petranović , Andrej Belančić , Zinaida Perić","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiple myeloma is a chronic hematological malignancy that usually affects older adults. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in multiple myeloma patients significantly impacts the everyday quality of life, however its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Bortezomib is a commonly used drug in the treatment of multiple myeloma that does not pass the blood–brain barrier. Nevertheless, it can still affect central nervous system (CNS) through yet unknown mechanisms. This article discusses the potential effect of bortezomib-based treatment on cognitive functions in multiple myeloma patients. We hypothesize that bortezomib impairs cognition by decreasing the levels of a neuroprotective cytokine – vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The generation of hypotheses about the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment paves the way for future basic and clinical studies to improve multiple myeloma management. VEGF could serve as a biomarker of cognitive dysfunction while systematic evaluation of cognition could enable early detection of cognitive impairment. Timely recognition of cognitive impairment might be crucial when selecting the most appropriate<!--> <!-->treatment. Furthermore, this could allow the implementation of preventive measures against further deterioration in cognitive function and quality of life for patients with multiple myeloma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 111510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724002536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a chronic hematological malignancy that usually affects older adults. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in multiple myeloma patients significantly impacts the everyday quality of life, however its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Bortezomib is a commonly used drug in the treatment of multiple myeloma that does not pass the blood–brain barrier. Nevertheless, it can still affect central nervous system (CNS) through yet unknown mechanisms. This article discusses the potential effect of bortezomib-based treatment on cognitive functions in multiple myeloma patients. We hypothesize that bortezomib impairs cognition by decreasing the levels of a neuroprotective cytokine – vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The generation of hypotheses about the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment paves the way for future basic and clinical studies to improve multiple myeloma management. VEGF could serve as a biomarker of cognitive dysfunction while systematic evaluation of cognition could enable early detection of cognitive impairment. Timely recognition of cognitive impairment might be crucial when selecting the most appropriate treatment. Furthermore, this could allow the implementation of preventive measures against further deterioration in cognitive function and quality of life for patients with multiple myeloma.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.