Effect of a community-based intervention for sexually transmitted infections on population-level prevalence among youth in Zimbabwe (STICH): a cluster-randomised trial.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chido Dziva Chikwari, Ethel Dauya, Victoria Simms, Katharina Kranzer, Tsitsi Bandason, Anna Machiha, Owen Mugurungi, Primrose Musiyandaka, Tinashe Mwaturura, Nkazimulo Tshuma, Sarah Bernays, Constancia Mavodza, Mandikudza Tembo, Kevin Martin, Constance R S Mackworth-Young, Joanna Busza, Suzanna C Francis, Richard J Hayes, Rashida A Ferrand
{"title":"Effect of a community-based intervention for sexually transmitted infections on population-level prevalence among youth in Zimbabwe (STICH): a cluster-randomised trial.","authors":"Chido Dziva Chikwari, Ethel Dauya, Victoria Simms, Katharina Kranzer, Tsitsi Bandason, Anna Machiha, Owen Mugurungi, Primrose Musiyandaka, Tinashe Mwaturura, Nkazimulo Tshuma, Sarah Bernays, Constancia Mavodza, Mandikudza Tembo, Kevin Martin, Constance R S Mackworth-Young, Joanna Busza, Suzanna C Francis, Richard J Hayes, Rashida A Ferrand","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00373-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young people are at particularly high risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We conducted a trial to investigate the effect of a community-based intervention that included STI screening among youth on population-level prevalence of STIs in Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>STICH was a parallel-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial nested within CHIEDZA, a trial of community-based integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for youth in Zimbabwe. STICH was conducted in Harare and Bulawayo provinces with eight clusters in each province, randomised 1:1 to control (existing health services) or to the intervention: community-based screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (males and females) and Trichomonas vaginalis (females only) offered over 12 months to intervention cluster residents aged 16-24 years who were attending CHIEDZA. Outcomes were ascertained through a population-level survey immediately after the intervention period, which included young people aged 18-24 years who lived in randomly selected households in each of the 16 clusters. The primary outcome was population prevalence of any (one or more) of the three STIs; secondary outcomes were prevalence of each of the three STIs. The STICH trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN15013425, and the CHIEDZA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03719521.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From Oct 6, 2021, to March 8, 2022, 6361 randomly sampled young people were recruited into the outcome survey (median age 20 years [IQR 19-22], 3500 female and 2101 male, 3066 in intervention clusters and 3295 in control clusters). 5601 participants were included in the primary outcome analysis (2756 in intervention clusters and 2845 in control clusters). In the intervention clusters, 612 (22·2%) of 2756 participants reported that they had attended CHIEDZA and 298 (10·8%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the control clusters, 113 (4·0%) of 2845 participants had attended CHIEDZA and 40 (1·4%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the outcome survey, the cluster-level geometric mean prevalence of the primary outcome (any of C trachomatis, N gonorrhoeae, and T vaginalis) was 19·07% (geometric standard deviation [GSD] 1·20) in the intervention arm versus 19·95% (GSD 1·10) in the control arm (risk ratio [RR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·78-1·10]; p=0·35). There was no difference between arms in geometric mean prevalence of C trachomatis (12·86% [GSD 1·14] in the intervention arm vs 12·94% [GSD 1·15] in the control arm, RR 0·97 [95% CI 0·84-1·11]; p=0·60) or T vaginalis (7·06% [GSD 1·48] vs 6·20% [1·38], RR 1·09 [95% CI 0·74-1·60]; p=0·66). N gonorrhoeae prevalence was significantly lower in the intervention arm, with a 43% risk reduction (geometric mean 1·65% [GSD 1·77] vs 2·87% [1·43], RR 0·57 [95% CI 0·34-0·96]; p=0·036).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our study showed high population prevalence of curable STIs. Community-based STI screening appeared to reduce population-level prevalence of N gonorrhoeae, but not of C trachomatis or T vaginalis, probably due to low intervention coverage. Future research is needed on the effects of screening interventions on morbidity, antimicrobial resistance, and re-infection rates.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department for International Development, National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the Wellcome Trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00373-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Young people are at particularly high risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We conducted a trial to investigate the effect of a community-based intervention that included STI screening among youth on population-level prevalence of STIs in Zimbabwe.

Methods: STICH was a parallel-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial nested within CHIEDZA, a trial of community-based integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for youth in Zimbabwe. STICH was conducted in Harare and Bulawayo provinces with eight clusters in each province, randomised 1:1 to control (existing health services) or to the intervention: community-based screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (males and females) and Trichomonas vaginalis (females only) offered over 12 months to intervention cluster residents aged 16-24 years who were attending CHIEDZA. Outcomes were ascertained through a population-level survey immediately after the intervention period, which included young people aged 18-24 years who lived in randomly selected households in each of the 16 clusters. The primary outcome was population prevalence of any (one or more) of the three STIs; secondary outcomes were prevalence of each of the three STIs. The STICH trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN15013425, and the CHIEDZA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03719521.

