{"title":"Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization.","authors":"Kai Wang, Steven Y Alberding","doi":"10.1002/sim.10279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The success of a Mendelian randomization (MR) study critically depends on the validity of the assumptions underlying MR. We focus on detecting heterogeneity (also known as horizontal pleiotropy) in two-sample summary-data MR. A popular approach is to apply Cochran's <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation></semantics> </math> statistic method, developed for meta-analysis. However, Cochran's <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation></semantics> </math> statistic, including its modifications, is known to lack power when its degrees of freedom are large. Furthermore, there is no theoretical justification for the claimed null distribution of the minimum of the modified Cochran's <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation></semantics> </math> statistic with exact weighting ( <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>min</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {Q}_{\\mathrm{min}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), although it seems to perform well in simulation studies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The principle of our proposed method is straightforward: if a set of variables are valid instruments, then any linear combination of these variables is still a valid instrument. Specifically, this principle holds when these linear combinations are formed using eigenvectors derived from a variance matrix. Each linear combination follows a known normal distribution from which a <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ p $$</annotation></semantics> </math> value can be calculated. We use the minimum <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ p $$</annotation></semantics> </math> value for these eigenvector-based linear combinations as the test statistic. Additionally, we explore a modification of the modified Cochran's <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation></semantics> </math> statistic by replacing the weighting matrix with a truncated singular value decomposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extensive simulation studies reveal that the proposed methods outperform Cochran's <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation></semantics> </math> statistic, including those with modified weights, and MR-PRESSO, another popular method for detecting heterogeneity, in cases where the number of instruments is not large or the Wald ratios take two values. We also demonstrate these methods using empirical examples. Furthermore, we show that <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>Q</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>min</mi></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {Q}_{\\mathrm{min}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> does not follow, but is dominated by, the claimed null chi-square distribution. The proposed methods are implemented in an R package iGasso.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dimension reduction techniques are useful for generating powerful tests of heterogeneity in MR.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The success of a Mendelian randomization (MR) study critically depends on the validity of the assumptions underlying MR. We focus on detecting heterogeneity (also known as horizontal pleiotropy) in two-sample summary-data MR. A popular approach is to apply Cochran's statistic method, developed for meta-analysis. However, Cochran's statistic, including its modifications, is known to lack power when its degrees of freedom are large. Furthermore, there is no theoretical justification for the claimed null distribution of the minimum of the modified Cochran's statistic with exact weighting ( ), although it seems to perform well in simulation studies.
Method: The principle of our proposed method is straightforward: if a set of variables are valid instruments, then any linear combination of these variables is still a valid instrument. Specifically, this principle holds when these linear combinations are formed using eigenvectors derived from a variance matrix. Each linear combination follows a known normal distribution from which a value can be calculated. We use the minimum value for these eigenvector-based linear combinations as the test statistic. Additionally, we explore a modification of the modified Cochran's statistic by replacing the weighting matrix with a truncated singular value decomposition.
Results: Extensive simulation studies reveal that the proposed methods outperform Cochran's statistic, including those with modified weights, and MR-PRESSO, another popular method for detecting heterogeneity, in cases where the number of instruments is not large or the Wald ratios take two values. We also demonstrate these methods using empirical examples. Furthermore, we show that does not follow, but is dominated by, the claimed null chi-square distribution. The proposed methods are implemented in an R package iGasso.
Conclusions: Dimension reduction techniques are useful for generating powerful tests of heterogeneity in MR.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.