Role of unilateral-cannulating adrenal venous sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism for adrenalectomy: Experience from a low-volume center.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Chi-Man Tom Chow, Man Sze Carol Lai, Xina Lo, Yuk Wah Shirley Liu
{"title":"Role of unilateral-cannulating adrenal venous sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism for adrenalectomy: Experience from a low-volume center.","authors":"Chi-Man Tom Chow, Man Sze Carol Lai, Xina Lo, Yuk Wah Shirley Liu","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend adrenal venous sampling (AVS) for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA). However, bilateral adrenal cannulation failure is common especially at low-volume centers. The role of unilateral-cannulating AVS in selecting patients for unilateral adrenalectomy is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty consecutive patients underwent AVS between 2009 and 2023 and thirty-three (66%) underwent unilateral adrenalectomy. We defined unilateral PA (uPA) by the normalized plasma aldosterone and the aldosterone-renin ratio following unilateral adrenalectomy. We examined the effectiveness of unilateral-cannulating AVS in identifying uPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>88%, 50%, and 48% of patients had the left, right, and bilateral adrenal veins successfully cannulated, respectively. Among patients with bilateral successful cannulation, a lateralization index (LI) > 4 provided a sensitivity of 100% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.7% for uPA. Thresholds for the contralateral suppression index (CSI) and relative aldosterone secretion index (RASI) were derived from this subgroup and applied to the entire cohort. CSI <0.5 demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.5% and PPV of 92.9% for uPA, whereas RASI >2.4 showed a sensitivity of 85.0% and PPV of 94.4% for uPA. With CSI <0.5 or RASI >2.4 combined, a higher PPV (95.5%) was achieved when compared to computed tomography and iodocholesterol scintigraphy (86.2% and 62.5%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite unsuccessful bilateral cannulation, our study confirms that unilateral-cannulating AVS can effectively select patients for unilateral adrenalectomy based on a combination of CSI or RASI criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend adrenal venous sampling (AVS) for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA). However, bilateral adrenal cannulation failure is common especially at low-volume centers. The role of unilateral-cannulating AVS in selecting patients for unilateral adrenalectomy is unclear.

Methods: Fifty consecutive patients underwent AVS between 2009 and 2023 and thirty-three (66%) underwent unilateral adrenalectomy. We defined unilateral PA (uPA) by the normalized plasma aldosterone and the aldosterone-renin ratio following unilateral adrenalectomy. We examined the effectiveness of unilateral-cannulating AVS in identifying uPA.

Results: 88%, 50%, and 48% of patients had the left, right, and bilateral adrenal veins successfully cannulated, respectively. Among patients with bilateral successful cannulation, a lateralization index (LI) > 4 provided a sensitivity of 100% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.7% for uPA. Thresholds for the contralateral suppression index (CSI) and relative aldosterone secretion index (RASI) were derived from this subgroup and applied to the entire cohort. CSI <0.5 demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.5% and PPV of 92.9% for uPA, whereas RASI >2.4 showed a sensitivity of 85.0% and PPV of 94.4% for uPA. With CSI <0.5 or RASI >2.4 combined, a higher PPV (95.5%) was achieved when compared to computed tomography and iodocholesterol scintigraphy (86.2% and 62.5%, respectively).

Conclusion: Despite unsuccessful bilateral cannulation, our study confirms that unilateral-cannulating AVS can effectively select patients for unilateral adrenalectomy based on a combination of CSI or RASI criteria.

单侧封闭肾上腺静脉取样在肾上腺切除术原发性醛固酮增多症亚型鉴定中的作用:一家低容量中心的经验。
背景:现行指南建议采用肾上腺静脉采样(AVS)对原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)进行分型。然而,双侧肾上腺插管失败很常见,尤其是在低容量中心。单侧插管 AVS 在选择单侧肾上腺切除术患者方面的作用尚不明确:方法:2009 年至 2023 年间,连续 50 例患者接受了 AVS,其中 33 例(66%)接受了单侧肾上腺切除术。我们通过单侧肾上腺切除术后正常化的血浆醛固酮和醛固酮-肾素比值来定义单侧 PA(uPA)。我们研究了单侧封闭式 AVS 识别 uPA 的有效性:结果:分别有 88%、50% 和 48% 的患者成功进行了左侧、右侧和双侧肾上腺静脉插管。在双侧成功插管的患者中,侧化指数 (LI) > 4 对 uPA 的敏感性为 100%,阳性预测值 (PPV) 为 86.7%。根据该亚组得出了对侧抑制指数(CSI)和相对醛固酮分泌指数(RASI)的阈值,并将其应用于整个队列。CSI 2.4 对 uPA 的灵敏度为 85.0%,PPV 为 94.4%。与计算机断层扫描和碘胆固醇闪烁成像(分别为 86.2% 和 62.5%)相比,CSI 2.4 的综合 PPV 更高(95.5%):结论:尽管双侧插管不成功,但我们的研究证实,根据 CSI 或 RASI 标准,单侧插管的 AVS 可以有效地选择进行单侧肾上腺切除术的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信