{"title":"Predictors of Physician Agreement With Radiologist-Recommended Follow-up Imaging","authors":"Moses Flash MD , Elyse A. Lynch MPH , Ronilda Lacson MD, PhD , Jeffrey P. Guenette MD, MPH , Sonali Desai MD, MPH , Neena Kapoor MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Although recommendations for additional imaging are common in radiology reports, completion of follow-up imaging does not always occur, which could reflect disagreement between radiologist and referring provider. We assessed how frequently referring providers agree with radiologists’ follow-up recommendations, reasons for disagreement, and factors associated with radiologist-referring provider agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This institutional review board-exempt, retrospective study was performed at a large academic center. A PACS-integrated tool allowed radiologists to send follow-up imaging recommendations to referring providers, who used the tool to document agreement or disagreement with recommendations. The study included recommendations sent for outpatients between October 21, 2019, and October 31, 2022. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify patient, radiologist, and imaging examination factors associated with radiologist-referring provider agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 9,406 recommendations meeting inclusion criteria, 8,331 (88.6%) resulted in agreement. The most common reason for disagreement was that the recommendation was considered not clinically relevant (44.5%, 478 of 1,075). The following factors were associated with low rates of agreement: referring provider being a surgeon (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, <em>P</em> < .001) or recommendation for follow-up nuclear imaging (OR 0.64, <em>P</em> = .012). The odds of agreement were higher for recommendations made by thoracic radiologists (OR 1.41, <em>P</em> = .002) and for recommendations with longer follow-up time frames (weeks) (OR 1.03, <em>P</em> < .001). Patient race, ethnicity, insurance type, and living in a socio-economically disadvantaged neighborhood were not significantly associated with radiologist-referring provider agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Referring providers frequently agree with follow-up imaging recommendations made by radiologists for outpatients, and patient demographics and socio-economic factors do not seem to significantly impact radiologist-referring provider agreement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 4","pages":"Pages 407-416"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024009165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Although recommendations for additional imaging are common in radiology reports, completion of follow-up imaging does not always occur, which could reflect disagreement between radiologist and referring provider. We assessed how frequently referring providers agree with radiologists’ follow-up recommendations, reasons for disagreement, and factors associated with radiologist-referring provider agreement.
Methods
This institutional review board-exempt, retrospective study was performed at a large academic center. A PACS-integrated tool allowed radiologists to send follow-up imaging recommendations to referring providers, who used the tool to document agreement or disagreement with recommendations. The study included recommendations sent for outpatients between October 21, 2019, and October 31, 2022. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify patient, radiologist, and imaging examination factors associated with radiologist-referring provider agreement.
Results
Of the 9,406 recommendations meeting inclusion criteria, 8,331 (88.6%) resulted in agreement. The most common reason for disagreement was that the recommendation was considered not clinically relevant (44.5%, 478 of 1,075). The following factors were associated with low rates of agreement: referring provider being a surgeon (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, P < .001) or recommendation for follow-up nuclear imaging (OR 0.64, P = .012). The odds of agreement were higher for recommendations made by thoracic radiologists (OR 1.41, P = .002) and for recommendations with longer follow-up time frames (weeks) (OR 1.03, P < .001). Patient race, ethnicity, insurance type, and living in a socio-economically disadvantaged neighborhood were not significantly associated with radiologist-referring provider agreement.
Discussion
Referring providers frequently agree with follow-up imaging recommendations made by radiologists for outpatients, and patient demographics and socio-economic factors do not seem to significantly impact radiologist-referring provider agreement.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.