Findings: From Oct 6, 2021, to March 8, 2022, 6361 randomly sampled young people were recruited into the outcome survey (median age 20 years [IQR 19-22], 3500 female and 2101 male, 3066 in intervention clusters and 3295 in control clusters). 5601 participants were included in the primary outcome analysis (2756 in intervention clusters and 2845 in control clusters). In the intervention clusters, 612 (22·2%) of 2756 participants reported that they had attended CHIEDZA and 298 (10·8%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the control clusters, 113 (4·0%) of 2845 participants had attended CHIEDZA and 40 (1·4%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the outcome survey, the cluster-level geometric mean prevalence of the primary outcome (any of C trachomatis, N gonorrhoeae, and T vaginalis) was 19·07% (geometric standard deviation [GSD] 1·20) in the intervention arm versus 19·95% (GSD 1·10) in the control arm (risk ratio [RR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·78-1·10]; p=0·35). There was no difference between arms in geometric mean prevalence of C trachomatis (12·86% [GSD 1·14] in the intervention arm vs 12·94% [GSD 1·15] in the control arm, RR 0·97 [95% CI 0·84-1·11]; p=0·60) or T vaginalis (7·06% [GSD 1·48] vs 6·20% [1·38], RR 1·09 [95% CI 0·74-1·60]; p=0·66). N gonorrhoeae prevalence was significantly lower in the intervention arm, with a 43% risk reduction (geometric mean 1·65% [GSD 1·77] vs 2·87% [1·43], RR 0·57 [95% CI 0·34-0·96]; p=0·036).

Interpretation: Our study showed high population prevalence of curable STIs. Community-based STI screening appeared to reduce population-level prevalence of N gonorrhoeae, but not of C trachomatis or T vaginalis, probably due to low intervention coverage. Future research is needed on the effects of screening interventions on morbidity, antimicrobial resistance, and re-infection rates.

Funding: Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department for International Development, National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the Wellcome Trust.

以社区为基础的性传播感染干预措施对津巴布韦青年人群感染率的影响(STICH):分组随机试验。
背景:年轻人感染性传播疾病(STI)的风险特别高。我们在津巴布韦开展了一项试验,调查在青少年中开展包括性传播感染筛查在内的社区干预措施对性传播感染人群患病率的影响:STICH是一项平行臂、分组随机对照试验,嵌套于CHIEDZA试验中,CHIEDZA是一项针对津巴布韦青少年的社区艾滋病、性健康和生殖健康综合服务试验。STICH 在哈拉雷省和布拉瓦约省进行,每个省有 8 个群组,按 1:1 随机分配到对照组(现有医疗服务)或干预组:在 12 个月内为干预组中参加 CHIEDZA 的 16-24 岁居民提供沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌(男性和女性)以及阴道毛滴虫(仅女性)的社区筛查和治疗。干预期结束后立即进行的人口调查确定了干预结果,调查对象包括居住在 16 个群组中每个群组随机抽取的家庭中的 18-24 岁青少年。主要结果是三种性传播感染中任何一种(一种或多种)的人群感染率;次要结果是三种性传播感染中每一种的感染率。STICH试验已在ISRCTN注册机构ISRCTN15013425注册,CHIEDZA试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册机构NCT03719521注册:从2021年10月6日至2022年3月8日,共招募了6361名随机抽样的年轻人参与结果调查(中位年龄20岁[IQR 19-22],女性3500人,男性2101人,干预群组3066人,对照群组3295人)。5601 名参与者被纳入主要结果分析(干预组 2756 人,对照组 2845 人)。在干预群组中,2756 名参与者中有 612 人(22-2%)表示参加过 CHIEDZA,298 人(10-8%)接受过沙眼衣原体和淋球菌检测。在对照组群中,2845 名参与者中有 113 人(4-0%)参加过 CHIEDZA,40 人(1-4%)接受过沙眼衣原体和淋球菌检测。在结果调查中,干预组主要结果(沙眼衣原体、淋球菌和阴道球菌中的任何一种)的群组级几何平均流行率为 19-07%(几何标准差 [GSD] 1-20),而对照组为 19-95%(几何标准差 1-10)(风险比 [RR] 0-93 [95% CI 0-78-1-10];P=0-35)。干预组和对照组的沙眼衣原体几何平均感染率(干预组为 12-86% [GSD 1-14] vs 对照组为 12-94% [GSD 1-15],RR 0-97 [95% CI 0-84-1-11];P=0-60)或阴道球菌几何平均感染率(干预组为 7-06% [GSD 1-48] vs 对照组为 6-20% [1-38],RR 1-09 [95% CI 0-74-1-60];P=0-66)没有差异。干预组的淋球菌感染率明显降低,风险降低了 43%(几何平均数 1-65% [GSD 1-77] vs 2-87% [1-43],RR 0-57 [95% CI 0-34-0-96];P=0-036):我们的研究表明,可治愈的性传播感染在人群中的发病率很高。基于社区的性传播感染筛查似乎降低了淋球菌在人群中的流行率,但没有降低沙眼衣原体或阴道球菌的流行率,这可能是由于干预覆盖率较低。今后需要对筛查干预措施对发病率、抗菌素耐药性和再感染率的影响进行研究:资助机构:医学研究委员会、经济与社会研究委员会、国际发展部、国家健康与护理研究所和惠康基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信