Real-world clinical outcomes and rationale for initiating abatacept as a first-line biologic for patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody- and rheumatoid factor-positive rheumatoid arthritis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandrina Balanean, Cherrishe Brown-Bickerstaff, Andrew Klink, Vardhaman Patel, Hanke Zheng, Laetitia N'Dri, Keith Wittstock, Bruce Feinberg, Mark Chaballa, Vadim Khaychuk, Jill Kaufman, Prathamesh Pathak, Gordon Lam
{"title":"Real-world clinical outcomes and rationale for initiating abatacept as a first-line biologic for patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody- and rheumatoid factor-positive rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"Alexandrina Balanean, Cherrishe Brown-Bickerstaff, Andrew Klink, Vardhaman Patel, Hanke Zheng, Laetitia N'Dri, Keith Wittstock, Bruce Feinberg, Mark Chaballa, Vadim Khaychuk, Jill Kaufman, Prathamesh Pathak, Gordon Lam","doi":"10.57264/cer-2023-0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), seropositivity for both anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) is associated with disease severity and therapeutic response. Biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as abatacept are recommended after inadequate response or contraindication to conventional synthetic DMARDs. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) measures over 12 months among patients with ACPA+ and RF+ RA with an inadequate response to methotrexate treated with abatacept as a first-line bDMARD. <b>Patients & methods:</b> Patient data were abstracted from medical records by treating rheumatologists. Analyses included McNemar tests for paired proportions or paired <i>t</i>-tests to assess longitudinal changes in CDAI scores, and Kaplan-Meier methods for time-to-event outcomes. Serious AEs and rationale for initiating treatment were recorded. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 296 patients were included. Mean CDAI scores improved (decreased) by 34.0, 61.0 and 74.0% (all p < 0.001) from baseline to 3-6 months, 6-12 months and ≥12 months after abatacept initiation, respectively. Of 279 patients not in CDAI low disease activity (LDA) or remission at baseline, 24.7% of patients achieved it within 6 months, 56.3% within 12 months and 71.0% at any point during follow-up after abatacept initiation. Median time to CDAI LDA/remission was 10.2 months. Serious AEs were reported in 2.4% of patients. Common reasons reported by rheumatologists for initiating abatacept were effectiveness/efficacy (52.7%), safety (31.4%) and patient preference (25.3%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In this analysis of patients with ACPA+ and RF+ RA treated with abatacept as a first-line bDMARD in a clinical practice setting, clinical outcomes and remission rates were improved at all time points, providing real-world evidence to further support the use of abatacept in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e230144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), seropositivity for both anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) is associated with disease severity and therapeutic response. Biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as abatacept are recommended after inadequate response or contraindication to conventional synthetic DMARDs. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) measures over 12 months among patients with ACPA+ and RF+ RA with an inadequate response to methotrexate treated with abatacept as a first-line bDMARD. Patients & methods: Patient data were abstracted from medical records by treating rheumatologists. Analyses included McNemar tests for paired proportions or paired t-tests to assess longitudinal changes in CDAI scores, and Kaplan-Meier methods for time-to-event outcomes. Serious AEs and rationale for initiating treatment were recorded. Results: Overall, 296 patients were included. Mean CDAI scores improved (decreased) by 34.0, 61.0 and 74.0% (all p < 0.001) from baseline to 3-6 months, 6-12 months and ≥12 months after abatacept initiation, respectively. Of 279 patients not in CDAI low disease activity (LDA) or remission at baseline, 24.7% of patients achieved it within 6 months, 56.3% within 12 months and 71.0% at any point during follow-up after abatacept initiation. Median time to CDAI LDA/remission was 10.2 months. Serious AEs were reported in 2.4% of patients. Common reasons reported by rheumatologists for initiating abatacept were effectiveness/efficacy (52.7%), safety (31.4%) and patient preference (25.3%). Conclusion: In this analysis of patients with ACPA+ and RF+ RA treated with abatacept as a first-line bDMARD in a clinical practice setting, clinical outcomes and remission rates were improved at all time points, providing real-world evidence to further support the use of abatacept in this patient population.

阿帕他赛作为抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体和类风湿因子阳性类风湿性关节炎患者的一线生物制剂的实际临床效果和启动理由。
目的:在类风湿性关节炎(RA)中,抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体(ACPA)和类风湿因子(RF)血清阳性与疾病严重程度和治疗反应有关。在对传统合成 DMARDs 反应不佳或有禁忌症时,建议使用阿巴他赛普等生物 (b) 改性抗风湿药物 (DMARDs)。这项回顾性队列研究旨在描述对甲氨蝶呤反应不充分的ACPA+和RF+ RA患者使用阿巴他赛普作为一线bDMARD治疗12个月后临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)的变化情况。患者和方法患者数据由主治风湿病医生从病历中提取。分析方法包括配对比例的McNemar检验或配对t检验,以评估CDAI评分的纵向变化,以及Kaplan-Meier方法,以评估从时间到事件的结果。严重AE和开始治疗的理由均有记录。研究结果共纳入 296 名患者。平均 CDAI 评分分别提高(降低)了 34.0%、61.0% 和 74.0%(均为 p 结论:ACPA 患者的平均 CDAI 评分提高(降低)了 34.0%、61.0% 和 74.0%(均为 p):在这项针对ACPA+和RF+ RA患者的分析中,阿帕他赛普作为一线bDMARD在临床实践中得到了应用,其临床疗效和缓解率在所有时间点均有所改善,为进一步支持阿帕他赛普在这类患者中的应用提供了实际证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信