The reused-disposable scope in flexible ureteroscopy for stones as a cost-conscious approach: Reporting the outcomes of a real-world practice multicenter study of 2183 patients by the team of worldwide endourological researchers group.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Vineet Gauhar, Olivier Traxer, Ravindra B Sabnis, Khi Yung Fong, Parimalsinh Gharia, Rishi Grover, Deepak Ragoori, Ee Jean Lim, Yiloren Tanidir, Amish Mehta, Mehmet Ilker Gökce, Mohamed Amine Lakmichi, Boyke Soebhali, Nariman Gadzhiev, Ben H Chew, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Daniele Castellani
{"title":"The reused-disposable scope in flexible ureteroscopy for stones as a cost-conscious approach: Reporting the outcomes of a real-world practice multicenter study of 2183 patients by the team of worldwide endourological researchers group.","authors":"Vineet Gauhar, Olivier Traxer, Ravindra B Sabnis, Khi Yung Fong, Parimalsinh Gharia, Rishi Grover, Deepak Ragoori, Ee Jean Lim, Yiloren Tanidir, Amish Mehta, Mehmet Ilker Gökce, Mohamed Amine Lakmichi, Boyke Soebhali, Nariman Gadzhiev, Ben H Chew, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Daniele Castellani","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_38_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to assess complications and stone-free rate of flexible ureteroscopy (FU) reusing disposable scopes (RDS) after repeated sterilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from adults from 11 centers were retrospectively reviewed (January 2020-December 2022). Inclusion criteria were proximal ureteral/renal stone(s). All cases were performed using an RDS to save costs for patients who come from economically challenged environments. Residual fragments (RFs) were defined as single fragment ≥4 mm or multiple fragments of any size within 3 months. Continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two thousand one hundred and eighty-three patients were included, of whom 67.0% were male. Median age was 48.0 (36-59) years. The median stone diameter was 10.2 (9-14) mm. Flash sterilization was used in 90.2% (plasma in 60.5%). Approximately, 88% had FU with an RDS used ≤2 times (12%: 3-5 times). RDS needed to be changed intraoperatively in 3.9% of cases due to its malfunction. Commonly, defects in RDS function were reported in upward (1.6%) and downward deflection (6.5%) and image quality on white balancing (4.7%). Fever >38C was seen in 13.7% of cases, and sepsis in 0.5%. RFs were found in 31.4% of cases. Lower pole (odds ratio [OR] 5.63) or pelvis stone (OR 4.67), faulty scopes (OR 12.8), and total operation time (OR 1.05) were factors associated with higher odds of RFs. Stone size (OR 1.09), positive urine culture (OR 1.67), interpolar stone (OR 1.68), and prestenting (OR 1.37) were factors associated with higher odds of fever/sepsis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RDS was used as a cost-conscious approach with a low rate of serious infections but with a high rate of RFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"40 4","pages":"235-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_38_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess complications and stone-free rate of flexible ureteroscopy (FU) reusing disposable scopes (RDS) after repeated sterilization.

Methods: Data from adults from 11 centers were retrospectively reviewed (January 2020-December 2022). Inclusion criteria were proximal ureteral/renal stone(s). All cases were performed using an RDS to save costs for patients who come from economically challenged environments. Residual fragments (RFs) were defined as single fragment ≥4 mm or multiple fragments of any size within 3 months. Continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range.

Results: Two thousand one hundred and eighty-three patients were included, of whom 67.0% were male. Median age was 48.0 (36-59) years. The median stone diameter was 10.2 (9-14) mm. Flash sterilization was used in 90.2% (plasma in 60.5%). Approximately, 88% had FU with an RDS used ≤2 times (12%: 3-5 times). RDS needed to be changed intraoperatively in 3.9% of cases due to its malfunction. Commonly, defects in RDS function were reported in upward (1.6%) and downward deflection (6.5%) and image quality on white balancing (4.7%). Fever >38C was seen in 13.7% of cases, and sepsis in 0.5%. RFs were found in 31.4% of cases. Lower pole (odds ratio [OR] 5.63) or pelvis stone (OR 4.67), faulty scopes (OR 12.8), and total operation time (OR 1.05) were factors associated with higher odds of RFs. Stone size (OR 1.09), positive urine culture (OR 1.67), interpolar stone (OR 1.68), and prestenting (OR 1.37) were factors associated with higher odds of fever/sepsis.

Conclusions: RDS was used as a cost-conscious approach with a low rate of serious infections but with a high rate of RFs.

柔性输尿管镜检查结石中的重复使用一次性镜片是一种具有成本意识的方法:报告全球输尿管内镜研究小组对2183名患者进行的实际多中心研究的结果。
简介:我们的目的是评估重复使用一次性尿道镜(RDS)的并发症和无结石率:我们旨在评估反复消毒后重复使用一次性柔性输尿管镜(FU)的并发症和无结石率:方法:回顾性审查了 11 个中心的成人数据(2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月)。纳入标准为近端输尿管/肾结石。所有病例均使用 RDS 进行手术,以节省来自经济困难环境的患者的费用。残留碎片(RF)的定义是单个碎片≥4毫米或3个月内有多个任何大小的碎片。连续变量以中位数和四分位数间距表示:共纳入 2183 名患者,其中 67.0% 为男性。年龄中位数为 48.0(36-59)岁。结石直径中位数为 10.2(9-14)毫米。90.2%的患者采用了闪烁灭菌法(60.5%采用血浆灭菌法)。约88%的患者在使用RDS时FU使用次数不足2次(12%:3-5次)。有 3.9% 的病例因 RDS 出现故障而需要在术中更换。RDS功能缺陷常见于上偏转(1.6%)和下偏转(6.5%)以及白平衡图像质量(4.7%)。13.7% 的病例发烧超过 38 摄氏度,0.5% 的病例出现败血症。31.4%的病例出现射频。较低的极点(比值比 [OR] 5.63)或盆腔结石(比值比 4.67)、错误的探头(比值比 12.8)和总手术时间(比值比 1.05)是导致 RFs 发生率较高的相关因素。结石大小(OR1.09)、尿培养阳性(OR1.67)、极间结石(OR1.68)和前置引流(OR1.37)与发热/败血症几率较高相关:RDS是一种具有成本意识的方法,严重感染率较低,但RF率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信