Utilisation of the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Dennis J van den Berg, Henri Kiers, Esther T Maas, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland, Raymond W J G Ostelo
{"title":"Utilisation of the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Dennis J van den Berg, Henri Kiers, Esther T Maas, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland, Raymond W J G Ostelo","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2024.2421821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the frequency of administration and the usage of the Hip Disability and Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS/KOOS) and their Physical function Short forms (HOOS-PS/KOOS-PS) by physiotherapists after total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study using an open online survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary care physiotherapy practices affiliated with the Dutch Association for Quality in Physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Physiotherapists with experience treating over five patients with a THA or TKA within the past 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-six physiotherapists completed the survey (median age: 40.0 years, female: 34%, median experience: 15.0 years). Of those, 32 did not administer the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) ('non-users'), 41 administered only due to organisational requirements or guideline recommendations ('passive users') and 93 actively used them for individual patient treatment purposes ('active users'). 'Treatment evaluation', 'diagnosis', and 'prognosis' were most often reported as potential reasons to actively use the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) for individual treatment purposes. Determinants associated with active use of the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) appeared to be fewer years of experience as a physiotherapist, a larger treatment volume of THA/TKA, a younger age, and higher attitude scores regarding PROM use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most responding physiotherapists administer the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS), but their use for individual treatment is limited. Active users appear to be less experienced, younger, treat larger volumes of THA/TKA, and possess a more positive attitude towards using patient-reported outcome measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2024.2421821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the frequency of administration and the usage of the Hip Disability and Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS/KOOS) and their Physical function Short forms (HOOS-PS/KOOS-PS) by physiotherapists after total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA).

Design: A cross-sectional study using an open online survey.

Setting: Primary care physiotherapy practices affiliated with the Dutch Association for Quality in Physiotherapy.

Participants: Physiotherapists with experience treating over five patients with a THA or TKA within the past 5 years.

Results: One hundred and sixty-six physiotherapists completed the survey (median age: 40.0 years, female: 34%, median experience: 15.0 years). Of those, 32 did not administer the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) ('non-users'), 41 administered only due to organisational requirements or guideline recommendations ('passive users') and 93 actively used them for individual patient treatment purposes ('active users'). 'Treatment evaluation', 'diagnosis', and 'prognosis' were most often reported as potential reasons to actively use the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) for individual treatment purposes. Determinants associated with active use of the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) appeared to be fewer years of experience as a physiotherapist, a larger treatment volume of THA/TKA, a younger age, and higher attitude scores regarding PROM use.

Conclusions: Most responding physiotherapists administer the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS), but their use for individual treatment is limited. Active users appear to be less experienced, younger, treat larger volumes of THA/TKA, and possess a more positive attitude towards using patient-reported outcome measures.

全髋关节和膝关节置换术后物理治疗中髋关节残疾和膝关节损伤骨关节炎结果评分的使用情况:横断面调查。
目的探讨全髋关节和膝关节置换术(THA/TKA)后物理治疗师使用髋关节残疾和膝关节损伤骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS/KOOS)及其物理功能简表(HOOS-PS/KOOS-PS)的频率和使用情况:设计:采用开放式在线调查的横断面研究:环境:荷兰物理治疗质量协会下属的初级物理治疗诊所:结果:166 名物理治疗师在过去 5 年中治疗过超过 5 名 THA 或 TKA 患者:166 名物理治疗师完成了调查(年龄中位数:40.0 岁,女性:34%,经验中位数:15.0 年)。其中,32 人未使用 HOOS(-PS) 或 KOOS(-PS)("非用户"),41 人仅因组织要求或指南建议而使用("被动用户"),93 人积极将其用于个别患者的治疗目的("积极用户")。据报告,"治疗评估"、"诊断 "和 "预后 "是最常见的将 HOOS(-PS) 或 KOOS(-PS) 用于个人治疗的潜在原因。与积极使用 HOOS(-PS) 或 KOOS(-PS) 相关的决定因素似乎是物理治疗师的工作年限较短、THA/TKA 治疗量较大、年龄较小、对使用 PROM 的态度评分较高:结论:大多数做出回应的物理治疗师都会使用 HOOS(-PS) 或 KOOS(-PS),但它们在个人治疗中的应用有限。活跃用户似乎经验较少、较年轻、治疗的 THA/TKA 病例较多、对使用患者报告结果测量方法持更积极的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信