Survivorship and outcomes of arthroscopic bankart repair for anterior shoulder dislocations: A minimum of 2 year follow-up.

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kia Teng Lim, Wei Ping Marcus Tan, Andrew Hwee Chye Tan
{"title":"Survivorship and outcomes of arthroscopic bankart repair for anterior shoulder dislocations: A minimum of 2 year follow-up.","authors":"Kia Teng Lim, Wei Ping Marcus Tan, Andrew Hwee Chye Tan","doi":"10.1177/17585732241280247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate long-term survivorship of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>About 101 patients under a single surgeon were followed up for ≥2 years post-ABR. Primary outcome was survivorship, defined as re-dislocation post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included a range of motion, strength, pain, University of California-Los-Angeles shoulder score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), Constant Murley Score, and satisfaction. Clinical factors were correlated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients experienced postoperative dislocation (5 high-energy trauma, 2 low-energy trauma, 1 atraumatic), with 2 patients requiring revision. The mean time to post-operative dislocation was 1.5 years (range 0.3-3.8). Competitive athletes demonstrated worse survivorship (p = 0.027) but greater isometric strength at 6 months (p = 0.041) compared to recreational players. Patients ≥25 years old experienced slower recovery of internal rotation at 3 months (p = 0.006). Patients with surgery >1 year after injury had slower recovery of external rotation (p = 0.006), worse Constant scores at 3 months (p = 0.036) and lesser improvements in isometric strength at 3 months (p = 0.032). Patients with single pre-operative dislocations (p = 0.036 OSS; p = 0.039 OSIS) and patients ≥25 years old (p = 0.044 OSS) had worse Oxford scores at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ABR demonstrates good outcomes with low recurrence. This study prognosticates long-term outcomes across various subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241280247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241280247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate long-term survivorship of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR).

Methods: About 101 patients under a single surgeon were followed up for ≥2 years post-ABR. Primary outcome was survivorship, defined as re-dislocation post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included a range of motion, strength, pain, University of California-Los-Angeles shoulder score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), Constant Murley Score, and satisfaction. Clinical factors were correlated.

Results: Eight patients experienced postoperative dislocation (5 high-energy trauma, 2 low-energy trauma, 1 atraumatic), with 2 patients requiring revision. The mean time to post-operative dislocation was 1.5 years (range 0.3-3.8). Competitive athletes demonstrated worse survivorship (p = 0.027) but greater isometric strength at 6 months (p = 0.041) compared to recreational players. Patients ≥25 years old experienced slower recovery of internal rotation at 3 months (p = 0.006). Patients with surgery >1 year after injury had slower recovery of external rotation (p = 0.006), worse Constant scores at 3 months (p = 0.036) and lesser improvements in isometric strength at 3 months (p = 0.032). Patients with single pre-operative dislocations (p = 0.036 OSS; p = 0.039 OSIS) and patients ≥25 years old (p = 0.044 OSS) had worse Oxford scores at 3 months.

Discussion: ABR demonstrates good outcomes with low recurrence. This study prognosticates long-term outcomes across various subgroups.

肩关节前脱位的关节镜卍解修复术的存活率和疗效:至少两年的随访。
背景:本研究旨在评估关节镜下 Bankart 修复术(ABR)的长期存活率:本研究旨在评估关节镜下 Bankart 修复术(ABR)的长期存活率:方法:由一名外科医生对约 101 名患者进行了 ABR 术后≥2 年的随访。主要结果是存活率,定义为术后再次脱位。次要结果包括活动范围、力量、疼痛、加州大学洛杉矶分校肩关节评分、牛津肩关节评分(OSS)、牛津肩关节不稳定性评分(OSIS)、Constant Murley评分和满意度。结果:8名患者术后脱位(5名高能量创伤患者、2名低能量创伤患者、1名非创伤患者),其中2名患者需要进行翻修。术后脱位的平均时间为 1.5 年(0.3-3.8 年不等)。与休闲运动员相比,竞技运动员的存活率较低(p = 0.027),但在6个月时等长肌力较强(p = 0.041)。年龄≥25岁的患者在3个月时内旋恢复较慢(p = 0.006)。伤后一年以上接受手术的患者外旋恢复较慢(p = 0.006),3 个月时恒定评分较差(p = 0.036),3 个月时等长力量改善较小(p = 0.032)。术前单次脱位的患者(p = 0.036 OSS;p = 0.039 OSIS)和年龄≥25 岁的患者(p = 0.044 OSS)3 个月后的牛津评分较差:讨论:ABR疗效好,复发率低。本研究对不同亚组的长期预后进行了预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信