Classifying the Perception of Difficult Life Tasks: Machine Learning and/or Modeling of Logical Processes.

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art Pub Date : 2024-06-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11621/pir.2024.0205
Ekaterina V Biyutskaya, Elyar E Gasanov, Kseniia V Khazova, Nikita A Patrashkin
{"title":"Classifying the Perception of Difficult Life Tasks: Machine Learning and/or Modeling of Logical Processes.","authors":"Ekaterina V Biyutskaya, Elyar E Gasanov, Kseniia V Khazova, Nikita A Patrashkin","doi":"10.11621/pir.2024.0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although quite a few classifications of coping strategies have been proposed, with different premises, much less is known about the methods of interpretation and how people using different types of coping perceive their life difficulties.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a verifiable algorithm for classifying perceived difficulties. The proposed classification was developed deductively, using \"approach-avoidance\" as the basis for cognitive activity aimed at taking on (approaching) a difficult situation or escaping from it, avoiding a solution to the problem. The classification comprises 1) driven, 2) maximal, 3) optimal, 4) ambivalent, and 5) evasive types of perception of difficult life tasks (DLTs). Types 1, 2, and 3 correspond to approaching a difficult situation, and 5 to avoiding it. Type 4 involves a combination of approach and avoidance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The type is determined by an expert psychologist in a complex way, based on a combination of 1) the respondent's profile according to the \"Types of Orientations in Difficult Situations\" questionnaire (TODS) and 2) features that are significant for the type as shown in qualitative data - descriptions of DLTs (answers to open questions). Machine learning methods and A.S. Podkolzin's computer modeling of logical processes are used to develop the algorithm. The sample comprised 611 adult participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 25; SD = 5.8; 427 women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using machine-learning algorithms, various options were tested for separation into classes; the best results were obtained with a combination of markup and questionnaire features and sequential separation of classes. Using computer modeling of logical processes, classification rules were tested, based on the psychologist's description of the features of the type of perception. The classification accuracy using these rules of the final algorithm is 77.17% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An algorithm was obtained that allows step-by-step tracing of the process by which a classification problem is solved by the psychologist. We propose a new model for studying situational perception using a mixed research design and computer-modeling methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"17 2","pages":"64-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2024.0205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although quite a few classifications of coping strategies have been proposed, with different premises, much less is known about the methods of interpretation and how people using different types of coping perceive their life difficulties.

Objective: To develop a verifiable algorithm for classifying perceived difficulties. The proposed classification was developed deductively, using "approach-avoidance" as the basis for cognitive activity aimed at taking on (approaching) a difficult situation or escaping from it, avoiding a solution to the problem. The classification comprises 1) driven, 2) maximal, 3) optimal, 4) ambivalent, and 5) evasive types of perception of difficult life tasks (DLTs). Types 1, 2, and 3 correspond to approaching a difficult situation, and 5 to avoiding it. Type 4 involves a combination of approach and avoidance.

Design: The type is determined by an expert psychologist in a complex way, based on a combination of 1) the respondent's profile according to the "Types of Orientations in Difficult Situations" questionnaire (TODS) and 2) features that are significant for the type as shown in qualitative data - descriptions of DLTs (answers to open questions). Machine learning methods and A.S. Podkolzin's computer modeling of logical processes are used to develop the algorithm. The sample comprised 611 adult participants (Mage = 25; SD = 5.8; 427 women).

Results: Using machine-learning algorithms, various options were tested for separation into classes; the best results were obtained with a combination of markup and questionnaire features and sequential separation of classes. Using computer modeling of logical processes, classification rules were tested, based on the psychologist's description of the features of the type of perception. The classification accuracy using these rules of the final algorithm is 77.17% of cases.

Conclusion: An algorithm was obtained that allows step-by-step tracing of the process by which a classification problem is solved by the psychologist. We propose a new model for studying situational perception using a mixed research design and computer-modeling methods.

对困难生活任务的感知进行分类:机器学习和/或逻辑过程建模。
背景:尽管已经提出了许多应对策略的分类方法,但对其解释方法以及使用不同类型应对方法的人如何看待其生活困难却知之甚少:目标:开发一种可验证的算法,对感知到的困难进行分类。提出的分类方法是以 "接近-回避 "为基础,通过演绎的方式来制定的。"接近-回避 "是一种认知活动,其目的是接受(接近)困境或逃避困境,回避问题的解决。这种分类包括:1)驱动型、2)最大型、3)最佳型、4)矛盾型和 5)回避型对生活困难任务(DLTs)的认知类型。类型 1、2 和 3 与接近困境相对应,类型 5 与回避困境相对应。第 4 种类型是接近和回避的结合:设计:类型由心理专家以一种复杂的方式确定,其依据是:1)根据 "困境取向类型 "问卷(TODS)得出的受访者特征;2)定性数据--对 DLT 的描述(对开放性问题的回答)--中显示的对该类型具有重要意义的特征。该算法采用了机器学习方法和 A.S. Podkolzin 的逻辑过程计算机建模方法。样本包括 611 名成年参与者(年龄 = 25;SD = 5.8;427 名女性):结果:使用机器学习算法,测试了各种分班方案;结合标记和问卷特征以及按顺序分班的方法取得了最佳结果。根据心理学家对感知类型特征的描述,利用计算机逻辑过程建模对分类规则进行了测试。使用这些规则的最终算法的分类准确率为 77.17%:我们获得了一种算法,可以逐步追踪心理学家解决分类问题的过程。我们提出了一种使用混合研究设计和计算机建模方法研究情境感知的新模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信