Preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging does not impact surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Christopher K Bozorgmehr, Johnny Wang, James T Gross, Nicholas A Pickersgill, Joel M Vetter, Joseph E Ippolito, Eric H Kim
{"title":"Preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging does not impact surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Christopher K Bozorgmehr, Johnny Wang, James T Gross, Nicholas A Pickersgill, Joel M Vetter, Joseph E Ippolito, Eric H Kim","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_115_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We reviewed our institutional experience of radical prostatectomy with and without preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to assess the impact of preoperative prostate mpMRI on surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients at our institution who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) between January 2012 and December 2017 (<i>n</i> = 1044). Using propensity scoring analysis, patients who underwent preoperative mpMRI (<i>n</i> = 285) were matched 1:1 to patients who did not receive preoperative mpMRI (<i>n</i> = 285). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph node yield, rates of complications within 30 days, and positive surgical margin (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in operative time, EBL, PSM, lymph node yield, or complication rates between the two cohorts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative mpMRI was not predictive of the measured perioperative outcomes. Significant comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3) was the sole predictor of perioperative complications (<i>P</i> = 0.015). Increasing biopsy Gleason score predicted increased lymph node yield (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The probability of PSM was associated with increasing preoperative prostate-specific antigen (odds ratio 1.036, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Body mass index was a predictor of operative time (<i>P</i> = 0.016) and EBL (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although preoperative mpMRI has an important role in the diagnosis and staging of PCa, it does not impact perioperative radical prostatectomy outcomes. Our findings do not support the routine use of preoperative mpMRI for surgical planning in patients already diagnosed with clinically localized PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"40 4","pages":"266-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_115_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We reviewed our institutional experience of radical prostatectomy with and without preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to assess the impact of preoperative prostate mpMRI on surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy.

Methods: We identified patients at our institution who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) between January 2012 and December 2017 (n = 1044). Using propensity scoring analysis, patients who underwent preoperative mpMRI (n = 285) were matched 1:1 to patients who did not receive preoperative mpMRI (n = 285). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph node yield, rates of complications within 30 days, and positive surgical margin (PSM).

Results: There were no significant differences in operative time, EBL, PSM, lymph node yield, or complication rates between the two cohorts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative mpMRI was not predictive of the measured perioperative outcomes. Significant comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3) was the sole predictor of perioperative complications (P = 0.015). Increasing biopsy Gleason score predicted increased lymph node yield (P < 0.001). The probability of PSM was associated with increasing preoperative prostate-specific antigen (odds ratio 1.036, P = 0.009). Body mass index was a predictor of operative time (P = 0.016) and EBL (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Although preoperative mpMRI has an important role in the diagnosis and staging of PCa, it does not impact perioperative radical prostatectomy outcomes. Our findings do not support the routine use of preoperative mpMRI for surgical planning in patients already diagnosed with clinically localized PCa.

术前前列腺磁共振成像不会影响根治性前列腺切除术的手术效果。
目的:我们回顾了本机构在术前进行和未进行多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)的前列腺癌根治术的经验,以评估术前前列腺 mpMRI 对前列腺癌根治术手术结果的影响:我们确定了本院在2012年1月至2017年12月期间接受前列腺癌(PCa)根治性前列腺切除术的患者(n = 1044)。通过倾向评分分析,将接受术前mpMRI检查的患者(n = 285)与未接受术前mpMRI检查的患者(n = 285)进行1:1匹配。进行了多变量回归分析,以确定手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、淋巴结产量、30 天内并发症发生率和手术切缘阳性率(PSM)的预测因素:结果:两组患者的手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、PSM、淋巴结产量或并发症发生率均无明显差异。多变量分析表明,术前 mpMRI 不能预测围手术期的结果。显著的合并症(Charlson 合并症指数≥3)是围手术期并发症的唯一预测因素(P = 0.015)。活检 Gleason 评分的增加预示着淋巴结产量的增加(P < 0.001)。PSM的概率与术前前列腺特异性抗原的增加有关(几率比1.036,P = 0.009)。体重指数是手术时间(P = 0.016)和EBL(P = 0.001)的预测因子:尽管术前 mpMRI 在 PCa 的诊断和分期中发挥着重要作用,但它不会影响前列腺癌根治术的围手术期结果。我们的研究结果不支持将术前 mpMRI 常规用于已确诊为临床局部 PCa 患者的手术规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信