Real-world overall survival in second-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy versus active surveillance in patients with BRCA wild-type recurrent ovarian cancer.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359241292272
Robert L Coleman, Jessica A Perhanidis, Linda Kalilani, Nicole M Zimmerman, Amanda Golembesky, Kathleen N Moore
{"title":"Real-world overall survival in second-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy versus active surveillance in patients with <i>BRCA</i> wild-type recurrent ovarian cancer.","authors":"Robert L Coleman, Jessica A Perhanidis, Linda Kalilani, Nicole M Zimmerman, Amanda Golembesky, Kathleen N Moore","doi":"10.1177/17588359241292272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The NOVA study (NCT01847274) compared niraparib with placebo as a maintenance treatment for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) but was not powered to detect an overall survival (OS) improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare OS in a real-world population of patients with <i>BRCA</i> wild-type (<i>BRCA</i>wt) recurrent OC who received second-line maintenance (2LM) niraparib monotherapy versus active surveillance (AS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study using a US-based nationwide deidentified electronic health record-derived database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC (January 1, 2011-May 31, 2021) who completed second-line (2L) therapy (January 1, 2017-March 2, 2022) and were <i>BRCA</i>wt were included. A NOVA study-like subpopulation included patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1 and platinum-sensitive disease. Patients were assigned to 2LM niraparib or AS cohorts. Follow-up was measured from the index date (2L non-maintenance therapy end) until the first of study end (May 31, 2022), last clinical activity, or death. Median OS (mOS) and hazard ratios were estimated with an emulated trial methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall population comprised 199 patients in the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort and 707 patients in the AS cohort; the NOVA study-like subpopulation included 123 patients in the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort and 143 in the AS cohort. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both populations. Overall, adjusted mOS was 24.1 months for the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort versus 18.4 months for the AS cohort (hazard ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-0.9). In the NOVA study-like subpopulation, adjusted mOS was 28.1 months for the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort versus 21.5 months for the AS cohort (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide important real-world OS data for patients with recurrent <i>BRCA</i>wt OC who received niraparib monotherapy compared with patients receiving AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17588359241292272"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241292272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The NOVA study (NCT01847274) compared niraparib with placebo as a maintenance treatment for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) but was not powered to detect an overall survival (OS) improvement.

Objective: To compare OS in a real-world population of patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) recurrent OC who received second-line maintenance (2LM) niraparib monotherapy versus active surveillance (AS).

Design: A retrospective study using a US-based nationwide deidentified electronic health record-derived database.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC (January 1, 2011-May 31, 2021) who completed second-line (2L) therapy (January 1, 2017-March 2, 2022) and were BRCAwt were included. A NOVA study-like subpopulation included patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1 and platinum-sensitive disease. Patients were assigned to 2LM niraparib or AS cohorts. Follow-up was measured from the index date (2L non-maintenance therapy end) until the first of study end (May 31, 2022), last clinical activity, or death. Median OS (mOS) and hazard ratios were estimated with an emulated trial methodology.

Results: The overall population comprised 199 patients in the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort and 707 patients in the AS cohort; the NOVA study-like subpopulation included 123 patients in the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort and 143 in the AS cohort. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both populations. Overall, adjusted mOS was 24.1 months for the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort versus 18.4 months for the AS cohort (hazard ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-0.9). In the NOVA study-like subpopulation, adjusted mOS was 28.1 months for the 2LM niraparib monotherapy cohort versus 21.5 months for the AS cohort (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9).

Conclusion: These results provide important real-world OS data for patients with recurrent BRCAwt OC who received niraparib monotherapy compared with patients receiving AS.

BRCA 野生型复发性卵巢癌患者二线维持尼拉帕利单药治疗与积极监测的实际总生存率对比。
研究背景NOVA研究(NCT01847274)将尼拉帕利与安慰剂作为复发性卵巢癌(OC)患者的维持治疗进行了比较,但该研究未检测到总生存期(OS)的改善:比较BRCA野生型(BRCAwt)复发性卵巢癌患者接受尼拉帕尼单药二线维持治疗(2LM)与积极监测(AS)的实际OS情况:设计:一项回顾性研究,使用美国全国范围内的去身份化电子健康记录数据库:纳入已完成二线(2L)治疗(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 2 日)且 BRCAwt 的上皮性 OC 患者(2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日)。NOVA研究类亚群包括东方合作肿瘤学组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)表现状态评分为0-1分且对铂类药物敏感的患者。患者被分配到 2LM niraparib 或 AS 组。随访时间从指标日(2L非维持治疗结束)开始,直至研究结束(2022年5月31日)、最后一次临床活动或死亡的第一时间。中位OS(mOS)和危险比采用模拟试验方法进行估算:总体人群包括199名2LM尼拉帕利单药队列患者和707名AS队列患者;NOVA研究类亚人群包括123名2LM尼拉帕利单药队列患者和143名AS队列患者。两组人群的人口统计学特征和临床特征相似。总体而言,2LM 尼拉帕利单药队列的调整后 mOS 为 24.1 个月,而 AS 队列为 18.4 个月(危险比为 0.8;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.7-0.9)。在NOVA研究类似亚群中,2LM尼拉帕利单药队列的调整后mOS为28.1个月,而AS队列为21.5个月(危险比为0.6;95% 置信区间[CI]:0.5-0.9):这些结果为接受尼拉帕利单药治疗的复发性 BRCAwt OC 患者与接受 AS 治疗的患者提供了重要的真实世界 OS 数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信