In- Versus Out-Fracture: A Novel Concept in Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Injury.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jesse Menville, Luke Soliman, Nidhi Shinde, Carole Spake, Stephanie Francalancia, Josue Marquez-Garcia, Nikhil Sobti, Vinay Rao, Albert S Woo
{"title":"In- Versus Out-Fracture: A Novel Concept in Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Injury.","authors":"Jesse Menville, Luke Soliman, Nidhi Shinde, Carole Spake, Stephanie Francalancia, Josue Marquez-Garcia, Nikhil Sobti, Vinay Rao, Albert S Woo","doi":"10.1177/19433875241280781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Markowitz-Manson classification system categorizes nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures by severity of injury and remaining integrity of the medial canthal tendon. However, this system does not account for direction of bony displacement (in-fracture vs out-fracture), which can greatly affect symptomatology and management. We hypothesize that NOE fractures will present differently based upon their severity: Type I injuries are likely to present with medial nasal bone displacement (in-fracture), whereas Type III fractures will be more prone to lateral displacement (out-fracture).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed for all patients with NOE fractures who were evaluated by the plastic surgery department at a level 1 trauma center over a 6-year period. Computed tomography data were evaluated to assess for directionality of fracture segment displacement. Frequencies of medial, lateral, and non-displacement across NOE types were compared by Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit and Fisher's Exact Tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>111 patients met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 73.9% male and averaged 51.2 years old. When bilateral fractures were counted independently, there were 141 cases in total: 115 Type I, 20 Type II, and 6 Type III. Type I fractures were most commonly in-fractured (48.7%), while Type III injuries were consistently out-fractured (100%) (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While Type II and III NOE fractures have dominated clinical focus, this study highlights the prevalence of impaction within Type I fractures. These findings advocate for a more comprehensive approach to the evaluation of Type I NOE fractures and their potential risks, including traumatic hypotelorism and nasal airway obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"19433875241280781"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241280781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective study.

Objective: The Markowitz-Manson classification system categorizes nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures by severity of injury and remaining integrity of the medial canthal tendon. However, this system does not account for direction of bony displacement (in-fracture vs out-fracture), which can greatly affect symptomatology and management. We hypothesize that NOE fractures will present differently based upon their severity: Type I injuries are likely to present with medial nasal bone displacement (in-fracture), whereas Type III fractures will be more prone to lateral displacement (out-fracture).

Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all patients with NOE fractures who were evaluated by the plastic surgery department at a level 1 trauma center over a 6-year period. Computed tomography data were evaluated to assess for directionality of fracture segment displacement. Frequencies of medial, lateral, and non-displacement across NOE types were compared by Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit and Fisher's Exact Tests.

Results: 111 patients met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 73.9% male and averaged 51.2 years old. When bilateral fractures were counted independently, there were 141 cases in total: 115 Type I, 20 Type II, and 6 Type III. Type I fractures were most commonly in-fractured (48.7%), while Type III injuries were consistently out-fractured (100%) (p < .001).

Conclusions: While Type II and III NOE fractures have dominated clinical focus, this study highlights the prevalence of impaction within Type I fractures. These findings advocate for a more comprehensive approach to the evaluation of Type I NOE fractures and their potential risks, including traumatic hypotelorism and nasal airway obstruction.

内骨折与外骨折:鼻-眼-蝶骨损伤的新概念。
研究设计回顾性研究:马科维茨-曼森(Markowitz-Manson)分类系统根据损伤的严重程度和内侧眼肌腱的剩余完整性对鼻骨乙状韧带(NOE)骨折进行分类。然而,该系统并不考虑骨移位的方向(骨折内与骨折外),而骨移位的方向会对症状和治疗产生很大影响。我们假设,NOE 骨折会根据其严重程度表现出不同的症状:Ⅰ型损伤可能表现为鼻骨内侧移位(骨折内),而Ⅲ型骨折则更容易表现为鼻骨外侧移位(骨折外):方法:我们对一级创伤中心整形外科在 6 年内评估过的所有 NOE 骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。对计算机断层扫描数据进行评估,以确定骨折段移位的方向性。通过Chi-Squared拟合优度检验和费雪精确检验比较了不同NOE类型的内侧、外侧和无移位的频率:111 名患者符合纳入标准。患者中73.9%为男性,平均年龄为51.2岁。如果将双侧骨折单独计算,则共有 141 例:115 例 I 型骨折、20 例 II 型骨折和 6 例 III 型骨折。I型骨折最常见的是内骨折(48.7%),而III型损伤则一直是外骨折(100%)(p < .001):结论:虽然 II 型和 III 型 NOE 骨折一直是临床关注的焦点,但本研究强调了 I 型骨折中撞击的普遍性。这些发现主张采用更全面的方法来评估 I 型 NOE 骨折及其潜在风险,包括创伤性张力过低和鼻气道阻塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信