Incidence and Characterization of Facial Lacerations in Emergency Departments in the United States.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Heather Peluso, Kevin Vega, Sthefano Araya, Lindsay Talemal, Civanni Moss, Jake Siegel, Adam Walchak
{"title":"Incidence and Characterization of Facial Lacerations in Emergency Departments in the United States.","authors":"Heather Peluso, Kevin Vega, Sthefano Araya, Lindsay Talemal, Civanni Moss, Jake Siegel, Adam Walchak","doi":"10.1177/19433875241257572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Facial laceration repairs are one of the most common procedures performed in the emergency department (ED). The goal of this study was to describe the patient's characteristics and healthcare cost associated with ED encounters for facial lacerations using the largest nationally representative database in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. The data was collected between January and December of 2019. Patients with either a primary or secondary diagnosis of facial laceration were included. The primary outcome was patient characteristics. The secondary outcomes were ED characteristics, number and type of procedures performed and total encounter charges. Diagnoses and procedures were identified using ICD-10 CM codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,548,944 ED encounters for facial lacerations in the United States. Of those, laceration was the chief complaint in 75%. 80% of lacerations were unintentional, 8% were due to assaults, and <1% due to suicidal attempts. The most common laceration location was the scalp (21%) followed by the lip (11%) and eyelid (11%). The mean patient age was 38 years. Most patients were adults (69%), male (62%), Caucasian (64%, African American 14%, Hispanic 14%, Other 4%, Asian 2%), from low income levels ($1-$45,999: 29%, $46,000- $58,999: 24%, $59,000-$78,999: 24%, $79,000 or more: 23%), with private insurance (32%, Medicaid 25%, Medicare 24%, self-pay 12%, other 6%). Most encounters were during summer (June, July, August) at large metropolitan areas with at least 1 million residents (52%, small metropolitan: 30%, micropolitan: 10%, other: 7%) at teaching hospitals (65%) located in the southern region of the United States (37%, Midwest: 23%, west: 21%, northeast: 19%). Almost half of the encounters were at non-trauma-designated hospitals (48%, Level 1 trauma center: 21%, Level 2 trauma center: 17%, Level 3 trauma center: 13%). The number of procedures during each encounter was: none: 4%, one: 17%, two: 23%, three: 11%, four: 11%, five or more: 28%. The most frequent laceration repair was a simple repair of superficial wounds of the face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips, and/or mucous membranes 2.5 cm or less, followed by simple repair of superficial wounds to the scalp, neck, axillae, external genitalia, trunk, and/or extremities 2.5 cm or less. Most emergency department visits were billed as a Level 3 encounter, followed by Level 2 then Level 4. CT scan of the head was the most common imaging modality. Of all patients, <1% were admitted to the hospital and 87% were discharged home. The average total emergency department charges were $5,733.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facial laceration is a common complaint in the emergency department. It is costly, and disproportionately affects the impoverished. Most lacerations are classified as simple, less than 2.5 cm, involving the scalp, unintentional, with the discharge disposition being home. Thus, exploring pathways to treat facial lacerations outside of the ED can potentially reduce both healthcare cost and ED crowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"19433875241257572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241257572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.

Objective: Facial laceration repairs are one of the most common procedures performed in the emergency department (ED). The goal of this study was to describe the patient's characteristics and healthcare cost associated with ED encounters for facial lacerations using the largest nationally representative database in the United States.

Methods: This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. The data was collected between January and December of 2019. Patients with either a primary or secondary diagnosis of facial laceration were included. The primary outcome was patient characteristics. The secondary outcomes were ED characteristics, number and type of procedures performed and total encounter charges. Diagnoses and procedures were identified using ICD-10 CM codes.

Results: There were 2,548,944 ED encounters for facial lacerations in the United States. Of those, laceration was the chief complaint in 75%. 80% of lacerations were unintentional, 8% were due to assaults, and <1% due to suicidal attempts. The most common laceration location was the scalp (21%) followed by the lip (11%) and eyelid (11%). The mean patient age was 38 years. Most patients were adults (69%), male (62%), Caucasian (64%, African American 14%, Hispanic 14%, Other 4%, Asian 2%), from low income levels ($1-$45,999: 29%, $46,000- $58,999: 24%, $59,000-$78,999: 24%, $79,000 or more: 23%), with private insurance (32%, Medicaid 25%, Medicare 24%, self-pay 12%, other 6%). Most encounters were during summer (June, July, August) at large metropolitan areas with at least 1 million residents (52%, small metropolitan: 30%, micropolitan: 10%, other: 7%) at teaching hospitals (65%) located in the southern region of the United States (37%, Midwest: 23%, west: 21%, northeast: 19%). Almost half of the encounters were at non-trauma-designated hospitals (48%, Level 1 trauma center: 21%, Level 2 trauma center: 17%, Level 3 trauma center: 13%). The number of procedures during each encounter was: none: 4%, one: 17%, two: 23%, three: 11%, four: 11%, five or more: 28%. The most frequent laceration repair was a simple repair of superficial wounds of the face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips, and/or mucous membranes 2.5 cm or less, followed by simple repair of superficial wounds to the scalp, neck, axillae, external genitalia, trunk, and/or extremities 2.5 cm or less. Most emergency department visits were billed as a Level 3 encounter, followed by Level 2 then Level 4. CT scan of the head was the most common imaging modality. Of all patients, <1% were admitted to the hospital and 87% were discharged home. The average total emergency department charges were $5,733.

Conclusions: Facial laceration is a common complaint in the emergency department. It is costly, and disproportionately affects the impoverished. Most lacerations are classified as simple, less than 2.5 cm, involving the scalp, unintentional, with the discharge disposition being home. Thus, exploring pathways to treat facial lacerations outside of the ED can potentially reduce both healthcare cost and ED crowding.

美国急诊科面部撕裂伤的发生率和特征。
研究设计:这是一项利用全国急诊科样本进行的回顾性研究:面部裂伤修复是急诊科(ED)最常见的手术之一。本研究的目的是利用美国最大的具有全国代表性的数据库,描述因面部裂伤而到急诊科就诊的患者特征和相关医疗费用:这是一项利用全国急诊科样本进行的回顾性研究。数据收集时间为 2019 年 1 月至 12 月。研究纳入了初诊或复诊为面部裂伤的患者。主要结果是患者特征。次要结果为急诊室特征、所实施手术的数量和类型以及总诊疗费用。诊断和手术均使用 ICD-10 CM 编码:结果:在美国,共有 2,548,944 例急诊室就诊者因面部撕裂伤就诊。其中 75% 的主诉是撕裂伤。80%的撕裂伤是无意造成的,8%的撕裂伤是由于攻击造成的:面部撕裂伤是急诊科的常见病。这种疾病代价高昂,对贫困人群的影响尤为严重。大多数撕裂伤被归类为简单的、小于 2.5 厘米的、涉及头皮的、非故意的撕裂伤,出院处置为回家。因此,探索在急诊室以外治疗面部撕裂伤的途径有可能降低医疗成本和急诊室的拥挤程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信