Statewide Variation in Practices and Charges for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Maryland, United States: A Retrospective Study.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of Chest Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-05 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.5090/jcs.24.051
Grace Lassiter, Eric Etchill, Tamir Sholklapper, Charbel Chidiac, Joseph Canner, Daniel Sangkyu Rhee
{"title":"Statewide Variation in Practices and Charges for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Maryland, United States: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Grace Lassiter, Eric Etchill, Tamir Sholklapper, Charbel Chidiac, Joseph Canner, Daniel Sangkyu Rhee","doi":"10.5090/jcs.24.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) remains undefined. Furthermore, the overall utilization and costs of various treatment approaches are incompletely understood. We investigated hospital charges and resource utilization by management strategy across the state of Maryland in adult and pediatric patients with PSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database for patients aged 10-40 years admitted with PSP between 2012 and 2020. Patients managed with a chest tube alone (CT) were compared with recipients of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Subsequently, we analyzed hospital charges for patients undergoing early VATS (<48 hours post-admission) vs. delayed VATS (≥48 hours). The predicted incremental cost of early vs. delayed VATS was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 354 admissions were identified, with 211 (59.6%) receiving CT management and 143 (40.4%) undergoing VATS. Patients receiving VATS were more likely to be female (24% vs. 15%, p=0.030) and Black (32% vs. 20%, p=0.035) than CT recipients. The median total hospital charge for CT recipients was $6,493, compared to $20,437 for patients managed surgically (p<0.001). Delayed surgery during the index admission was associated with significantly higher total hospital charges-including operating room, room and board, radiology, and laboratory costs-than early surgery. Applying early VATS to all patients appeared more cost-efficient than delayed VATS (per-patient costs: $18,568 vs. $30,832, p<0.001), although the former had slightly higher recurrence (7.9% vs. 1.5%, p=0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Variations in management strategies, particularly surgical decision-making and timing, impact hospital charges and utilization for patients with PSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"34-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11738139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.24.051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) remains undefined. Furthermore, the overall utilization and costs of various treatment approaches are incompletely understood. We investigated hospital charges and resource utilization by management strategy across the state of Maryland in adult and pediatric patients with PSP.

Methods: We queried the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database for patients aged 10-40 years admitted with PSP between 2012 and 2020. Patients managed with a chest tube alone (CT) were compared with recipients of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Subsequently, we analyzed hospital charges for patients undergoing early VATS (<48 hours post-admission) vs. delayed VATS (≥48 hours). The predicted incremental cost of early vs. delayed VATS was calculated.

Results: Overall, 354 admissions were identified, with 211 (59.6%) receiving CT management and 143 (40.4%) undergoing VATS. Patients receiving VATS were more likely to be female (24% vs. 15%, p=0.030) and Black (32% vs. 20%, p=0.035) than CT recipients. The median total hospital charge for CT recipients was $6,493, compared to $20,437 for patients managed surgically (p<0.001). Delayed surgery during the index admission was associated with significantly higher total hospital charges-including operating room, room and board, radiology, and laboratory costs-than early surgery. Applying early VATS to all patients appeared more cost-efficient than delayed VATS (per-patient costs: $18,568 vs. $30,832, p<0.001), although the former had slightly higher recurrence (7.9% vs. 1.5%, p=0.08).

Conclusion: Variations in management strategies, particularly surgical decision-making and timing, impact hospital charges and utilization for patients with PSP.

美国马里兰州全州范围内原发性自发性气胸的治疗方法和收费差异:回顾性研究。
背景:原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的最佳治疗方法仍未确定。此外,人们对各种治疗方法的总体利用率和成本也不甚了解。我们调查了马里兰州成人和儿童 PSP 患者的住院费用和资源利用情况,并按治疗策略进行了分类:我们查询了马里兰州卫生服务成本审查委员会数据库中 2012 年至 2020 年间 10-40 岁 PSP 住院患者的资料。我们将仅使用胸管(CT)的患者与接受视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的患者进行了比较。随后,我们分析了接受早期 VATS 手术患者的住院费用(结果:总共确定了 354 例入院患者,其中 211 例(59.6%)接受了 CT 治疗,143 例(40.4%)接受了 VATS 治疗。与接受 CT 治疗的患者相比,接受 VATS 治疗的患者更可能是女性(24% 对 15%,P=0.030)和黑人(32% 对 20%,P=0.035)。接受CT治疗的患者住院总费用中位数为6493美元,而接受手术治疗的患者住院总费用中位数为20437美元(P结论:管理策略的不同,尤其是手术决策和时机的不同,会影响 PSP 患者的住院费用和使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信