Evaluation of participation in a former rehabilitation population: a comparison between USER-Participation Restriction and Satisfaction subscales and PROMIS Ability to Participate and PROMIS Satisfaction with participation 8-item short forms in a cross-sectional multicentre study.

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q1 REHABILITATION

Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2425747

B M P Mourits, E W M Scholten, J A de Graaf, T I Mol, C A M van Bennekom, R J E M Smeets, M F Reneman, L D Roorda, J M A Visser-Meily, M W M Post

{"title":"Evaluation of participation in a former rehabilitation population: a comparison between USER-Participation Restriction and Satisfaction subscales and PROMIS Ability to Participate and PROMIS Satisfaction with participation 8-item short forms in a cross-sectional multicentre study.","authors":"B M P Mourits, E W M Scholten, J A de Graaf, T I Mol, C A M van Bennekom, R J E M Smeets, M F Reneman, L D Roorda, J M A Visser-Meily, M W M Post","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2425747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) can be used to quantify participation in rehabilitation patients, yet there is limited comparative research on their content and psychometric properties to make an informed decision between them.Objective: To compare the content and several psychometric properties of the Restriction and Satisfaction subscales of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation - Participation (USER-P) with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APS) and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SPS) v2.0 8-item short forms.Methods: A cross-sectional survey among patients who received rehabilitation treatment (N = 563). Coverage of participation domains, distributions, inter-item correlations, internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminative validity were compared between the PROMs.Results: The USER-P subscales cover more participation domains than the PROMIS short forms. All PROMs demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α > 0.82) and each had >75% of the hypotheses regarding construct validity confirmed.Conclusions: The internal consistency, construct and discriminative validity were similar between the USER-P subscales and the PROMIS short forms. It appeared that the USER-P offers more broad information about participation on item level and the total scores of PROMIS short forms offer more precise general information regarding participation.","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2425747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) can be used to quantify participation in rehabilitation patients, yet there is limited comparative research on their content and psychometric properties to make an informed decision between them.

Objective: To compare the content and several psychometric properties of the Restriction and Satisfaction subscales of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation - Participation (USER-P) with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APS) and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SPS) v2.0 8-item short forms.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey among patients who received rehabilitation treatment (N = 563). Coverage of participation domains, distributions, inter-item correlations, internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminative validity were compared between the PROMs.

Results: The USER-P subscales cover more participation domains than the PROMIS short forms. All PROMs demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α > 0.82) and each had >75% of the hypotheses regarding construct validity confirmed.

Conclusions: The internal consistency, construct and discriminative validity were similar between the USER-P subscales and the PROMIS short forms. It appeared that the USER-P offers more broad information about participation on item level and the total scores of PROMIS short forms offer more precise general information regarding participation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估前康复人群的参与情况：一项横断面多中心研究中 USER-参与限制和满意度子量表与 PROMIS 参与能力和 PROMIS 参与满意度 8 项短表之间的比较。

背景：有几种患者报告结果测量法（PROMs）可用于量化康复患者的参与情况，但对其内容和心理测量特性的比较研究却很有限，因此无法对它们做出明智的决定：比较乌得勒支康复评估量表（USER-P）的 "限制 "和 "满意 "分量表与患者报告结果测量信息系统参与社会角色和活动的能力（PROMIS-APS）和对社会角色和活动的满意度（PROMIS-SPS）v2.0 8项目简表的内容和心理测量学特性：对接受康复治疗的患者（563 人）进行横断面调查。比较各 PROM 的参与领域覆盖范围、分布、项目间相关性、内部一致性、建构效度和区分效度：与 PROMIS 短表相比，USER-P 分量表涵盖了更多的参与领域。所有 PROM 均显示出足够的内部一致性（α > 0.82），并且每项 PROM 均有 >75% 的构建效度假设得到证实：结论：USER-P 子量表和 PROMIS 短表的内部一致性、建构效度和区分效度相似。USER-P似乎在项目层面上提供了更广泛的参与信息，而PROMIS简表的总分则提供了更精确的一般参与信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

9.10%

发文量

415

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.