Leveraging the social networks of informal healthcare providers for universal health coverage: insights from the Indian Sundarbans.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rittika Brahmachari, Manasee Mishra, George Gotsadze, Sabyasachi Mandal
{"title":"Leveraging the social networks of informal healthcare providers for universal health coverage: insights from the Indian Sundarbans.","authors":"Rittika Brahmachari, Manasee Mishra, George Gotsadze, Sabyasachi Mandal","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>India's healthcare landscape is characterized by a multitude of public and private healthcare providers, yet its health systems remain weak in many areas. Informal healthcare providers (IHPs) bridge this gap, particularly in rural India, and are deeply embedded within local communities. While their importance is widely recognized, there is a knowledge gap regarding the specifics of their social networks with actors in health systems. The aim of this study was to map the social networks of IHPs to elucidate the type and nature of their relationships, in order to explore opportunities for intersectoral collaboration to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). We have adopted the social network analysis (SNA) approach using qualitative ego-network methodology to evaluate the types and strengths of ties in the Indian Sundarbans. A total of 34 IHPs participated in the study. Qualitative data were analysed using NVivo10 and Kumu.io was used to visualize the social networks. Results show that the 34 IHPs had a total of 1362 ties with diverse actors, spanning the government, private sector and community. The majority of the ties were strong, with various motivating factors underpinning the relationships. Most of these ties were active and have continued for over a decade. The robust presence of IHPs in the Indian Sundarbans is attributable to the numerous, strong and often mutually beneficial ties. The findings suggest a need to reconsider the engagement of IHPs within formal health systems. Rather than isolation, a nuanced approach is required based on intersectoral collaboration capitalizing on these social ties with other actors to achieve UHC in impoverished and underserved regions globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":"39 Supplement_2","pages":"i105-i120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India's healthcare landscape is characterized by a multitude of public and private healthcare providers, yet its health systems remain weak in many areas. Informal healthcare providers (IHPs) bridge this gap, particularly in rural India, and are deeply embedded within local communities. While their importance is widely recognized, there is a knowledge gap regarding the specifics of their social networks with actors in health systems. The aim of this study was to map the social networks of IHPs to elucidate the type and nature of their relationships, in order to explore opportunities for intersectoral collaboration to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). We have adopted the social network analysis (SNA) approach using qualitative ego-network methodology to evaluate the types and strengths of ties in the Indian Sundarbans. A total of 34 IHPs participated in the study. Qualitative data were analysed using NVivo10 and Kumu.io was used to visualize the social networks. Results show that the 34 IHPs had a total of 1362 ties with diverse actors, spanning the government, private sector and community. The majority of the ties were strong, with various motivating factors underpinning the relationships. Most of these ties were active and have continued for over a decade. The robust presence of IHPs in the Indian Sundarbans is attributable to the numerous, strong and often mutually beneficial ties. The findings suggest a need to reconsider the engagement of IHPs within formal health systems. Rather than isolation, a nuanced approach is required based on intersectoral collaboration capitalizing on these social ties with other actors to achieve UHC in impoverished and underserved regions globally.

利用非正规医疗服务提供者的社会网络促进全民医保:印度孙德尔本斯的启示。
印度医疗保健领域的特点是公立和私立医疗保健机构众多,但许多地区的医疗保健系统仍然薄弱。非正规医疗服务提供者(IHPs)弥补了这一差距,尤其是在印度农村地区,他们深深扎根于当地社区。虽然他们的重要性已得到广泛认可,但关于他们与医疗系统参与者之间的社会网络的具体情况却存在知识空白。本研究旨在绘制国际水文计划人员的社会网络图,以阐明其关系的类型和性质,从而探索跨部门合作的机会,实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)。我们采用了社会网络分析(SNA)方法,使用定性自我网络方法来评估印度孙德尔本斯的联系类型和强度。共有 34 名国际水文计划人员参与了研究。使用 NVivo10 对定性数据进行了分析,并使用 Kumu.io 对社会网络进行了可视化。结果显示,34 名国际水文计划人员与政府、私营部门和社区的不同参与者共有 1362 条联系。大多数关系都很牢固,有各种动机因素支撑着这些关系。这些关系中的大多数都很活跃,并且已经持续了十多年。国际水文计划在印度孙德尔本斯的强势存在归功于众多的、强有力的、往往是互利的联系。研究结果表明,有必要重新考虑国际水文计划在正规卫生系统中的参与问题。需要采取一种基于部门间合作的细致入微的方法,利用这些与其他行动者的社会联系,而不是孤立地在全球贫困和服务不足的地区实现全民保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信